Post

If you have lived life in republic where people voting to touch the stove has never had profound, understood negative material impact because it was managed away – something was already broken and someway possibly inevitable. Break the feedback loop of a market or idea, you eventually break it all.

This is such an important facet of a much larger idea but it is so misunderstood on its own I might just delete this. Resentment of a "deep state" is downstream of legislature that rules by omnibus bill with no votes for ideas or policy. Leaving a state trying to continue in absence of a pillar.

As I have said long time, the court really did take over the job of social issue response with pressure relief votes as legislature deferred. Executive agencies really did take over the job of creating legislation as the legislature became evermore calcified. Everything is the legislature breaking.

I don't know if people are in an information vacuum or are they strategically don't acknowledge it, but there is like a lot of very iffy executive actions and constructed court precedents that built your world and you like me probably like. But that was something the legislature was supposed to do.

The EPA did take regulatory action of profundity they "should not" have. The department of education did issue incomplete regulatory edicts they "didn't" have power to. There were arbitrary and capricious executive actions. Based on issues the legislature should've addressed in some amelioration.

This is probably a level of maturity of challenging how we got here today that is unwise. Because we did get here somehow. And it's not because of their story. But it's not the cleanest story that makes you feel the best, either. It's full of intractable hells and adaptation.

Goes back to the Roe decision, to a degree, the courts decided, but the legislature decided to sit on that fact and string people along (effectively) to keep it an issue for voters, but then do nothing about it