Post

And hopefully the last.

Does not belong in a court room where finding the truth is supposed to be paramount. These aren't this man's words. They are words written by others (his family today but tomorrow the lawyer or who else). Who gets to decide what a dead man speaks if there is disagreement on what he might say?

It is not a "video recording" it is an "AI faked video". This is insane and gross emotional manipulation, and shouldn't be allowed on court.

Oh hell naw. Another weird line to put in the will: "If I'm murdered or die by manslaughter, don't you do no stupid AI impact statement for me."

Just wait until a defendant puts forth a video of a murder victim declaring his innocence.

“Disrespectful” is a weird word to choose. It’s prejudicial. Who cares if it’s disrespectful?

🤮

This is horrible. Nobody should have the right to put words in a dead man's mouth that he didn't say or approve of.

Every single person responsible for this should be shot out of a cannon into a giant fan

What the fuck

Note to all of my family and friends: NEVER do this on my behalf.

This is disgusting.

cut to his weird ass sister giving PR trained and rehearsed responses around both "wanting his voice to be heard" but also her admitting she wrote the entire script herself

Whoever suggested this should be held in contempt of court for this display of bullshit.

This is so breathtakingly stupid

This is fucked up, quit it with this creep AI shit

This is not a recording of him! This is playing dolls with his image! This is making him say what somebody else wants him to say! Putting words in his mouth in the most ghoulish way possible! Everybody involved in this should be deeply ashamed!

Ghoulish nonsense.

I hate this. May Chris Pelkey RIP.🙏

Disturbing

Essentially the tech version of a sock puppet. This judge should be retired.

I don’t think this was submitted as evidence, rather this was played during sentencing. Similar to when the family of a victim might speak. At this point in the trial the facts of the matter have already been established and the defendant is already considered guilty. It still *weird* AF though.

This is fucking GHOULISH

lmao this deepfake ai is worse than those conan obrien skits

This is crazy shit

I honestly want to just beat the living fuck out of whoever thought that up, whoever approved it, whoever MADE it. And I do mean BEAT. Like with a ballpeen.

it is legal since it was just for an impact statement... but it's still creepy and wrong.

Cute. We don't do "legal" anymore. #vibesonly

We’re so fucked as a society and I’m not even joking.

F this

on what precedent did the judge allow this? was it thrown out?

It’s not a “video recording of Pelkey”. It’s a fictional creation of a computer, and is in no way a recording of an actual human being.

What the actual fuck! This feels wrong. If a family member wants to speak for the victim, I get that, but it doesn't seem like AI should be allowed to speak for anyone in a courtroom. If AI being used from either side affects the outcome of the case, wouldn't that present a troubling precedent?

Nope.

Wait till it’s used for vengeance and death sentences. It will be if allowed. Making the accused physically look more menacing etc etc My dying wish was that my killer should suffer the immense pain they caused me..

I hate this so much

Oh no no no.

Has anyone auto-tuned it yet

This is so disgusting and lacks any consent from the victim.

Twisted

What on earth

AI-generated victim testimony is precisely what this is

That’s just fucking dumb

I think it’s appalling any judge would allow this and it makes me even angrier that if I said that publicly I’d be accused of siding against victims.

I will have Princess Leah do my sentencing statement.

Looks like he’s not dead then, so it can’t be murder and the guy should walk

Yikes.

Im haunting everyone involved if they do this sh-t to me. 👻

"oh! AI is so realistic" sir his beard isn't moving with his head.