Carolyn Dicey Jennings

Carolyn Dicey Jennings

@cdj.bsky.social

I study how we direct our own minds through attention and its impact on things like perception, action, & consciousness, now extending to collective attention and digital technologies. PI at philosophydata.org, Editor-in-Chief at philosophymindscience.org

2.9K followers843 following852 posts

We celebrate our philosophy major alumni at #UCMerced with a panoply of owls, created by the majors in our end of year celebration. I’m curious if other departments have arts/crafts projects like this #philsky

The bad omen, for me, was someone reaching out to offer hundreds of dollars an hour in consulting fees for several hours a week if I were just willing to lend my expertise to some AI companies. Seems fine and reasonable for a philosopher in the Central Valley #AIBubble www.npr.org/2026/10/21/n...

npr.orgAn AI chatbot files for bankruptcy. Is it a bad omen for the industry?Character.AI, which lets users create custom chatbots for immersive roleplaying, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy following a string of legal challenges and the loss of top talent.

Carolyn Dicey Jennings reposted

Carolyn Dicey Jennings reposted

1/2 🎇 Good news! 🎇 The kind people at Behavioral and Brain Science have made the new collection on "Conscious AI and biological naturalism" #OpenAccess for a limited time: target article, all 50 commentaries, & my response. Go to the link and click 'save pdf': doi.org/10.1017/S014.... Do share!

Unbelievably, it was 15 years ago I said yes to loving and supporting David, and he to me. It was a beautiful, peaceful morning in Yosemite. We met in the graduate lounge 5 years prior. Most of our friends were philosophers. So, of course, our reception was full of objections/replies. Here is one ❤️

More pictures that show how cute we once were, the best wedding dress of all time (stolen from our porch, then miraculously returned!), as well as my stunning sisters. Needless to say, I take it that David is also a "transcendental condition of the possibility" of my "happy-making powers." To love!

There is something really lovely about someone critically engaging with your work and finding a better version of what you wanted to say. My collaborator Jelle Bruineberg just published "Attention and The Relevance Problem" in PPR a couple of days ago, and I find myself agreeing with his critiques

onlinelibrary.wiley.comAttention and the Relevance ProblemThe relevance problem is the problem of how cognitive systems can be sensitive to what is relevant despite relevance being holistic, open-ended, and context-sensitive. The problem has typically been ...
View full thread

These quotes demonstrate Jelle's interest in "unencapsulation": "agents can be drawn to parts of their environments that are neither relevant for their current activities, nor stand out in virtue of their physical properties, but that are nonetheless relevant for currently latent interests"

There is something really lovely about someone critically engaging with your work and finding a better version of what you wanted to say. My collaborator Jelle Bruineberg just published "Attention and The Relevance Problem" in PPR a couple of days ago, and I find myself agreeing with his critiques

onlinelibrary.wiley.comAttention and the Relevance ProblemThe relevance problem is the problem of how cognitive systems can be sensitive to what is relevant despite relevance being holistic, open-ended, and context-sensitive. The problem has typically been ...

"On my way to the bakery, my friend shows up as salient, as something that demands my attention. But to account for such cases, salience cannot be a purely bottom-up phenomenon. Salience somehow needs to be informed by currently latent interests and goals. The question is how this is possible."

"I fully agree with Jennings that the main function of attention is to organize perception...But ...What is important to an agent can widely diverge from what their current interests are...one of the jobs of passive attention to signal to the agent that it is time to pursue different interests"

UC faculty who are concerned about this can do something: sign this petition, which is about getting us back to the student/faculty ratio UCOP committed to in 2005, which is still way above similar public universities like UMich (names made public only if 1000 sign) members.cucfa.org/sign-the-pet...

members.cucfa.orgSign the Petition - UC Faculty Association
Carolyn Dicey Jennings@cdj.bsky.social

A well reported article that shows the pressure facing UC faculty in recent years. Student body has grown considerably (almost 30% in last 15 years), while faculty growth has been stymied due to “funding shortages,” all while senior management has “more than doubled” www.sacbee.com/news/local/e...

“In 2005, when the ratio of students to tenure-track faculty was 25.5 to 1, UCOP set the preservation of student-faculty ratios as one of its central targets…Unfortunately, the UC did not live up to this goal…This has wide-ranging impacts on faculty workload as well as the quality of education”

cucfa.orgcucfa.org

A well reported article that shows the pressure facing UC faculty in recent years. Student body has grown considerably (almost 30% in last 15 years), while faculty growth has been stymied due to “funding shortages,” all while senior management has “more than doubled” www.sacbee.com/news/local/e...

sacbee.comUC is hitting its enrollment targets. But permanent faculty hiring lagsFaculty say the University of California’s reputation for academic excellence and its contribution to new ideas and innovations is at stake.

“more than two-thirds of early-career faculty reported seriously considering leaving UC or academia altogether…Faculty’s perceptions of their working conditions had shifted negatively in recent years…A mix of workload pressures…and concerns about institutional decline had contributed to this trend.”

Carolyn Dicey Jennings reposted

This is the fucking best game. Made by @nathansen.bsky.social . I have been clicking so furiously that my wrist is basically broken. And then I sent an AI bot to go do my clicks for me so I can click papers into existence and send them to premier journals like Noesis and Morals. Have fun!

ux-phi.comSubmission — a ux-phi gameWrite papers, send them to journals, survive peer review. A clicker game about academic publishing.

This years fellows include the wonderful @felipedebrigard.bsky.social ! Congrats, Felipe! This is also huge for philosophy, which rarely sees recipients of this fellowship #philsky

NPR@npr.org

A historian who studies wage gaps between races and a saxophonist whose live performances include a chef are among the latest recipients of the philanthropic group's annual, no-strings-attached $800,000 grants. n.pr/4hsdMIs

Me too! 2016 was the last/first time for me, incredibly. I managed to remember in time to catch the poster submission window 😮‍💨 Looking forward to catching up with all you philsci peeps!

Sarah Wieten@sarahwieten.bsky.social

For the first time since 2018 (!?!?) I am going to the PSA in San Diego in November! The program looks amazing. Really looking forward to the new work and seeing everyone. psa26.oa-event.com

This one resonates, and is relevant for philosophers I think: “Maybe I’m a bad actor. Definitely sometimes. You gotta be a bad actor to be a good actor, I’m convinced. The ones that are good all the time are no good. They’re at a safe level.” #philsky

Carolyn Dicey Jennings reposted

The paper is not very convincing imho.

Science Magazine@science.org

Can the new cutting-edge AI models feel pain? They at least behave as if they do, according to a recent study. The work, which has not been peer reviewed, has divided #AI researchers. https://scim.ag/4hHU6BA

Starting to read the preprint. I noted: “physical pain is least central to models’ pain representations.” One explanation for that is that physical pain isn’t captured in word associations. The model’s “pain” seems to be largely about model integrity, eg “uselessness,” which would be so captured.

Kate Devlin@drkatedevlin.bsky.social

Hey you guys, Weizenbaum called and he said: "how easy it is to create and maintain the illusion of understanding, hence perhaps of judgment deserving of credibility. A certain danger lurks there."

View full thread

And for those who think these discussions are a distraction: I get it, but consider, too, how the label of personhood influenced the political protection of corporations…these issues matter, and good to sort out the basics if we can, as well as the ethical/political ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.ph...

ojs.stanford.edu The Influential Authority of the Corporation: How Citizens United v. FEC Redefined Legal Personhood, Political Jurisdiction, and the Societal Paradigm | SURJ: The Stanford Undergraduate Rese...

Starting to read the preprint. I noted: “physical pain is least central to models’ pain representations.” One explanation for that is that physical pain isn’t captured in word associations. The model’s “pain” seems to be largely about model integrity, eg “uselessness,” which would be so captured.

Kate Devlin@drkatedevlin.bsky.social

Hey you guys, Weizenbaum called and he said: "how easy it is to create and maintain the illusion of understanding, hence perhaps of judgment deserving of credibility. A certain danger lurks there."

That is, it likely makes a difference to other words used if someone reports being useless (but not in physical pain, I’m imagining). Not hard to see how “uselessness” could come to be dispreferred through training, either because of these associations or because of a meta-association with the model

Carolyn Dicey Jennings reposted

Now published in @natcomms.nature.com! Using a 3D immersive-reality group experiment, we show how people integrate dynamically changing personal and social cues in realistic environments, resulting in either collective intelligence or maladaptive behavior! Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Dominik Deffner@dominikdeffner.bsky.social

Which processes underlie collective intelligence in naturalistic human groups? In new work led by Valerii Chirkov, we show that payoff selectivity is key in transforming a group of individuals into an intelligent collective 🤝🧠 www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY7n... Preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps...

Carolyn Dicey Jennings reposted

Excellent survey of the variety of views on artificial consciousness My contribution draws on the importance of unity for conscious experience & suggests this depends on the metabolic unity of an organism: leaflet.pub/p/did:plc:ct... Thanks to @anilseth.bsky.social for such a rich target article!

leaflet.pubAbsolute Units: The metabolic basis of the experiential selfCommentary on Seth (2025): Unity is intrinsic to being both an experiencing and an embodied subject. Computational accounts of consciousness, being observer-relative, cannot account for this unity. The thermodynamics of life can but, contra Seth’s suggestion, the free energy principle fails to capture the distinctive metabolic interdependencies by virtue of which a living system constitutes itself as a unified perspective on the world.
Anil Seth@anilseth.bsky.social

6/ And the set of 50 commentaries are collected here: cambridge.org/core/journal... Unfortunately these are not open access. I will try to remedy that, at least for the target & response

Why are people so confident that if the results of AI look like thinking that this means the thinking is being done by what’s in the box, rather than by what’s in the diagram as a whole? Are they just not considering this as a possibility? Don’t believe in the possibility of collective cognition?

A bad analogy: if we heat up ice and it melts, we don’t infer that the heating element has the property of wetness, or even that it is the exclusive/primary source of wetness, but that it helped bring it about.

I have found today productive for understanding the landscape of some of the views non-philosophers might have about AI. Thanks to those who helped me with that. I am finding more recent engagement somewhat less productive, so I am signing off on this one. Open to new threads/emails if want to chat.

Carolyn Dicey Jennings@cdj.bsky.social

Genuinely confused as to what could be behind this take. What do other #philmind people think? Is this driven by an (incorrect) assumption that “metaphysical” is equivalent to “non-physical”? If so, maybe the idea is that if understanding is physical then AI can do it? But that ignores biology.

Time to block. I really tried productive engagement. Not necessarily for him, but for others to see what could be going wrong (and for me to learn as well). But I won’t tolerate this kind of comment.

Cross post

Carolyn Dicey Jennings@cdj.bsky.social

Should be clear as day to him that the problem isn’t philosophers, given his replies. I think I touched a nerve with some of the back and forth in my thread; no one likes to be looked down upon, and psychologizing is doing that by setting aside their rational self. So my bad for doing that openly.