Evan Bardot (he/him)

Evan Bardot (he/him)

@ebardot.bsky.social

Credentialed degenerate. Emotionally intelligent menace. Fighting enshittification online and off. Senior Editor at Nature Communications handling Developmental Biology.

1.6K followers736 following87 posts

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

Shit’s too expensive, and workers are stressing over every bill and paycheck. Working people built this country, and we deserve more than just scraping by. Let’s elect candidates who will fight to make this economy work for us, not billionaires.

betterinaunion.orgCheck Your Voter Registration StatusHave you moved, changed your name, or you're just not sure of the status of your voter registration? Fill out the form below to check your status.

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

Part 1 of my postdoc work is officially published! 🥳 Hofstenia miamia has emerged as a new model system because of its ability to accomplish whole-body regeneration - but that also means that animals must be able to heal any type of wound. How do they do this? 🧵 1/13 www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.comA flexible repertoire of wound closure strategies precedes whole-body regeneration - Nature CommunicationsAnimals capable of whole-body regeneration can heal virtually any wound. Here they show that Hofstenia miamia accomplishes this feat through variable morphogenetic strategies that depend on which epit...

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

Annual killifish continue to surprise us: they make neutrophils before almost every other cell type, even before gastrulation. Neutrophils usually arise from the lateral plate mesoderm (forming in cyan), but in killifish they are already patrolling around the embryo in gold. tinyurl.com/killiphil

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

Enroute to #EESMechanobiology! proud to represent both @natcellbio.nature.com as senior editor and npj Biological Physics & Mechanics as advisory editor. Let's discuss your interesting work, science publishing, & more! Find me around &at the #MeetTheEditor lunch On Wed. Note, I'm only here Tues+Wed

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

🚨UPDATE: We will launch our action center on this issue tomorrow. 📣JOIN US: Emergency Science Meeting (Virtual) June 2nd at 4pm et. Details to come. Our Policy Team has read through the entire 400 page hot mess express from Russ Vought...here are the high level details. A Thread🧵 1/x

Stand Up for Science!@standupforscience.net

BREAKING: New proposed OMB regulation, applying to all federal grants, requiring grant reviews by senior political appointees and re-emphasizes that "peer review remains advisory and does not replace agency discretion". #standupforscience public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-10817.pdf

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

So... I got more information about this plan. The most important points follow on the next posts. 1/3

Jeremy Berg@jeremymberg.bsky.social

I heard from several sources yesterday that NIH is planning to release a Request for Information (RFI) that apparently will include this: Scores and percentiles for NIH grant applications will not be shared with applicants although they will be provided to NIH program officers and staff. 1/3

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

Headed to the #WeinsteinCVD2026 this week? Our #DevBio and #regeneration editors @ebardot.bsky.social and @keatonschuster.bsky.social will be there! Find them to learn more about publishing with Nature Communications.

Evan Bardot (he/him)@ebardot.bsky.social

Excited to be able to go to the #WeinsteinCVD2026 meeting this week! I attended this meeting during my PhD and loved the community. DM me if you want to discuss a potential submission or just say hi. I’ll make time Wednesday for 1:1s. Looking forward to seeing what’s new in heart development🫀

Excited to be able to go to the #WeinsteinCVD2026 meeting this week! I attended this meeting during my PhD and loved the community. DM me if you want to discuss a potential submission or just say hi. I’ll make time Wednesday for 1:1s. Looking forward to seeing what’s new in heart development🫀

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

Screaming to the abyss: #ColossalBio did not resurrect the dire wolf and they're probably just going to make an antelope with methemoglobinemia to give it a bluish color. Their #DeExtinction #DisInformation campaign is just a pyramid scheme because #ExtinctionIsForever 🧪

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

In August, Jay Bhattacharya said “Training future biomedical scientists” was the 1st priority for his version of NIH. But talk is cheap. Let’s see how JB’s doing. 🤔 NIH supports trainees mostly via fellowship (F), training (T), and career development (K) awards. Here are funding curves for each.🧵

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

This is more broadly generalizable: If you don't do the research yourself, you have no idea if AI is making stuff up. And if you do the research yourself, then AI isn't saving you much labor, if any.

Colin Murray@colinmurray.bsky.social

Worse, if Law Schools don't continue to train students to understand legal issues in depth, then they will not have the capacity to even do the "check AI is right" function he suggests will predominate. We're being sold cost cutting for law firms, with an airy wave about what will actually change:

One hard thing about being an editor is that because of confidentiality, we can't respond to The Discourse about our work. It's fun (and justified!) to take shots at the big bad publishing houses. But pile-ons about specific papers from those not involved are tough to watch silently.

This is one reason I am glad NComms publishes the peer review comments and responses. It's helpful to show that in MOST cases, everyone involved during peer review acts with good intentions. We all care about the field; my job is to balance speedy publication against scientific rigor.

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

57 of my fellow students were arrested, academically disciplined, and barred from campus 2 weeks before finals. And then the visas of some of those students were quietly revoked. And then the DEI office was killed. And then we watched our mentors’ grants evaporate over “woke”.

Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social

Honestly, fuck off.

Shameless plug, but I’m excited to see work in model organisms submitted to @natcomms.nature.com. Model organisms, non-model organisms, stem cell models. There’s room for all of it.

Science Magazine@science.org

An analysis of published papers on eight widely studied “model” organisms suggests work on them is fading, but not everyone is worried. https://scim.ag/3PaOvIs

Thank you for submitting your Joke "Asphalt-guided Directional Locomotion of Gallus gallus" for consideration in Advances in Jokes. We have now received comments from three reviewers with appropriate senses of humor. Considering their advice I regret to inform you that we cannot publish your Joke.

This post is unavailable.

Once again shouting into the void to say that there is no excuse for using red/green for immunofluorescence images. Obviously 4+ color imaging is difficult to present, but any reason someone gives for using red/green in 2-3 color images is trash.

Yes, readers will understand if you make tdTomato magenta. No, the colors from your antibodies/FPs are not what is actually captured by the (black-and-white!) camera. I cannot force authors to modify their color choices (yet), but watch me try.

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

NIH leadership wants to strip worker's rights from the majority of scientists on its campuses. But, the NIH does not get to say whether we are a union or not. We do, and we are no strangers to having to fight for our union. Time for a short history lesson. 1/n Disclaimer: all views are my own.

notus.orgNIH Says It Will No Longer Recognize the Research Fellows’ UnionNIH leadership said the union “should never have been certified,” in an email to the union’s leadership.

I'd posit that getting input on a manuscript in prep from a real human colleague could serve the same purpose, while also deepening interpersonal connections that have secondary positive effects. The value of this cannot be understated, but it does take more effort.

One question (of many) I have is whether opinions change if researchers are asked if they think AI scientific reviews should be relied on for their colleagues' papers. Often, what researchers want differs depending on whether they are the author or the reviewer.

There will be lots to consider on this topic going forward and this provides a useful framework as well as some baseline impressions. As an editor, it's also good to know that my current opinions are in line with where authors are at the moment.

For example, the consensus that AI scientific reviews are most useful as part of the manuscript preparation process fits with my current feelings. This is a great way to identify blind spots to sort out before peer review, which may save time in review and reduce reviewer burden in the long run.

As an alumni of Mount Sinai, I am horrified by this reporting. Sadly, the culture of prioritizing money and prestige above all else was strong at Sinai. I’m less surprised than I would like to be. These doctors and CEO Kenneth Davis need to go. Now.

The New York Times@nytimes.com

A small group of doctors who were compensated lavishly by Jeffrey Epstein gave VIP medical services to the sex offender and the young women around him. Some of them bent or broke the ethical rules of their profession, The New York Times found.

In addition to the medical ethics violations, the leadership have stained otherwise important research programs. According to the files, CEO Davis was actively soliciting Epstein with presentations from research directors as late as 2017!

Evan Bardot (he/him) reposted

My quote of the day Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science. Charles Darwin