Post

It’s unpacking the court! Unpacking all the manipulation and maneuvering to create the current composition while also addressing the workload.

Expanding the court is the only position….expanding the Congress also.

She got more votes, incel

Add to that, binding ethics rules and penalties for violating them!

Exactly! Thank you for helping validate this move in the right direction!

I concur!

I think it's from her new podcast with Kara Swisher. Every Wednesday.

And in 13 seconds

youtube.com/shorts/r2iUI... youtube.com/shorts/CFaUd... 🇺🇸GeneralCalls911 TdumpPutinNuclear ButtonPush🇺🇸BlueCities Don'tBe2Cockey! HillaryVotes Stolen1,000Lazers BragedStole3Elections IndiaHasFallenSatelliteProf Hillary✅️ TdumpMuskRussiaAsset NaziTraitor NeedPaperProof Ur🗳Challenged 🗳Count Vote.org

That's fine and all, but it doesn't matter if there are no consequences for the crooks like Alito, Thomas, and Kavanaugh as well as the Chief Justice that enabled the corruption of this court

Why is no one talking about PROSECTING the court for corruption??? Harlan Crow literally owns Clanace Thomas' mother's house FFS! That is corruption and prosecuting that is the LAW!

Every federal district should have its own Supreme Court Justice for proper representation.

This was original intent 240 years ago. The root issue with 99.9% of all of our political problems is the obscene tap dance that was done around slavery when all of this was originally written. If not for that, the way the Senate is structured, states, electoral college, etc.... wouldn't exist.

I’d go higher so that it doesn’t matter anymore. 19 justices. They can still do the job but no president would ever get to appoint enough to make a difference.

yknow what? I'm with her.

Expand away but 6 need to be impeached, indicted & convicted of sedition, bribery, collusion with enemies of our nation, & undermining our Constitutional law.

Expanding the court won't work because the shadow docket still allows for justices to hear emergency cases and rule without actually hearing evidence. Since Congress can set jurisdiction of the SC, they need to make all cases regarding Executive power require a full court.

dream vision burn the senate to the ground

If we don’t expand the court, these people will never be held accountable.

Expanding *to 13* is the moderate position. I would support 47, in honor of Trump, who made this necessary. 45, if you must.

Okay so now this is actually the moderate position

Impeach the current corrupt members and replace them with members that are not corrupt.

Practically regressive at this point, Moderate would be Expansion, Term Limits, and a provision that the general public can vote a justice into a bear cage for a death match any time they're cross with them.

Minimum two per Circuit to start, then rush them through all in a single D admin so the R's have something to bitch about for another 100 years or until the trials complete

🎯 Thirteen justices.

The whole US political and justice system needs to be scrapped and started again or you will get another trump like president.

13 judges is court packing. 30 judges is court reform. roll in double the size of the lower courts and we are talking. but of course hillary, ever the incrementalist, wants to take baby steps when the house is on fire.

no. 2 judges for every district. if we are just trying make some nice clean formula (which i find silly), why not 2x the number of districts? why not 1 for every 10 million ppl? so 33-34 judges? the more the better. make it impossible to control, and each appointment insignificant.

The nominations and the confirmation have become so partisan you are just getting very partisan judges. Kavanaugh, Alito, Roberts, Barrett and Thomas all worked in either the Bush or Reagan administrations or campaigns. That's right, 5 of the 6 Republican appointees had a political background.

💯

I hold the extreme position where we classify the 6 conservatives as enemy combatants and waterboard them until they admit they are communists attacking America.

The political branches controlling the size and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is OG originalism.

I really really wish people would listen to Hillary. She has ALWAYS been right.

Yes! Expand the Supreme Court to 13! It would solve so many problems with the current court’s back log and reliance on the shadow docket. Then, institute an ethics code and impeach the Justices who perjured to get appointed or self-dealt. And expand the House of Reps.

Republicans already packed the court

bsky.app/profile/supr...

Absolutely right! 2029 is the target year.

The problem is that President Fuckface will still be in power for 2 more years.

Hillary is right, as usual The idiots here saying she's basically republican are being obtuse Either on purpose, or because they are idiots

Speaking my language. I say 19

Start with 200 and compromise with 29

Nah. Force Alito, Thomas, Roberts, Kavanaugh to all share one tiny basement office. The building was rundown and we had to close your offices for remodeling. It will be done sometime around a quarter to never.

Step out of the spotlight already. I don’t give a shit what she thinks about anything. Her and her husband have caused enough bullshit for people especially the working class. Just go away!

So say I as well

🔥

But not while a Republican can pick their successors.

YES!!

Impeach the corrupt members of the court and remove them. Then hold up and replacements till after the next election.

@elienyc.bsky.social explains why USA needs 29 justices on US Supreme Court / #SCOTUS. There are precedents in USA & around 🌍for expanding this court. cc @democrats.org @pressley.house.gov @warren.senate.gov @vanhollen.senate.gov @kamalaharris.com @joyannreid.bsky.social @zeteo.com @theguardian.com

She knows half the seats on that court were unconstitutional.

This one justice for each circuit bit is silly. There used to be circuit riding. We have had a court of appeals since around 1891. Not having a justice for the federal circuit isn't much of a burden. If it sells okay, but I'm not buying it.

Now do my other policy change. TERM LIMITS on SCOTUS... 18 years sounds totally reasonable (3 terms for a Senator, which is another idea I have, same for Congressman 18 years tops).

The actually moderate position. Current use seems to be that DINO buttkissing is the moderate position.

Yup. And with 3 per circuit you can stagger that & have the 3 review cases in their circuit for cert to the full SCOTUS, reducing the workload and making it less arbitrary who gets SCOTUS to rule on cases. It's silly that we have the same # of justices we had with less than 1/3 of the population.

I know true neutrality is impossible, but Justice's used to care. They used try to be impartial. This is happening because the Roberts Court lost the plot and decided they're going to pervert their role to invalidate large swaths of the constitution.

It went so bad last time when we ignored this intelligent woman. I decided to do so!

what's yours? short of a constitutional amendment this is the simplest solution not limited by the constitution.

Yup, the more radical idea is to embrace originalism as the troll that it always was and refuse to honor the Marbury precedent. Then, using that justification, throw out any SC case decided under originalism. I only bring it up to show that yeah, leaving things as-is and adding justices is moderate.

Go away Hillary! I didn't care about your "emails" but your time is over! Never again do we nominate a nepo person! No more Bushes, no more Clintons and for sure no more trumps!!

Politicians lie, but sometimes they tell the truth about themselves in ways they didn't mean to

John Roberts has overseen an unconscionable level of partisanship at the Court. Hmm, would more judicial elections be helpful? The mind, it boggles.

It’s crazy how litigious the U.S. is. The more police, the more crime, the more crime, the more courts.