We Don’t Serve AI Here

Please note: when asked to do something other than being an insulting nit wit (which he's been since before I chimed in), the person doubles down on ad hominems as a pathetic distraction.

If AI is inevitable, then why is Anthropic a failure? If you're a progressive why do you insult people over the superiority of Nazi CSAM misinformation generating theft bots? BLM unless they're down wind of cancer causing fumes from data centers, amirite?

Hey look! Some dip with 200x more followers than me was so mad I respond to him he searched my history for some kind of burn. Listen, chuckles, if you think AI is doing a better job than it was when that article was written then I have an 80 billion dollar loss at Anthropic for you to explain.

I also love that he’s sending me more likes and comments of agreement to all my old posts and so far none of the hate pile on he was hoping for. Womp womp!

A lot of the usual problems with this slop. Why is a child drinking coffee? Why is snoopy in the middle of the road and why is he as big as the cars? But what makes this slop extra funny is some of the prompt text showing up in one of the signs. Crazy arrows indeed.

I read John Gruber for about 2 months back in 2007. I had just moved to Mac and was looking tips. It took me that long to realize what horrendous, pro-corporate takes he had. Zero surprise he’s enjoying the Nazi CSAM site.

Hey @codfather.bsky.social Carl Sagan did not say this. There were no billionaires when he was alive and certainly none trying to go to space. The pic looks AI generated and the quote may be as well.

I asked a young manager at CVS where something was and then could he come and unlock the case for me. He said "no, ring the bell". So I did. And he showed up. LOL, right? I said to him, "in my day they told us waiting in line for goods like toilet paper was communism."

I kind of hate how much attention Holmes gets because in the grand scheme of things she’s not that big a criminal. There are much worse male CEOs out there committing worse crimes they will never answer for. If Holmes had just screwed over her wealthy investors I’d actually consider her a hero.

This is a bad way to talk about slop. Yes, process is important and fun and AI robs you of it. But also AI CANNOT output something that looks just like your art. It is inferior. It lacks charm and eye contact and style. We need to talk about how slop sucks at its job and can’t actually replace us.

Right wingers and genocide supporters cannot for the life of them attract anyone with even enough talent to draw stick figures and formulate an argument. That's why they embrace AI so feverishly.

i don’t know what the answer is here. This diplomatic tact had no effect on the Ultimate folks or the crowd. They simply dug in and made easy excuses for their AI use.

My one disagreement with this is that Kamala Harris would have saved us. Gavin Newsom just signed a bunch of industry approved bills into law. I don’t think a CA politician will ever act against Silicon Valley. We need look elsewhere.

Pointless AI generated continuation of the original first, standalone panel. For one, the second and third panels are redundant and don’t flow. One guy takes the cookies and then the second guy takes the cookies. Then there’s the white guy’s right hand on his left arm in panel 3.

There’s really nothing worse than taking a socialist comic and then running it through a corporate slop machine that scapes it for training to later use to make more slop without paying the artist.

I will normally defend Stancil as a good guy that gets a lot of unnecessary shit. But what the kick he’s on of debating whether “clanker” is a slur or not is tone policing on an epic scale. I don’t care if it is a slur or not. It’s a pejorative for something objectively harmful and terrible.

Being a racist should automatically exclude you from any kind of power, whether it’s corporate or academic. Your biases have control over people’s fates. I would sooner sign a petition removing Kustov from Notre Dame.