CA cities that disapprove housing projects are in a world of hurt. New Court of Appeal decision sets up developer lawsuits for damages, at least where state law requires a ministerial permit (SB 35/423, AB 2011, SB 684, and more).
Shi v. Palos Verdes.
threadreaderapp.com/thread/21141...
Socialism is hoping some workers lose their jobs as a means for cheaper housing for the cool kids.
Also, screw allowing more housing, that's a developer giveaway.
Please read even one news article about this before commenting.
"Environmental review" is routinely abused by nimbys to block environmentally friendly infill housing.
The environmental review is mostly pretextual.
We need a state bill that prohibits transfer taxes from being discriminatory against multifamily.
Progressive transfer taxes must not scale solely by parcel value, but parcel value divided by number of homes.
www.albanyscanner.com/2026/10/16/e...
Every time I learn about a Mills Act tax exemption in Berkeley I become incandescent with civic rage. $37k per year subsidy to this 7,700-square-foot mansion that occupies 4 parcels.
Berkeley NIMBYs are convinced a reason their city has a structural deficit is some entities consume more in public services than they pay back into the city.
Not them of course, only the UC is guilty of that sin.
We in California could've had this starting in 2018, but a coalition of leftist glue sniffers and homeowner segregationists chose the terrible outcomes we all face today.
Austin grew its housing stock by 10.5% from 2021 to 2025, versus 3.2% nationally.
Rents fell from above $1,600 to about $1,300, with the biggest drops in older, cheaper buildings.
This person who was quoted as saying that more housing wouldn't help California's housing crisis, was working for the state of California on housing when the crisis began ... up through 2008 through 5 governors ... as the crisis just got worse and worse.
In case you were curious about why you're poor, this is emblematic of the big brains in charge of California housing policy. This is how stupid people think about affordability.
Updated this chart for 2026: property taxes paid by year parcel developed in Berkeley, California. Buildings from this decade pay more taxes than everything Berkeley built in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s combined.
Note: Tax data is current but building data ends in 2025.
This article quotes a sociology professor, a lawyer, and an architect who reject the notion that housing prices are set by supply and demand and do not believe that building more homes reduces rents. It is the housing policy equivalent of platforming climate change deniers.
In case you were curious about why you're poor, this is emblematic of the big brains in charge of California housing policy. This is how stupid people think about affordability.
This article quotes a sociology professor, a lawyer, and an architect who reject the notion that housing prices are set by supply and demand and do not believe that building more homes reduces rents. It is the housing policy equivalent of platforming climate change deniers.
Here is the most-taxed house in Berkeley, the second mansion of infamous non-profit executives Edward and Marsha Dawson, who together take home over $250k per month in don't-call-this-profit. Luckily for the city they haven't tried to shelter this from property taxes (yet).
Max Dubler gets called a marxist for saying property rights are good. Then, in the same thread, he gets called a developer shill by someone else
truly amazing
Conservative government of Alberta is preempting Edmonton, requiring the city to:
βReverse the city's 2024 change allowing small-scale apartment buildings to be built citywide. Change resulted in a building boom: www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...
βRestore parking requirements, which city eliminated in 2020
Listen to the kqed forum, and honestly very torn so far on prop. 45.
One on hand, don't love expediting sprawl and highways.
On the other hand, any chance to tell the legislature to keep CEQA away from housing.
podcastaddict.com/kqed-s-forum...
SB 1090 pauses SB 1123 small-home projects in Altadena until early 2030.
CA YIMBY's Matthew Lewis says owners who can't afford to rebuild and need SB 1123 must now carry their empty lot for three more years, which may push them to sell.
insideclimatenews.org/news/0410202...
Amen. High taxes on the ultra-wealthy is critical. Not to pay for stuff (though in CA it will be a benefit), but because permanent dynastic wealth distorts and eventually destroys economies and democracies
In a housing shortage, you can have first come first served rentals, or auctions.
Many think a landlord is evil if they go the auction route, few acknowledge the FCFS route hurts tenants that can't devote hours of time every day to searching listings and applying before even seeing the home.
Apparently the county just paused the bike lanes for the Treat bridge over 680.
Currently, the safe path is the nasty under highway canal trail, a multi block detour.
Cowards.
I know you'll be shocked, but the guy running to unseat Tregub* doesn't want to engage in nextdoor on whether or not there's a shortage of market rate housing.
*Who is relatively pro-housing
Do you acknowledge there is a shortage of market rate housing and that reforms to enable more are needed
Is a shockingly effective discriminator in Berkeley politics.
I know you'll be shocked, but the guy running to unseat Tregub* doesn't want to engage in nextdoor on whether or not there's a shortage of market rate housing.
*Who is relatively pro-housing
And of course this brings out the cranks who are willing to just say they're against market rate housing.
That's a Majdi supporter for sure.
Vote Tregub.
HAA letter to @sfgov.sf.gov re proposed 848-unit housing development project at 15 Marina Blvd, which includes 86 units for very low-income households.
drive.google.com/file/d/1n10Q...
So with the singing of the plug in solar law, curious if it would facilitate a battery based system.
Like, could I put 1200 watts of panels on the roof, use it to charge a battery, and then feed the 1200 watts in during evening peak.
"[Mayor Nash] acknowledged that the costs of litigation may threaten city services."
Good luck fighting a losing battle against the State which few if any cities have won. Even more hopeless if property changes hands to a domestic oligarch.
www.almanacnews.com/housing/2026...