Beth Thornburg

Beth Thornburg

@btsmu.bsky.social

Emeritus law professor, civil procedure nerd. Hoping to find my old friends from #LawTwitter. Also interested in supporting museums and other cultural institutions, so needed right now. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=121753

746 followers1.2K following88 posts

This is a perfect example of why judges should not rely on “facts” that have not been tested through adversary presentation by the parties at trial. scholar.smu.edu/law_faculty/...

scholar.smu.eduThe Curious Appellate Judge: Ethical Limits on Independent ResearchAppellate judges in the twenty-first century find themselves in a world in which litigation - both civil and criminal - involves a vast array of complex and technical factual disputes. These lawsuits,...
The New Republic@newrepublic.com

Justice Alito relied on misleading data to support his claim that “Black voters now participate in elections at similar rates as the rest of the electorate." Using the DOJ’s data, Alito omitted the fact that the racial voter gap is actually widening. trib.al/QIDuIYb

And here I thought that Ian McEwan’s “What We Can Know” plot device of militarized AI bringing on the apocalypse was too cute a plot device . . . en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_We...

en.wikipedia.orgWhat We Can Know - Wikipedia
nitasha tiku@nitasha.bsky.social

WSJ reporting that the U.S. used Claude for the air strikes in Iran. Centcom has been using Claude "for intelligence assessments, target identification and simulating battle scenarios" www.wsj.com/livecoverage...

Beth Thornburg reposted

Has anybody figured out how to REALLY turn off Copilot in Word for Mac. I have deselected it but it keeps offering me “improved” drafts that seem to incorporate their editing changes that I don’t want. #AI #ShouldBeOptional

This thread is so heartening. #HandsOff

News Eye@newseye.bsky.social

A quick 🧵of the incredible sights in cities across the USA right now. Millions are on the street speaking out against Trump & Musk trampling the Constitution. Let’s start here with Salt Lake City 😳👏 #HandsOff #HandsOff2025 #FiftyFiftyOne (📸Nate Blouin)

If law schools don’t stand up for the law and train students to do so, it’s a step on the road to “the law is whatever powerful people say it is.”

Joanna Grossman@joannagrossman.bsky.social

I’m proud of the deans who signed this letter. If we don’t stand up for the rule of law, what exactly are we doing in law schools? abovethelaw.com/2025/03/law-...

Beth Thornburg reposted

Good thing that Republicans are here to promote campus free speech

Phil Lewis@phillewis.bsky.social

Linda McMahon, Trump’s nominee for education secretary, said she’s not “quite certain” whether African American studies would be allowed under Trump’s executive order

This may be the scariest so far.

Abe Newman@abenewman.bsky.social

1/ Musk seeking control over nerve systems of the federal government. As someone who spent a decade studying how centralized information systems are used for coercion this is a five alarm fire. We need to name it, identify risks, and seek to mitigate their impacts. www.nytimes.com/2025/02/01/u...

And Leavitt’s tweet is certainly good evidence that the pending lawsuits challenging the freeze are not moot.

Steve Vladeck@stevevladeck.bsky.social

1. The executive orders did *not* freeze federal funding. 2. The Monday OMB memo *did* freeze federal funding. 3. OMB rescinded Monday’s memo, thereby rescinding the funding freeze. 4. The EOs (which did not freeze federal funding) are still in effect—and, for these purposes, irrelevant. Sigh.

Edith Jones’s outrage at legitimate criticism of specific behavior is laughable. Does she have a take on politicians attacking #SoCalledJudges? scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol71/...

scholar.smu.eduTwitter and the #So-CalledJudgeTwo-hundred-eighty characters may be insufficient to deliver a treatise on the judiciary, but it is more than enough to deliver criticism of the third branch of government. Today, these tweeted critiq...
Steve Vladeck@stevevladeck.bsky.social

Seeing media reports portraying yesterday's Fed Soc panel on "judicial independence" in disappointingly equivocal terms. I'm just going to post the full video here and let everyone's behavior speak for itself. I start @ 41:30; Judge Jones @ 50:23; replies @ 1:12:50: www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DBl...

You are up to date.