3underscores.bsky.social

3underscores.bsky.social

@3underscores.bsky.social

Mostly tweeting about cities, climate change, demographics, land use, and housing econ on this account. I post photos and facts about Jersey City, where I live. 🇨🇴🇺🇲

1.4K followers614 following3.2K posts

When I and others met with Mayor Solomon when he was a candidate 16 months ago, we walked away with similar conclusions. It is both vindicating and extremely troubling that over 2/3 of his own senior staff have come to the same conclusions and resigned. I worry for the future of Jersey City.

The FAR density of 100 Gold St will be 30, which comparable to some of Namdar's Journal Sq towers (the one at Newark and Central will have a residential FAR of 38.6). By far the highest residential FAR of any Manhattan apartment building (NYC a FAR cap of 12 from 1961-2024)

View full thread

NYC also owns the land, so they are subsidizing via a depressed land sale price. Finally, size: In sheer size, 100 Gold St will be much larger than any single contiguous Namdar block—the Van Reipen/Pavonia block of Homestead Pl will be 2680 apartments.

The FAR density of 100 Gold St will be 30, which comparable to some of Namdar's Journal Sq towers (the one at Newark and Central will have a residential FAR of 38.6). By far the highest residential FAR of any Manhattan apartment building (NYC a FAR cap of 12 from 1961-2024)

Namdar's towers top out at 47-51 floors despite the higher FAR, while 100 Gold will top out at 115 floors, because Journal Sq towers are governed by a height limit, while NYC towers are governed by the FAR limit.

Another interesting point of comparison is the below market rate component. The set aside is 25%, but the rents they can charge for the BMR units are higher (60% AMI vs 53% AMI) and the BMR units are allowed to be mostly 1BRs rather than 3BRs like in JC (700sqft avg size).

3underscores.bsky.social reposted

I didn’t attend climate week but: 1—US is falling way behind on electrification 2—even if US electrified, electricity generation isn’t decarbonizing fast enough 3—public incentives & land use policy are still vastly weighted toward inefficient cars & trucks 4—transit ridership remains in crisis

3underscores.bsky.social reposted

Big meeting Wednesday evening on bus rapid transit on JFK Blvd!! Come out and support!

3underscores.bsky.social reposted

Symbols matter. White House isn't a palace. Kennedy Center is for the general public to enjoy. We don't have a triumphal arch in DC because that's imperial. We don't put the president's face on money because it's monarchical. It's about tearing down everything that says we're a democratic republic.

Scott 𐚁 🦇 Cave 🦇@hellabarnes.bsky.social

I know there’s a savvy take that being attached to the east wing or the kennedy center is a sort of west wing lame-o attachment to the symbols of power and on the other hand he fucking bulldozed our collective property

3underscores.bsky.social reposted

A judge voided Jersey City's demolition ban on Aug. 26. Since 2018, the city could deny demolition of any building, landmarked or not, with no public list of what was protected. The court held state law only lets historic commissions review designated sites. betterblocksnj.org/2026/09/17/c...

betterblocksnj.orgNJ Court Strikes Down Jersey City's Demolition Ban OrdinanceJersey City's demolition ban overturned by court, clarifying rules on historic buildings and demolition.

Fire hit two 3-story rear (accessory) tenements in Jersey City' Paulus Hook neighborhood today. In the 19th century these were built in the backs of lots, with larger tenement buildings in front. This block has 3 altogether, with these 2 attached and the other a few lots away. Photo from reddit.

3underscores.bsky.social reposted

inclusionary zoning is such a deceptive name because it sounds like the opposite of exclusionary zoning when in reality it often just ends up being a whitewashed form of exclusionary zoning I wrote about it here for anyone who wants to learn more:

bettercities.substack.comEverything You Need to Know About Inclusionary ZoningAn analysis of the pros and cons of an often-misunderstood housing policy
3underscores.bsky.social@3underscores.bsky.social

New academic study: Inclusionary zoning costs renters $800k per affordable unit created. This is more than the per-unit cost for the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. While LIHTC which is largely funded by the rich via income taxes, IZOs are regressive because they place the burden on renters.

In other words, low-income people in California tend to live in market-rate housing in places that do *not* have inclusionary zoning at all. At a national level too, low-income people are fleeing states with strict IZ for market rate housing in states that ban IZ altogether.

3underscores.bsky.social@3underscores.bsky.social

Another interesting finding from this paper: "inclusionary" zoning and exclusionary zoning go hand in hand. Towns with stricter inclusionary zoning are whiter, wealthier, and NIMBYer.

Montgomery County MD has a celebrated universal IZO, one of the first in the country. After 52 yrs, 2.2% of its housing stock is aff hsng, despite a 13-15% set aside. Clearly it hasn't significantly advanced purposes of integration, but puzzlingly, I still hear IZ advocates hold it up as a model.

In other words, low-income people in California tend to live in market-rate housing in places that do *not* have inclusionary zoning at all. At a national level too, low-income people are fleeing states with strict IZ for market rate housing in states that ban IZ altogether.

3underscores.bsky.social@3underscores.bsky.social

Another interesting finding from this paper: "inclusionary" zoning and exclusionary zoning go hand in hand. Towns with stricter inclusionary zoning are whiter, wealthier, and NIMBYer.

Montgomery County MD has a celebrated universal IZO, one of the first in the country. After 52 yrs, 2.2% of its housing stock is aff hsng, despite a 13-15% set aside. Clearly it hasn't significantly advanced purposes of integration, but puzzlingly, I still hear IZ advocates hold it up as a model.

New academic study: Inclusionary zoning costs renters $800k per affordable unit created. This is more than the per-unit cost for the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. While LIHTC which is largely funded by the rich via income taxes, IZOs are regressive because they place the burden on renters.

View full thread

IZOs are regressive to the extent they raise rents for all market-rate tenants regardless of income to fund brand new apartments for a small number of lottery winners. The evidence has rapidly gotten stronger over the past 5 years as more researchers have scrutinized these programs.

New academic study: Inclusionary zoning costs renters $800k per affordable unit created. This is more than the per-unit cost for the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. While LIHTC which is largely funded by the rich via income taxes, IZOs are regressive because they place the burden on renters.

3underscores.bsky.social reposted

PATH Weekend Ridership Smashes Modern-Era Records After Service Improvements Ridership surges 26% in June, after JC & Hoboken stations get 7-10 minute headways all day on weekends and direct Journal Sq-33 St service is reintroduced. betterblocksnj.org/2026/07/21/p...

betterblocksnj.orgPATH Weekend Service Improvements Drive 26% Ridership Surge YoYDiscover how recent PATH service improvements boosted weekend ridership by 26% in June, highlighting the impact of transit-oriented development.

3underscores.bsky.social reposted

Fun find this afternoon: In 1957, the Port Authority did the engineering work to link the downtown PATH to the Lexington Avenue subway local tracks.

Some local flavor: downtown JC has a 15% IZ set-aside for upzoned land. In five years, not a single affordable unit has broken ground in downtown JC. When thr IZO passed, then-councilman Solomon pledged to relax the IZO if it didnt work. Instead he ran on making it more onerous & applying citywide

So...tonight JC's new infrasturture director asked neighborhood meeting attendees for a show of hands if we should have paid parking permit zones. Is this how we're going to do street safety improvements now, under the new admin? Straw polls at NIMBY meetings with an average age of 65?

He pretty much promiaed nothing would be done in the near future. The previous infrastructure director, who transformed Newark Ave and Bergen Square from parking to public space and built protected bike lanes all over town, resigned as soon as the new mayor took over. 😕

Bought a coat rack in Bayonne and biked home with it over my handlebars a couple days ago. It was an odd revelation having cars give me almost the legally required 4 feet of passing clearance. Feels so different, and virtually never happens when youre not carrying a 6-foot pole.

The new Target in Journal Sq is a disappointment. The store is too small with not enough variery ir quantity of items in stock, especially value sizes. Fine, but the store 's retail space could easily be 3x larger—above it there are two levels of dedicated "free" parking that sit mostly empty...

Anyone who knows the area knows that nobody with a car and a brain will drive into the Journal Sq traffic cauldron to go to Target when they can drive to the two strip mall Targets at the edges of JC that are located off highways. The parking loses them more customers than it gains them.

This is a neighborhood with about 10,000 residents without cars within a 5 minute walking distance, and another 10,000 at least to come. Nonsensical store planning. It's a glorified convenience store thanks to all the parking.

In his order denying the city's temporary injunction against closing Christ Hospital on Saturday, Judge Anthony d'Elia basically says Mayor Solomon has been gaslighting constituents with the argument that Christ Hospital illegally closed.

Also notes that JC's politicians have done *nothing* to solve the central problem with Christ Hospital: lack of funding. I would go farther and note they've moved us *further* from a solution on funding, by removing redevelopment as a funding avenue..

3underscores.bsky.social reposted

The only ethical slopulism is unethical slopulism, where you don’t believe any of the crowd pleasing shit and will do sane policy in office while handwaving away how it’s actually no tax on tips or whatever. Unfortunately both politicians and voters almost always become what they pretend to be.

If you sign up for updates from Ward F councilman Gilmore, he sends you advertisements for his for-profit business "Educational Gilmore Speaks LLC." The proceeds benefit the "EGS Scholarship Fund," which just means he gives kids discounts for his "services" and pockets the money. Grifter.