Post
The🧵 👇also fact-checks the claim, Jackdaw gas were 4x less climate-damaging than imported LNG. The main point I see in the 🧵: comparing imported LNG to Jackdaw's CO2e intentionally omits today's biggest import source: Norway's pipeline gas, which comes with -ooops– the lowest CO2e of all 3 options.
As I'm typing this I'm listening to misinformation on national radio about how good this decision will be for jobs and tax revenues. The truth is that many times more jobs would be created if the same investment was put into renewables. www.theguardian.com/environment/...
If we're talking about marketing, mainstream economics and/or the engineering that supports their activities, then that would be pretty much every single UK university. And once you've finished your degree, they turn up in person to recruit you to work for them: peopleandplanet.org/fossil-free-...
1 repost1 like
No replies yet.