Cris van Eijk

Cris van Eijk

@crisveijk.bsky.social

International law, the (space) commons, and how they're made. PhD @newcastleuni.bsky.social | 🇺🇸🇳🇱🏳️‍🌈 | 🔊: krɪs van aɪk | he/him https://www.ncl.ac.uk/law/study/research/students/current-pgr-students/cristian-van-eijk/

1.7K followers1.5K following1.3K posts

Aaand we have it, folks; we’ve completed our set of state responsibility modes! Even conduct by a private actor can become breach attributable to a state if that state “acknowledges” / “adopts” that conduct afterwards. Like by spending a few days falsely claiming that *they’d* ordered the conduct.

This post is unavailable.

Very nice of them to run through the checklist of modes of state responsibility one by one - a very belt-and-suspenders approach to crisis mismanagement, with notes of core genuine legal fuckup. bsky.app/profile/cris...

Cris van Eijk@crisveijk.bsky.social

The intl legal basis for US state responsibility for any breaches of intl law amounting from SpaceX’s conduct here was clear from Art VI OST. Now there’s likely a customary basis too (per the ILC ARSIWA, ICJ) - not only by US instruction (test 1), but *also* via US effective control (test 2).

Cris van Eijk reposted

After 2 days in close proximity (less than 5 km, possibly much less), Kosmos-2612 moved away from ICEYE X36 on Oct 18 and is now more than 100 km away, according to US Space Force tracking data

Jonathan McDowell@planet4589.bsky.social

This afternoon's orbital data suggests - subject to confirmation - that Russia's Kosmos-2612 has carried out a rendezvous with the US ICEYE X36 radar sat, within a few km. To my knowledge this is the first LEO rendezvous of two active sats where the owner of one of the sats did not give approval.

If you're ever having a bad day at work, just know you are not having as bad a day at work as these specific federal attorneys, facing potential sanction for arguing so dumbly....

Roger Parloff@rparloff.bsky.social

Reyes was talking about "Rule 11," which is a provision of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that allows judges to impose sanctions for frivolous arguments etc. In the filing, Woodward argued that closing & transforming the existing golf course was "not final agency action"... /51

Tied for one of my fav novels last year, a mainstay recommendation, you finish reading it and think 'huh, wait, why am I suddenly a furious & sapphic anarchist???', 11/10

Workers’ Lit Podcast@workerslit.bsky.social

LET'S GO LESBIANS!!! This week the great @amalelmohtar.com joined us to talk about "Metal From Heaven," a truly wild novel about building parallel power structures, workers' uprisings, lesbian sex, gender, and becoming Commie Jesus. Listen for free wherever you get your podcasts!!

Roger Parloff@rparloff.bsky.social

Judge Reyes is ordering Woodward to refile submission from last night with as many DOJ attys willing to sign it. J: DOJ attys: raise your hand if you youj're willing to sign it. Woodward: not an appropriate request. J: right now, for rule 11 purposes, which other attys willing to sign this brief /6

Omg-

Roger Parloff@rparloff.bsky.social

All rise. Reyes on bench. J: trust everyone's weekend was as relaxing as mine and my clerks. [sarcastic] [clerk calling case] Attys giving appearances. Mark Samburg for plaintiffs ... Norm Eisen ... Abbe Lowell DOJ: Stan Woodward; Andrew Block, Robert Stander, Marissa Pilopato. ... /5

Cris van Eijk reposted

Really interesting discussion here of SpaceX's play to become a wireless carrier, the long strange history of how they got the 800 Mhz spectrum rights, and what challenge this may pose for traditional wireless carriers www.theverge.com/podcast/1012...

theverge.comSpaceX’s ambitious, pricey gamble to replace AT&T and VerizonWhy Elon Musk’s rocket company and satellite internet provider is moving fast into the cell carrier business and spending billions to take on AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile.

Cris van Eijk reposted

This is high-key my approach to international law!! I cannot overstate the sheer number of Boring Syllabus Cases that were in fact a series of WILD shenanigans!! Guys, someone shot *a bazooka* at the UNHQ in 1964. I've done 3.5 degrees in intl law, but I learned this from the NYT timesmachine.

m. r. sauter@oddletters.bsky.social

this is why i tell students that if they are, like me, a messy bitch who loves drama they should become historians

Cris van Eijk reposted

Replying to @crisveijk.bsky.social

See also: Nicaragua v US was a prestige limited series drama about Abram Chayes' loss of / quest to restore faith in his country... by becoming the first person to sue their own state at the ICJ. His opposing counsel *was his former student*!! The State Dept he once advised *removed his portrait*!!

This is high-key my approach to international law!! I cannot overstate the sheer number of Boring Syllabus Cases that were in fact a series of WILD shenanigans!! Guys, someone shot *a bazooka* at the UNHQ in 1964. I've done 3.5 degrees in intl law, but I learned this from the NYT timesmachine.

m. r. sauter@oddletters.bsky.social

this is why i tell students that if they are, like me, a messy bitch who loves drama they should become historians

See also: Nicaragua v US was a prestige limited series drama about Abram Chayes' loss of / quest to restore faith in his country... by becoming the first person to sue their own state at the ICJ. His opposing counsel *was his former student*!! The State Dept he once advised *removed his portrait*!!

His first witness - as in, the first witness Chayes ever examined in his *whole career*.... in a case suing the US govt for foreign intervention - was *also* the first [known] former CIA agent to ever take the ICJ stand. 👀 A hostile witness, indeed. Oh, and he won so hard the US ragequit the ICJ.

@sylviademars.me 👀🔥🫡

Joyce White Vance@joycewhitevance.bsky.social

1/ Overnight, Judge Reyes denied the government’s motion to disqualify her from continuing to hear the East Potomac Park golf course case. They argued she demonstrated bias against the government and portrayed her as overly emotional. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Cris van Eijk reposted

Today’s the day! Let’s go Japan—we all crave little pieces of the alien fear moon. 😨 🌑 🚀

Dr Robin George Andrews@squigglyvolcano.bsky.social

NEW: On Oct 20, Japan will launch its most audacious space mission. It’s hoping to fly to Mars, land twice (!) on Phobos (“fear”), steal pieces of that alien moon, and bring ‘em home. That’s right: to pull of this heist, Japan must confront fear itself. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

Cris van Eijk reposted

Replying to @crisveijk.bsky.social

The Mail has ironically parroted like, the ur-textual version of "men will literally do anything besides go to therapy", framed as a national security threat "Ne’er pull your hat upon your brows. Give sorrow words. The grief that does not speak Whispers the o’erfraught heart and bids it break."

The Mail misquotes Macbeth here - a scene where Macduff, here the avatar of moral good & righteousness, explicitly shows it by welcoming a stranger as kin: MACDUFF: See, who comes here? MALCOLM: My countryman, but yet I know him not. MACDUFF: My ever-gentle cousin, welcome hither.

Peter Whitewood@pwhitewood.bsky.social

Prejudices so suppressed they can only be ‘whispered’ in a national newspaper.

View full thread

That is, the exact scene The Mail misquotes here is *extremely about* how "a man" should best process his feelings of grief and grievance, and must do so, to ensure a better, more open-hearted country. MALCOLM: "Dispute it like a man.” MACDUFF: "I shall do so, But I must also feel it as a man.”

The Mail has ironically parroted like, the ur-textual version of "men will literally do anything besides go to therapy", framed as a national security threat "Ne’er pull your hat upon your brows. Give sorrow words. The grief that does not speak Whispers the o’erfraught heart and bids it break."

The Mail misquotes Macbeth here - a scene where Macduff, here the avatar of moral good & righteousness, explicitly shows it by welcoming a stranger as kin: MACDUFF: See, who comes here? MALCOLM: My countryman, but yet I know him not. MACDUFF: My ever-gentle cousin, welcome hither.

Peter Whitewood@pwhitewood.bsky.social

Prejudices so suppressed they can only be ‘whispered’ in a national newspaper.

Then comes this: "Alas, poor country! Almost afraid to know itself. It cannot Be called our mother, but our grave, where nothing, But who knows nothing, is once seen to smile; Where sighs and groans and shrieks that rend the air Are made, not marked; where violent sorrow seems A modern ecstasy."

Cris van Eijk reposted

Brendan Larsen from Ngāmotu in Aotearoa and a member of the New Plymouth Astronomical Society took this stack over a couple of hours and estimates 14000 satellite trails. This is how bad it is now, it's set to get much much much worse - and then we lose Low […] [Original post on river.geek.nz]

The intl legal basis for US state responsibility for any breaches of intl law amounting from SpaceX’s conduct here was clear from Art VI OST. Now there’s likely a customary basis too (per the ILC ARSIWA, ICJ) - not only by US instruction (test 1), but *also* via US effective control (test 2).

Giorgi Revishvili@revishvili.bsky.social

Elon Musk came to Donald Trump with the plan to throttle Ukraine’s use of SpaceX’s Starshield satellite internet network, sources have told the Telegraph. The tech billionaire made the proposal during the US President’s row with Volodymyr Zelensky over strikes on Russian oil refineries. 1/3

I’m not claiming any breaches here - just attribution. But if this scoop is indeed sufficient to conclude the US’ effective control, the result is that US state responsibility *also* extends to any breaches resulting from SpaceX’s *ultra vires* conduct, too. Washington, come get your man…

Cris van Eijk reposted

I hope Dem leadership is ready to go to the mattresses here. They haven't in the past when it comes to Ilhan Omar.

Kyle Griffin@kylegriffin1.bsky.social

BREAKING WSJ: The Trump admin's investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar is aimed at building a case to strip her of her U.S. citizenship and ultimately deport her, according to U.S. officials and other people familiar with the probe.

Cris van Eijk reposted

Every day I wake up and wonder if today is the day that something like this will happen to me.

Mark Grimshaw@markgrimshawtism.bsky.social

Janet Murray is now publicly harassing a random trans woman for choosing to get gender affirming surgery, and her real life friend for donating some money towards funding it. Janet works for the Telegraph and the Mail. This is the state of British journalism. Harassing people for being trans.

*Lanterns spoilers* I’ve seen a few ‘why did John give her money’ takes on the timelines and Guys, it’s a reparations narrative. John (unintentionally, but meaningfully) contributed to levelling a town / killing people. The main culprit served time, came back; John left w/o repair, & then thrived.

They are emphasising reparations via core principles - like repairing harm done to a place, people, & community, based on impact & contribution, not guilt or intent. There is meaning to the notion that reparation is community-based & systemic, but feels individual as hell for those involved.

The usual Pr*me or CBS version of this show would have their male lead stare deeply into the middle distance, and say like, “yeah, kid. We all lost a part of ourselves that day” as music swelled. That would be it. Kid’s college fund, the one that went to rebuild a new house, would still be spent.

Cris van Eijk reposted

Replying to @jstpwalsh.bsky.social

I bought my rhizomatic, antihierarchical, deeply interrelational go-to-work machine from the richest man alive, wait why are you laughing no stop laughing hold on-

Cris van Eijk reposted

Replying to @crisveijk.bsky.social

It's perhaps *not* a coincidence that maybe the EU's most protective & far-reaching consumer rights protection regime *also* happens to be the system hundreds of EU legislators rely on to get to/from work. >_>

Cris van Eijk reposted

A lot of things make me feel kind of dumb, including how to take at face value the logic of “we are a multibillion dollar transnational industry building a vengeful elder god, and we definitely won’t stop unless you regulate us the way we want, which is a secret.”

There's a reason traffic lights don't use a tiered subscription model where only the RedLight+ subscribers can see *all* the other cars on the road. Except, in this analogy, the cars drive at ~27,000km/h, and most are coming at you from angles approaching 180°. And you drive via dial-up trailcam.

This is a crucial gap between proper EIAs (including public data release, public participation, & peer review) vs US space licensing regimes, where the govt accepts SpaceX's proprietary, processed, opaque data, then nods sagely & reaches for the APPROVED stamp.