Michael J. Taylor

Michael J. Taylor

@drmichaeljtaylor.bsky.social

Associate Professor, University at Albany SUNY Greek and Roman History PhD UC Berkeley

3.3K followers283 following947 posts

Michael J. Taylor reposted

A personal anecdote about Chris Wickham, whose passing - like everyone in our field - comes as shocking news. Other people will be able to replicate this with myriads of their own examples. In the spring of 2016, I was spending three months in the Belgian Academy of Rome on a modest stipend.

Rory Naismith@rorynaismith.bsky.social

(Shared from various people on FB) RIP Chris Wickham

One of the fundamental failures of higher ed leadership is caring about the inputs of research (grants) over the outputs (published research).

Another way to put this is that the status of the humanities in R1/R2 US universities are just as dependent on external funding as STEM (whether in the form of grants or private endowment capital); there's just so much less of it for the humanities, which is why we suffer.

Impeach Hegseth

The Washington Post@washingtonpost.com

Exclusive: More American service members have died in the Middle East during the ongoing Iran war than the Pentagon has disclosed publicly, according to six U.S. officials familiar with the data.

Thersites the Historian gets the only vote that counts because its his show, but I'd love to drone on about the Social War, THE turning point (mostly very bad!) in Republican history.

Borners@borners.bsky.social

I love these videos with @drmichaeljtaylor.bsky.social , but I really really want to Dr Taylor give us "Social War is the real turning point of the Republican era army not the non-existant Marian reforms" online lecture version of his @bretdevereaux.bsky.social post. www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZGO...

Michael J. Taylor reposted

So I recall remarking a while back at the MET had two iron kopides that I was *sure* couldn't have been completely legally acquired (they stopped answering my emails when I asked about provenance) given their acquisition date and I check back on them and what do I see? LOL. ROFL. ROFLMAO, even.

Yes. Also, the whole “mentor” schtick worked when there were actually jobs for grad students to go into. For most, grad school is the academic career, performing labor that sustains the entire enterprise.

This post is unavailable.

Michael J. Taylor reposted

Replying to @ardentreader.bsky.social

Extending this further, it’s also Hegseth intentionally humiliating the military out of resentment at only being an alcoholic National Guard major limited in both intelligence and management skills that couldn’t truly make a career out of the military.

Michael J. Taylor reposted

This is an important question but very difficult to answer. A thread on the Christianization of the Roman _State_ which by proxy gives us some insight on the Christianization of the Roman _World_

Matt Gabriele@profgabriele.com

I know the era of mass conversion to Christianity didn't happen until at least the 4th century, but is there a point at which we can definitively say that the Roman world was MAJORITY Christian? #medievalsky

Michael J. Taylor reposted

Replying to @bretdevereaux.bsky.social

Apologies if I sound angry, but it is a real problem that the 'smart' commentary on this war is trying hard to avoid the core lesson ("the president is a fucking moron") because it doesn't sound very clever when it is absolutely the most important takeaway from this debacle.

Chuds are gonna chud, but I would note there is a very clear mechanism for ensuring faculty stay current in their field---it's called research output. We freely share our CVs! You can go see the last time I published an article in a scholarly journal! (June 2026, cough cough).

This post is unavailable.

And yes, different institutions provide different levels of research support. But a curious college student should be able to figure out their professors research interests and recent research activity through a simple google search. We most certainly do not try to keep that stuff secret.

And if you want it quantified, google scholars metrics, while biased towards the sciences, do offer some sense of frequency and intensity of citation. Imperfect, yes, but more informative than how well I score on high school geometry (which is what the GRE does).

Michael J. Taylor reposted

A good day to remember that one of the indictments against George III in the Declaration was, "He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither"

Michael J. Taylor reposted

trans rights are human rights and nothing will change that, no matter what a bunch of unelected law wizards and bigoted legislators say

The paper version just arrived!

Michael J. Taylor@drmichaeljtaylor.bsky.social

Thrilled to announce publication with @dominicmachado.bsky.social of our article: "The Carthaginian Masters: Settler Colonialism and Racecraft in Ancient North Africa" Arethusa 59: 151-178. We destroy Carthage one more time, only with theory. muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/articl...

A draft map of the Battle of Second Herdonia, 210 BC. Hannibal envelopes a poorly deployed Roman army besieging Herdonia. Based on the brief narrative of Livy 27. 1 (also App. Han. 48 and Fronteinus 2.5.21. Terrain explains why the legions and Ala were not deployed abreast.

Ancient historian thoughts on Iran mess. One thing that always struck me about the Hellenistic kingdoms is how quickly they surrender. These are kings who build up their whole self-definition about being good at war, but they quit as soon as they lose a battle.

View full thread

I'm not a constitutional scholar, but I suspect we need a war powers constitutional amendment, which makes it so that military officers who engage in Congressionally unauthorized wars can be prosecuted without statute of limitations (and ineligible for Presidential pardons).

Ancient historian thoughts on Iran mess. One thing that always struck me about the Hellenistic kingdoms is how quickly they surrender. These are kings who build up their whole self-definition about being good at war, but they quit as soon as they lose a battle.

View full thread

Currently there is massive flaw in the US Constitution that a President could launch such an illegal war in the first place. The fact that there hasn't ben a declaration of war since 1942 suggests the problem goes beyond just Trump, although he's clearly the worst actor.

But the whole point of Congressional authorization is it suggests that there is a critical mass of popular support for a war. Which means the US would be more likely to avoid wars it can't win and shouldn't fight. And force politicians to build consent in a way that makes it more likely we win.

Ancient historian thoughts on Iran mess. One thing that always struck me about the Hellenistic kingdoms is how quickly they surrender. These are kings who build up their whole self-definition about being good at war, but they quit as soon as they lose a battle.

View full thread

Ancient historian thoughts on Iran mess. One thing that always struck me about the Hellenistic kingdoms is how quickly they surrender. These are kings who build up their whole self-definition about being good at war, but they quit as soon as they lose a battle.

View full thread

The main reason the Romans are able to absorb defeat after defeat is the simple fact they are a republic. Yes, other factors too, but republics/democracies are more resilient because you have political mechanisms to mobilize collective action and express popular will.

The US is still a democracy, albeit under grave threat. But Trump himself governs like an autocrat---not seeking consent, surrounding himself with a team of hacks and lackeys, and demanding his same party congress behave like a docile Duma.

Ancient historian thoughts on Iran mess. One thing that always struck me about the Hellenistic kingdoms is how quickly they surrender. These are kings who build up their whole self-definition about being good at war, but they quit as soon as they lose a battle.

This is an illustration of the brittleness of military autocracy. The politics are boastful but brittle. And once you lose, its better to stop losing, even under unfavorable conditions, than keeping up the fight.

Which is why the Hellenistic kingdoms go down so hard against the Romans. The Romans inflict just one big defeat and the kings cry uncle, because they don't have the political legitimacy to keep fighting. There just isn't a deep consensus for their wars...or their rule.