Post

It's good to have peer reviewed studies to point to rather than just vibes when fighting those bans, or discussing the subject with people who are underinformed.

Important stuff, but none of the 3 books in the photo for the article are by women of color. And including a Colleen Hoover book as an example is extremely weird. She’s a white woman who writes dark-themed adult romance.

I keep seeing comments bringing up the scene in Gender Queer that says teens shouldn’t be pressured into having sex as an example of porn. I know rule 34 exists but I never thought abstinence porn was a thing.

God forbid a white child read a book by a black woman and maybe, IDK, enjoy it? Identify with the protagonist? Learn something new? Not to minimize this destructive racist BS but: Heaven forfend (clutches pearls)

So rather than being racist you’re a transphobe? Not exactly winning any points there. Gender Queer isn’t a book for kids. Even the author has stated that it isn’t intended for kids.

Well, duh. The bans are always enacted by ignorant, racist, misogynist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic, intolerant, gap-toothed, mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging, troglodyte pseudo-Christian rednecks who would ban Christ himself if he actually showed up today. What else are they going to ban?

None of the books pictured are being “taught” to children. Plenty of examples of book bans hitting school libraries and the librarians just scratching their heads because none of the books are present in the library.

Exactly. Just more Right Wing scare tactics. Ironically, they warn of children being "indoctrinated" during the week by being exposed to reality, then send those same children off on Sunday to be indoctrinated with myths for which no concrete evidence exists. Projection Lives!

I think you’re missing the point entirely I’m not judging the books, topics or even content I’m simply saying that parents should have the right to determine what books are available in school libraries

It’s sad how conservatives often link the inclusion of women of colour to ‘liberal propaganda’ while it’s, in fact, just a representation of reality.

No shocker there. The fully loaded white supremacy terrorist org (moms for liberty) are Trad wives gone madd! They are such miserable 1950 house slaves they’ll make any excuse to get away from their cruel husbands. Remember Phyllis Schlafly? She’s come back to haunt us!

🤣 Some parent(s)/care-giver(s)/conservators prefer to have certain books in age appropriate sections. If it's really all about "gender queer" & not j.o. porn, have you read anything by William S. Burroughs, Oscar Wilde, Jack Kérouac, Virginia Wolfe, Ursula K. Le Guin, Ginsberg, or Alice B. Toklas?

"I swear it's just about age appropriateness you guys! It's just that Heather has two mommies, a book with a message so uncontroversial as 'other families look different and that's okay' is just too salacious and inappropriate for elementary school!"

My favorite example of a book being banned with no explicit content period was "Heather has two mommies" on the grounds that it was pornographic in nature by showing these two women in a relationship. It's never about "age appropriate". They're just liars.

In all honesty, if a book entitled “Gender Queer” is “peer-reviewed?” It literally begs the question. Answer? Anyone? Bueller? Sometimes our blatant self parodies are way too ridiculous. We use the term “normalize” without ever actually applying it. I said what I said. Sue me - Time to get real.

Surprised to know that the USA also bans books for colour, race, blasphemy etc. Denying children the right to learn varied kinds of writings is like denying various kinds of vitamins. I thought such bans happened only in Asian Hindu or Islamic countries.

Well, bear in mind that what we call a "ban" doesn't mean you can't get a book. You can buy them all, including used copies at greatly reduced prices. And in some states what's not in the school library may still be in the public library and borrowable even with a children's card.

You should not be surprised. Read the Broken Earth trilogy and was delighted that 80% of the characters obviously had skin hues much darker than mine, and dreds. Only 15% of the entire world is white and I am sick to death of the black person getting killed off first. We must have equity.

I haven't using Libby and Overdrive since the pandemic. I wondered if that was being supportive enough of libraries. Now, I'm seeing captions under books I have on hold saying, "your library has ordered 12 more copies"...so I guess that's supporting the authors that I like!

Dawg diversity includes everyone, including white straight men, it's everyone's opinion in literature - even that of the dominant group - that makes reading so interesting, it's everyone's opinion and thoughts and the contrary. Removing a group shortens the sights of everyone.