Thaddeus
Thaddeus reposted
This is state-sponsored media shit. Absolutely, shocking, insane dictator overreach
#BREAKING: Sinclair says it will air a one-hour tribute to Charlie Kirk on its ABC-affiliated stations in the time slot that is usually occupied for "Jimmy Kimmel Live." The special will air on Friday, per a Sinclair spokesperson.
Noting for the record that the @espiers.bsky.social piece on Charlie Kirk was word- and pitch-perfect. Any freedom-loving institution should have been proud to publish or fund it. www.elizabethspiers.com/whatta-week-...
Crazy. And crazy-making. Nothing that any commentator of prominence has said about Kirk compares in offensiveness to any number of things that Kirk said over many years. We’re being asked to believe not just that up is down, but that up is the wisest, kindest, most generous down that ever lived.
genuinely crazy that this is happening on behalf of charlie kirk of all people
Stop acting like a Nazi. Stop acting like a fascist. Thank you for playing “Easy Answers to Hard Question.“
Vance: "What is it that you want people to do when you call them 'Nazis'? What is it that you want them to do when you call them 'fascist'?...This rhetoric is completely out of control and it's part of this entire network of violence that exists on the far-left."
We live in an Orwell Moment, when plain speaking about unpleasant political facts is strangely rare and uniquely valuable—when simple truths, simply told, can have a marvelous tonic effect, even many people deem them hard to swallow. (Orwellian times, of course, open space for an Orwell Moment.) 1/3
Example 1, from Paul Campos at @lawgunsmoney.bsky.social: Campos, a law professor, points out that SCOTUS is making a mockery of the traditional approach to professing the law. www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2025/09/the-...
Example 2, from Mark Jacob at www.stopthepresses.news: Jacob, a former newspaperman, observes that most mainstream news media goes out of its way NOT to report the most obvious and important fact of our time. www.stopthepresses.news/p/why-wont-t...
There will be many breaking points before it’s all over (“it” being the Trump-MAGA regime, but like Paul Campos, I feel that we’ve reached a big in Aug-Sep 2025. www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2025/09/alte...
“Politics,” Steve Bannon said, “is downstream of culture.” When he’s right, he’s right! This sharp piece delves into the meaning of the larger MAGA project, a key part of which involves using a kitsch aesthetic to eliminate every vestige of liberalism. www.vox.com/politics/459...
Brilliantly said. I totally agree with @mehdirhasan.bsky.social. Sweeping out top congressional Dem leaders is a necessary step forward. Yet it’s far from sufficient. It’s far from clear the leaders who would replace Schumer and Jeffries would be much better. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
Why we are where we are, in 10 indelible words: “You can't policy your way out of a propaganda problem!”
I'm kind of shocked that anyone is still proposing technocratic solutions to the "debate" over immigration. Even if this were a good idea (and it is not), Republican elites and media will never tell their base about it. You can't policy your way out of a propaganda problem!
For years, the whole phenomenon of Donald Trump has flabbergasted me—because, as this great comment at @lawgunsmoney.bsky.social notes, he embodies every villain trope in modern American popular culture. Again and again,I just want to scream: This guy? www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2025/09/no-m...
Great thread. Very smart to connect “deliverism” with Dem leaders‘ current hapless strategy on the funding battle. Common denominator: Congressional Dems cling to the outdated idea that their primary task is legislation. No! It’s all about the info battle. It’s all about the war for attention.
Shrewd analysis by @joshtpm.bsky.social of feckless Senate Dem maneuvering. "Democrats are in a battle for everything. Helping Republicans remain in total power in Washington, DC in exchange for momentary relief is not the answer." talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/there...
Amid so many other horrors, renaming a govt dept hardly matter even as a point of trivia. And yet ... At a time when the regime is escalating—and conflating—the War on Terror (tm) and the War on Drugs (tm), going big on the "war" idea strikes an ominous tone. (1) www.nytimes.com/2025/09/04/u...
Then there's this—the glib dismissal, by Trump and (implicitly) by @nytimes.com, of the core principle that this kind of change must originate, and be deliberated, in Congress. The road to dictatorship is being paved with dozens of casually accepted assertions of unconstitutional power.
Important piece by @brianbeutler.bsky.social. Come for this great line: "The future is unwritten, but death remains certain." Stay for a provocative meditation on how Dems should publicly remember Trump when he's gone. www.offmessage.net/p/if-trump-d...
"I refuse to pretend that any of this is normal.” This, this, this! Since January 20, I’ve been waiting for prominent Dems to commit to this simple, necessary principle.
Pritzker: "I refuse to pretend that any of this is normal ... I refuse to fall into the pundit trap that demands we sacrifice vital constitutional rights if it's being done in the fake guise of fighting crime."
Thaddeus reposted
The president is tweeting videos of his extrajudicial murders for the sake of entertaining his hordes of followers who cry out for enemy blood.
Here's the video Trump just posted to Truth Social, with the claim that 11 people aboard the boat were killed. There is zero evidence of self-defense here. Looks like a massacre of civilians at sea. Even if they had drugs aboard, that's not a capital offense.
How it started (in the coinage of a certain 14-word phrase). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourtee...
Brilliant thread by @anatosaurus.bsky.social. It’s ALL about attention. And for a political party today, the only way to gain and keep attention is to show that you’ll fight for people. Damn talk far too much about “distraction“ and not nearly enough about the laws of (political) attraction.
Messaging fascist power grabs as "distraction" fails to recognize politics is a shouting match not a soliloquy. Pivot to "but our prices" means you're not going to be heard. Further, you have to prove not just Trump's hurting you, but that Dems would fight back. www.cnn.com/2025/08/31/p...
Thaddeus reposted
It’s truly a wretched, feckless editorial. But it has the virtue of offering a window into the institutional mindset that engenders NYT‘s mealy-mouthed, collaborationist coverage of Trump on both news and editorial pages. 1/2
Holy shit. I knew this @nytimes.com editorial would be bad, but it's so much worse than I could have imagined. I mean, it is indistinguishable from a parody of reactionary centrism. This is every center-left pathology, laid out for your examination.
If @nytimes.com reporters didn’t have liberals to kick around, how would they fill the empty spot in the pit of their souls? As a survey of what’s happening, it’s a decent piece. But NYT can’t help but frame it in terms of how libs and Dems are doing it wrong. 1/2 www.nytimes.com/2025/05/01/u...
Incisive, useful effort to convert general, angst-ridden despair over [gesticulates manically] *all this* into a review of specific unconstitutional and anti-constitutional steps taken by Trump and his regime.
If you've ever found yourself thinking, 'That can’t be constitutional' after one of Trump’s executive orders or deportations, you're not wrong. This piece breaks down the five core constitutional principles Trump has taken a wrecking ball to, so we can better fight back against the threat he poses.