Benjamin DeAngelo

Benjamin DeAngelo

@bendeangelo.bsky.social

Principal and Founder, Operation Future, LLC. Adjunct Professor, Howard University. Former Director, EPA Office of Climate Adaptation & Sustainability. Dad, drummer, cyclist.

8K followers300 following96 posts

My Substack post on EPA's recent proposal to rescind all CO2 emission standards from power plants because it claims that it -suddenly - has no authority to do so under the Clean Air Act. EPA's comment period is open until Nov. 2. substack.com/home/post/p-...

substack.comEPA argues its job is to do absolutely nothing about carbon emissionsThe agency charged with protecting public health and the environment is manufacturing new arguments claiming its job is to do nothing about climate pollutants under the Clean Air Act.

Surreal experience as someone who worked on EPA's original GHG endangerment finding. My main message today: EPA is taking the extreme position that the only way it can be consistent with congressional intent and Supreme Court decisions is to do *nothing* to curtail emissions of GHGs

Benjamin DeAngelo reposted

I have a new piece out in Nature today on the record-breaking 2026/2027 El Niño, what impacts we should expect, and how governments can prepare. The Niño3.4 region is currently running more than 1C hotter than any prior event on record, and we remain months away from the peak www.nature.com/artic...

Hi colleagues. Headed to NYC Climate Week next Wed the 23rd and unfortunately only that day due to teaching schedule. Will be attending open and closed sessions focused on climate adaptation & resilience. Looking fwdd to hearing/discussing new ideas for the private sector & subnational governments

i.snoball.itThe Nest Campus 2026 New York | Climate Week NYC Resilience Economy EventSept 22–24, 2026 in New York during Climate Week NYC. Leaders, startups, policymakers and investors meet to shape the resilience economy and drive action.

Former colleagues and I submitted this comment about new proposal to “amend” the last nat’l climate assessment. Basically let’s have a credible process. Could address this and all other new info for NCA6. Disservice to imply high-end climate outcomes are implausible. www.climate.us/news-feature...

climate.usA response from former USGCRP leaders on proposal to revise the Fifth National Climate AssessmentFormer executive director of the U.S. Global Change Science Program and several colleagues describe the rigor of the process that produced NCA5 and

I served as NOAA exec editor of the 2020 Arctic Report Card. Disappointing but not surprising that the current NOAA no longer supports this annual report of the most rapidly changing place on Earth. Arctic changes are important for weather, climate, commerce and national security.

The proposed OMB rule Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance is getting the attention it deserves. Thousands of comments were submitted by yesterday's deadline. The Environmental Protection Network submitted a comprehensive set of comments for anyone interested in a critique of OMB's proposal.

environmentalprotectionnetwork.orgEPN and L4GG Comments on Regulation for Federal Financial AssistanceOn July 13, 2026, Environmental Protection Network and Lawyers for Good Government submitted formal comments opposing the Office of Management and Budget’s proposed regulation governing federal financ...
View full thread

** OMB has not fully considered the economic impacts of the proposal. ** The proposal purports to “restore gold standard science” and promote scientific integrity, including transparency and independent (unbiased) peer review. However, it is difficult to see how it would achieve these objectives.

The proposal would focus political oversight on review of individual research proposals, consuming time that would better be used for high-level leadership. It assumes that political judgement can legitimately supersede objective assessment of merit by multidisciplinary expert peer review.

The proposed OMB rule Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance is getting the attention it deserves. Thousands of comments were submitted by yesterday's deadline. The Environmental Protection Network submitted a comprehensive set of comments for anyone interested in a critique of OMB's proposal.

environmentalprotectionnetwork.orgEPN and L4GG Comments on Regulation for Federal Financial AssistanceOn July 13, 2026, Environmental Protection Network and Lawyers for Good Government submitted formal comments opposing the Office of Management and Budget’s proposed regulation governing federal financ...
View full thread

Agencies cannot simply delegate to OMB their respective authority. These agencies have their respective statutory requirements to implement congressionally-mandated programs, some of which explicitly require scientific peer review to take precedence over political reviews.

The proposed OMB rule Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance is getting the attention it deserves. Thousands of comments were submitted by yesterday's deadline. The Environmental Protection Network submitted a comprehensive set of comments for anyone interested in a critique of OMB's proposal.

environmentalprotectionnetwork.orgEPN and L4GG Comments on Regulation for Federal Financial AssistanceOn July 13, 2026, Environmental Protection Network and Lawyers for Good Government submitted formal comments opposing the Office of Management and Budget’s proposed regulation governing federal financ...

OMB asserts they have the authority to promulgate this regulation by citing statutory language which states that the Deputy Director Manager is able to 'provide overall direction and leadership to the executive branch on financial management matters' but the proposal goes far beyond financial mgmt.

This is good news. When this was first announced it just made no sense and had no scientific or even cost justification.

Andrew Freedman@afreedma.bsky.social

After furious backlash on Capitol Hill and in the scientific community, the Trump Admin's NSF is reversing its decision to dismantle a sprawling ocean observing system. (Note: some damage has already been done, however.) www.cnn.com/2026/06/18/c...

Really enjoyed being back at Penn State for the Climate Solutions Symposium and to contribute ideas for the Prepare PA initiative for my home state. Working on metrics of success for resilience in PA.

I was interviewed for this article. We thought climate adaptation work at EPA would be supported. It's always been and from my experience still is bipartisan. You prepare for change. It's as simple as that. www.eenews.net/articles/ada...

eenews.netAdaptation was supposed to be safe under Zeldin. It didn't turn out that way.The EPA administrator once touted the importance of climate adaptation programs. Now that he's in charge, he's taking a different approach.

I've now wrapped up my first ever class teaching global climate change at Howard University. It was a lot of work doing it for the first time but very fulfilling. The students are great, am proud of the work they did, and am wishing them all the success in the world for the road ahead.

I want to thank my panelists, participants, and student volunteers, again for an insightful #DCClimateWeek event at Howard University. After setting the stage on the urgency of investing in a more resilient future, our panelists shared their expertise about the emerging investability of resilience.

Every lecture for my climate class @Howard I get to cover an interesting topic (ok, in my very humble opinion) but today is one of my favorites: telling the story of the hugely successful Montreal Protocol and how it provided the template -- and unrealistic expectations - for climate negotiations.

Calling all climate resilience people attending DC Climate Week. Save the date for April 24, 4-6pm. Am putting together an event hosted at Howard University, "Investable Resilience: Turning Climate Metrics into Capital." #DCClimateWeek luma.com/kojy9eaa

luma.comInvestable Resilience: Turning Climate Metrics into Capital · LumaThis event is hosted by Howard University. How can we craft adaptation metrics to make the business case for resilience in urban communities? There is a $40+…

Great additional analysis on the EPA repeal of the greenhouse gas endangerment finding from someone who I know knows

Marcus C Sarofim@marcusmarcusrc.bsky.social

I made one more post on Endangerment to address the week's news and the de minimis argument in more depth. Starting next week, I hope to begin posting on non-Endangerment subjects! thesaraphreport.substack.com/p/through-th...

Today's EPA statement says that the endangerment finding was overreach by the Obama Admin. Actually, this process dates back to 1999 when EPA was petitioned to regulate GHGs under the Clean Air Act. That led to 2007 Mass v EPA Supreme Court decision which directed EPA to make a science-based finding

Barack Obama@barackobama.bsky.social

Today, the Trump administration repealed the endangerment finding: the ruling that served as the basis for limits on tailpipe emissions and power plant rules. Without it, we’ll be less safe, less healthy and less able to fight climate change—all so the fossil fuel industry can make even more money.

The Supreme Court, not the Obama EPA, ruled that GHGs are air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. The first draft tech support doc with all supporting science that eventually supported 2009 finding was released for public comment under the Bush Admin.

I'm quoted in this Politico article about the pending repeal of EPA's 2009 GHG endangerment finding which I had a large hand in. We shall see to what extent EPA makes scientific arguments in the repeal. EPA's proposal didn't have compelling scientific justification www.politico.com/news/2026/02...

politico.comTrump EPA to take its biggest swing yet against climate change rulesWith its plans to revoke the endangerment finding, the administration is gambling that the Supreme Court will allow it to completely avoid regulating the nation’s top greenhouse gas sources.

Other arguments from last year's proposal seem to be at odds with the 2007 Mass v EPA Supreme Court decision, which held that GHGs meet the Clean Air Act's definition of an air pollutant and directed EPA to make a science-based decision whether GHGs cause endangerment

This EPA decided not to count benefits of pollution controls. No quantified accounting for avoided morbidity and mortality. This abandons decades of cost-benefit practice, economics and science. Claims that $ benefits estimates are too uncertain don't hold water theconversation.com/epas-new-way...

theconversation.comEPA’s new way of evaluating pollution rules hands deregulators a sledgehammer and license to ignore public healthIn the world of cost benefit analysis, if an impact isn’t monetized, it doesn’t exist. A former EPA official explains what’s changing now and why it matters.

Yesterday I started teaching the undergraduate class on global climate change at Howard University. This is in their Dept of Earth, Environment and Equity. Always wanted to do more teaching after federal service. Honored to be part of Howard in this way!

Gwyneth Fries and I published the blog, the Business Case for Climate Resilience. Businesses and investors need to transition from viewing climate adaptation solely as a risk management strategy to exploring it as a driver of innovation. www.operationfuture.net/blog/the-bus...

operationfuture.netThe Business Case for Climate Resilience — Operation FutureBy Gwyneth Fries and Benjamin DeAngelo Climate action is at an inflection point. Over a decade since the signing of the Paris Agreement, there has been significant but varied momentum b...