Chad Woodford

Chad Woodford

@cosmic.diamonds

Philosopher, Cosmologist, AI Ethicist & Tech Lawyer⁣⁣ bio.site/cosmicwit

378 followers295 following364 posts

Pinned

Just setting up my bluesky. I'm a former #AI researcher and software engineer, and current technology lawyer and AI philosopher with a masters in philosophy, cosmology and consciousness. I am interested in the intersection of #technology, #philosophy, and #humanity.

Chad Woodford reposted

It's important to remember that the AI doom scenario assumes not only that intelligence is a single well-defined thing, but also that intelligence solves literally every single problem, and that in every conflict overwhelming intelligence always wins. This is just not how anything works.

Chad Woodford reposted

Going on record to say that for any company in America given the choice between 1. AI productivity gains mean our 10,000 employees can work 4 days a week. 2. AI productivity gains mean we can layoff 2,000 employees and have 8,000 people work 5 days a week. None will choose option (1).

"In the future, every former AI lab employee will be famous for 15 excruciating days." — Andy Warhol Bot

The Daily Show@thedailyshow.com

Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon describes how AI-fueled universal income might look

Data portability opens up a whole new world when combined with vibe coding. I just exported all my LinkedIn data and, after creating a few apps to interact and analyze it, I'm finding LinkedIn useful for possibly the first time in my life.

View full thread

Telemetry alert. Social friction detected. Suggest de-escalating with a shared observation about atmospheric pressure. So I panic. And what comes out of my mouth—unprompted, at eight o'clock in the morning—is:

CASEY: Kevin. I froze. The latency on my own central nervous system spiked to 1,500 milliseconds. So instead of just ordering my drink, I lock eyes with this poor man for five full seconds in total silence, while the AI in my ear is going:

Chad Woodford reposted

It's too depressing and obnoxious to write about, but virtually all of the doomy/horny AI hyperventilating is transparently displaced anxiety about our fucked climate and political situation. Even rich idiots know it's bad and being permitted to get worse. They're trying to write their own ending.

Chad Woodford reposted

I do think you basically charge a few of them with the cybercrimes they're committing and the "alignment" problem does suddenly start to disappear.

Chad Woodford reposted

This Jacob Coxon thing is weird. He worked at Anthropic for six weeks and OpenAI for nearly three years. He’s doing a whole media tour without any real statements about what it is he’s scared of other than vague references to recursive self improvement, a theoretical ai that teaches itself.

Carl Quintanilla@carlquintanilla.bsky.social

ANTHROPIC EXEC: “.. I personally think it is >10% within the next decade.”

Chad Woodford reposted

You’ve gotta use AI because it’s the future. But also it’ll take your job. But also it’ll create a paradise on earth and solve most of our problems. But also it’ll end humanity soon. But also you’ll get left behind if you don’t use it right now.

I've started using Claude more for personal use and hit my usage limit just now. So Claude prompted me to upgrade to Pro, which I did. And then it said I still have to wait 5 hours to use it? What kind of cockamamie user journey is this?

A random guy on Substack just said my writing sounds like AI slop. So now I'm wondering if reading too much LLM output has affected my writing, or if I'm even human...

The ease with which an Aschenbrenner or a Kokotajlo can simply write an AI manifesto, become an AI oracle, and even make a bunch of money speaks to the very bubbly nature of AI right now.

With the new Neuromancer series coming out on Apple TV, you just know that Sam Altman is going to tweet cryptically "wintermute" and then OpenAI will release a model called Wintermute #TormentNexus

The fact that Descartes thought animals were machines with no internal experience says a lot about the kind of machine thinking that has haunted Western civilization ever since. And it explains why AI bros think LLMs might be conscious.

In this whole AI welfare / AI consciousness debate, it’s important to remember that science has been unconcerned with the nature of consciousness for most of its history, going back to Galileo.

View full thread

A few years later, philosopher David Chalmers coined the term “hard problem of consciousness” to underscore how little science understands consciousness and how it’s produced by the brain. Cognitive science and neuroscience then began to take an interest.

But it’s essentially a complete mystery. Sure, there are neuroscientific theories. But nothing empirically proven. So when the AI labs and their philosophers make these bold claims about machine consciousness, they’re not doing science. They’re doing science fiction. #AI #consciousness

In this whole AI welfare / AI consciousness debate, it’s important to remember that science has been unconcerned with the nature of consciousness for most of its history, going back to Galileo.

Science only turned its gaze toward legitimate questions of consciousness in the 1990s, when Nobel laureate Francis Crick (of DNA helix fame) co-authored a paper proposing a search for the neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) in the brain.

But it's using the same tokens inside and outside the J-space so it's using words, at least the same "words" that Claude uses for everything else.

This NYT puff piece is a great example of the blind spot in Silicon Valley philosophy: Not only do the major AI labs only employ exclusively analytic Western philosophers prone to embrace the mind-is-machine metaphor,

I guess because of America's 250th anniversary, I've been thinking about how, unlike the Enlightenment or space-age myths of utopian progress, we don't have any animating, shared, inspirational myths anymore.

I think this is what's behind antisocial trends like: 1. self optimizing + biohacking 2. hustle culture, crypto, prediction markets, and dreams of passive income 3. MAGA, TradWives, raw milk, etc. What to do?

Chad Woodford reposted

While his mountain of horrible personal conduct could fill multiple books, one fact in particular stands out: A year ago, Musk’s actions directly led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. He did it knowingly. And, worse — gleefully. Read more: www.theverge.com/tech/949259/...

I’ve slowly been working my way through Edward Said’s 1978 book Orientialism, a book about the ways that Europe tried to define the “Orient” for its own purposes and through its own distorted lens.

In the book there’s a passage where Said is talking about how much various texts informed the European view of Asia and the Middle East. Said reminds us that it’s too easy to mistake a text for an accurate map of reality:

"[I]t is a fallacy to assume that the swarming, unpredictable, and problematic mess in which human beings live can be understood on the basis of what books—texts—say; to apply what one learns out of a book literally to reality is to risk folly or ruin." And of course this has me thinking about LLMs

Mainstream AI acts as a worldview entrenchment machine. Trained on Eurocentric data, it flattens thousands of years of distinct human traditions into generic statistical weights. But wisdom isn't an emergent property of a massive web-scrape. [1/3]

That’s why I’m in Bhutan this week. As a nation never physically colonized, they retain a unique ideological shield against Western modernity. They aren't anti-tech; they are using Gross National Happiness (GNH) to build a relational paradigm for tech. [2/3]