Shit’s too expensive, and workers are stressing over every bill and paycheck.
Working people built this country, and we deserve more than just scraping by. Let’s elect candidates who will fight to make this economy work for us, not billionaires.
Part 1 of my postdoc work is officially published! 🥳 Hofstenia miamia has emerged as a new model system because of its ability to accomplish whole-body regeneration - but that also means that animals must be able to heal any type of wound. How do they do this? 🧵 1/13
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
There have been recent updates to the @natcomms.nature.com AI use policies! There is a helpful rubric for determining what types of AI use are acceptable that I encourage everyone to check out. www.nature.com/ncomms/edito...
I'm happy to share any feedback from my communities!
Two key points I want to highlight:
1) Disclose ALL use of AI! Transparency builds trust.
2) Don't put anything confidential or unpublished into an "open" LLM. Ever.
This is a great read that captures a lot of my resistance to LLMs. www.theguardian.com/books/ng-int... It takes years to shape a mind into something strong and nimble. I plan for my kids to have such minds.
@springernature.com sold @sciam.bsky.social to LabX Media after the staff voted to form a union with the goal of improving and preserving the publication. We call on LabX to recognize our union. Sign the letter in solidarity! wgaea.st/sciam-letter
Two weeks until #2026SDB kicks off! Super excited to be headed to Las Vegas for another @socdevbio.bsky.social meeting.
DMs are open if you want to set up a time to discuss a potential @natcomms.nature.com submission on #DevBio or #stemcells, editorial careers, or anything else!
Despite the past two @socdevbio.bsky.social meetings being in Atlanta and San Juan, the weather for this year's in Las Vegas is set to be 10+ degrees hotter!
It's really frustrating to have to take time away from reading exciting science to comment on the proposed OMB regulations, but here we are. I strongly recommend anyone who cares about the future of science in the US to do the same. www.regulations.gov/commenton/OM...
Annual killifish continue to surprise us: they make neutrophils before almost every other cell type, even before gastrulation. Neutrophils usually arise from the lateral plate mesoderm (forming in cyan), but in killifish they are already patrolling around the embryo in gold. tinyurl.com/killiphil
Enroute to #EESMechanobiology! proud to represent both @natcellbio.nature.com as senior editor and npj Biological Physics & Mechanics as advisory editor.
Let's discuss your interesting work, science publishing, & more! Find me around &at the #MeetTheEditor lunch On Wed.
Note, I'm only here Tues+Wed
🚨UPDATE: We will launch our action center on this issue tomorrow.
📣JOIN US: Emergency Science Meeting (Virtual) June 2nd at 4pm et. Details to come.
Our Policy Team has read through the entire 400 page hot mess express from Russ Vought...here are the high level details.
A Thread🧵 1/x
BREAKING:
New proposed OMB regulation, applying to all federal grants, requiring grant reviews by senior political appointees and re-emphasizes that "peer review remains advisory and does not replace agency discretion".
#standupforsciencepublic-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-10817.pdf
I heard from several sources yesterday that NIH is planning to release a Request for Information (RFI) that apparently will include this:
Scores and percentiles for NIH grant applications will not be shared with applicants although they will be provided to NIH program officers and staff.
1/3
Headed to the #WeinsteinCVD2026 this week? Our #DevBio and #regeneration editors @ebardot.bsky.social and @keatonschuster.bsky.social will be there! Find them to learn more about publishing with Nature Communications.
Excited to be able to go to the #WeinsteinCVD2026 meeting this week! I attended this meeting during my PhD and loved the community.
DM me if you want to discuss a potential submission or just say hi. I’ll make time Wednesday for 1:1s.
Looking forward to seeing what’s new in heart development🫀
Excited to be able to go to the #WeinsteinCVD2026 meeting this week! I attended this meeting during my PhD and loved the community.
DM me if you want to discuss a potential submission or just say hi. I’ll make time Wednesday for 1:1s.
Looking forward to seeing what’s new in heart development🫀
Screaming to the abyss: #ColossalBio did not resurrect the dire wolf and they're probably just going to make an antelope with methemoglobinemia to give it a bluish color. Their #DeExtinction#DisInformation campaign is just a pyramid scheme because #ExtinctionIsForever 🧪
The SciAm Union is disappointed that @springernature.com dragged our colleagues into a last minute meeting this morning with the notorious union-busting law firm Littler Mendelson (the same one Starbucks and Amazon hire 👀)
Congratulations to Nick Newkirk, an amazing graduate student from the lab, on the latest story that supports a model in which helicase-domain methylation and Dicer phosphorylation act together to regulate Dicer conformation and effector recruitment.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
In August, Jay Bhattacharya said “Training future biomedical scientists” was the 1st priority for his version of NIH.
But talk is cheap. Let’s see how JB’s doing. 🤔
NIH supports trainees mostly via fellowship (F), training (T), and career development (K) awards.
Here are funding curves for each.🧵
This is more broadly generalizable: If you don't do the research yourself, you have no idea if AI is making stuff up. And if you do the research yourself, then AI isn't saving you much labor, if any.
Worse, if Law Schools don't continue to train students to understand legal issues in depth, then they will not have the capacity to even do the "check AI is right" function he suggests will predominate. We're being sold cost cutting for law firms, with an airy wave about what will actually change:
One hard thing about being an editor is that because of confidentiality, we can't respond to The Discourse about our work. It's fun (and justified!) to take shots at the big bad publishing houses. But pile-ons about specific papers from those not involved are tough to watch silently.
This is one reason I am glad NComms publishes the peer review comments and responses. It's helpful to show that in MOST cases, everyone involved during peer review acts with good intentions. We all care about the field; my job is to balance speedy publication against scientific rigor.
57 of my fellow students were arrested, academically disciplined, and barred from campus 2 weeks before finals.
And then the visas of some of those students were quietly revoked.
And then the DEI office was killed.
And then we watched our mentors’ grants evaporate over “woke”.
Shameless plug, but I’m excited to see work in model organisms submitted to @natcomms.nature.com. Model organisms, non-model organisms, stem cell models. There’s room for all of it.
An analysis of published papers on eight widely studied “model” organisms suggests work on them is fading, but not everyone is worried. https://scim.ag/3PaOvIs
Thank you for submitting your Joke "Asphalt-guided Directional Locomotion of Gallus gallus" for consideration in Advances in Jokes. We have now received comments from three reviewers with appropriate senses of humor. Considering their advice I regret to inform you that we cannot publish your Joke.
Once again shouting into the void to say that there is no excuse for using red/green for immunofluorescence images. Obviously 4+ color imaging is difficult to present, but any reason someone gives for using red/green in 2-3 color images is trash.
Yes, readers will understand if you make tdTomato magenta. No, the colors from your antibodies/FPs are not what is actually captured by the (black-and-white!) camera.
I cannot force authors to modify their color choices (yet), but watch me try.
NIH leadership wants to strip worker's rights from the majority of scientists on its campuses.
But, the NIH does not get to say whether we are a union or not. We do, and we are no strangers to having to fight for our union. Time for a short history lesson. 1/n
Disclaimer: all views are my own.
I'd posit that getting input on a manuscript in prep from a real human colleague could serve the same purpose, while also deepening interpersonal connections that have secondary positive effects. The value of this cannot be understated, but it does take more effort.
One question (of many) I have is whether opinions change if researchers are asked if they think AI scientific reviews should be relied on for their colleagues' papers. Often, what researchers want differs depending on whether they are the author or the reviewer.
There will be lots to consider on this topic going forward and this provides a useful framework as well as some baseline impressions. As an editor, it's also good to know that my current opinions are in line with where authors are at the moment.
For example, the consensus that AI scientific reviews are most useful as part of the manuscript preparation process fits with my current feelings. This is a great way to identify blind spots to sort out before peer review, which may save time in review and reduce reviewer burden in the long run.
As an alumni of Mount Sinai, I am horrified by this reporting. Sadly, the culture of prioritizing money and prestige above all else was strong at Sinai. I’m less surprised than I would like to be. These doctors and CEO Kenneth Davis need to go. Now.
A small group of doctors who were compensated lavishly by Jeffrey Epstein gave VIP medical services to the sex offender and the young women around him. Some of them bent or broke the ethical rules of their profession, The New York Times found.
In addition to the medical ethics violations, the leadership have stained otherwise important research programs. According to the files, CEO Davis was actively soliciting Epstein with presentations from research directors as late as 2017!
The fundamental flaw with @holdenthorp.bsky.social’s argument is thinking that organizations and people can only do one thing at a time (even though he is really close to acknowledging it!)
Let’s break it down, bc I’m tired of this. 🧵
(cred: @ianlmorgan.bsky.social)
Headed to @keystonesymposia.bsky.social on Stem Cell Models in Embryology tomorrow! Looking forward to hearing what’s new at the interface of #stemcells and #DevBio and finding promising stories for @natcomms.nature.com. Want to chat? DM me or find me there!
Feel like this is a good lesson to keep generative AI far from your editorial process as a matter of policy. Ars is a great website. If it can happen there it can happen to anyone that allows these tools in
My quote of the day
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.
Charles Darwin
Congrats to the 2026 SDB Award Winners!
Conklin Medal: Lee Niswander
SDB Lifetime Achievement Award: Alexandra Joyner
Hamburger Outstanding Educator Prize: Roberto Mayor
Hay New Investigator Award: Jeffrey Farrell
SDB Trainee SciComm Award: Nicholas Desnoyer
bit.ly/4afnjiC