elliot

elliot

@elliotcc.bsky.social

🤌 reformed philosopher, noam chompers reply guy, he/him 🤌

304 followers238 following583 posts

You Can See Everything raises questions about the kinds conceptual issues that philosophers love to think about, for example, the distinction between a "strip club" and a "club with strippers"

For most ontological questions I subscribe to not-a-big-deal-ism, the view that sure, stuff is real, but just don’t be weird about it

What if AI makes certain industries more efficient but this is offset by it making virtually every part of human life less efficient as it becomes more and more like searching through your spam folder in case there's anything written by a human in there

Some of the philosophy about alignment sounds to me like if business ethicists' were like, "We all know that corporations wants to maximize the good, but how should they decide whether to be utilitarian or Kantian?"

Uh oh: the world's top experts on ethics got together to solve the problem of AI value alignment and the only thing they could agree on is that it should be really mean to you, personally

Billy's rock struck the bottle first, "preempting" the causal chain involving Suzy's rock. This means that it empted the bottle before it was supposed to.

Brb making pictures of Garfield smoking weed using "super intelligence"

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

Trump: "The White House considers anyone that uses the term, 'Artificial Intelligence,' as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, 'Super Intelligence,' THE ENEMY! President DONALD J. TRUMP"

These sycophantic chatbots are the worst. I don't want you to suck up to me to manipulate me, I want you to suck up to me because you're in love with me

T-1000 Don Draper gesturing at poster of city on fire: "Everyone else's cities are smouldering wastelands; Anthropic's are toasted"

I had a professor in grad school who claimed to have not heard of Beyonce, do you think I should pitch this story to America’s biggest newspaper

elliot reposted

It is sorta a funny thing about philosophy that the questions are inherently fascinating and exciting—there’s a reason people wind up talking about this stuff in dorm rooms—and the best methods we have for investigating them involve being as tedious and pedantic and boring as possible

When a video game reviews badly relative to expectations (7 out of 10 Metacritic) there is an inevitable wave of commentary from gamers saying "I played this and it's not nearly as bad as the critics say, it's like a 7 out of 10"

I feel like an outlier in some AI ethics debates about algorithmic bias because I just have the intuition that it's a violation of your rights for the state to use any demographic information about you to make predictions which determine how the criminal justice system will treat you.

I agree that it's extra bad if such algorithms lead to worse results for oppressed groups. But statistical evidence about demographics is the wrong kind of evidence for these questions in the first place!

The point of studying any philosophical topic is to laboriously demonstrate the futility of thinking about it. Once you've done a PhD on it, it can be very upsetting to learn that others have started thinking about it, having learned nothing from your example.

I think if a business doesn't allow dogs they should have to personally kick out my dog once so that he doesn't think it's me deciding he's not allowed to go in. He can't read the sign, he just thinks I'm being mean.

Based on the difference in reaction to the two documentaries it's clear that Raygun should have invited Nathan Fielder to live with her and her husband for a month

Enough logical positivism, it's time for emotional positivism. Meaning is how the words make me feel! Heidegger is nonsense because the words make me feel confused and angry!

None of it matters the Y axis is “Sounds boring -> Sounds cool”

SMBC Comics@smbccomics.bsky.social

Anyone who doesn't find this funny is in the lower right. COMIC ◆ www.smbc-comics.com/comic/philos... PATREON ◆ www.patreon.com/ZachWeinersm... STORE ◆ smbc-store.myshopify.com

Playing any video game is cheating because it violates the implicit pact in every union to confront our intolerable shared reality without blinking

IGN@ign.com

A bunch of angry spouses on social media believe that Grand Theft Auto 6's in-depth relationship mechanic is equivalent to cheating on your real life partner and worth breaking up over. https://bit.ly/4qLlUbp

This happened to me when Molson introduced caffeine beer and I drank a six pack to impress the boys

NBC News@nbcnews.com

A Chinese humanoid robot outran Usain Bolt’s 100-meter sprint world record on the opening day of the World Humanoid Robot Games in Beijing, posting a time of 9.39 seconds — 0.19 faster than Bolt’s pace in 2009.

Yes, I think it is bad to train machines to churn out plausible-sounding arguments for any claim whatsoever with no regard for its plausibility. And that is why I'm in favour of shutting down the philosophy department.

Baby boomers: naive, cringe, skinny pants Gen X: disaffected, depressing, wide leg pants Millennials: naive, cringe, skinny pants Gen Z: disaffected, depressing, wide leg pants

It's true that complaining about counting citations is pure cope, except for the special case of 0 actually being the ideal number of citations

elliot@elliotcc.bsky.social

If no one cites your article it actually means that no one could find anything wrong with it and you did a perfect job :)

elliot reposted

I feel like an issue that would connect well with voters would be doing anything at all to slow the current progression toward "absolutely everything now is a scam"

This AI generated philosophy article is exposing some weaknesses in what we all previously agreed was a perfect system that works great for everyone, academic publishing

This is partly inspired by the Daily Nous thing about AI authorship but also by trying to grapple with this very good essay by David Hollingshead in Defector:

defector.comHumanists Have Done Nothing Wrong | DefectorFor many years, I’ve held a pet theory that cultural consumers can be grouped into two broad categories: Primary Source People and Secondary Source People. The former are the book lovers, cinephiles, ...
elliot@elliotcc.bsky.social

I don't quite know how to put it but I think there is a distinction within analytic philosophy between work that simply states a new idea and its motivations, deal with the obvious objections, etc. and work that tries to get you to deeply understand a problem and appreciate its connections...

I don't quite know how to put it but I think there is a distinction within analytic philosophy between work that simply states a new idea and its motivations, deal with the obvious objections, etc. and work that tries to get you to deeply understand a problem and appreciate its connections...

...to other issues, which often aren't obvious. The second kind might defend a particular view, but its value lies less in its persuasiveness than in its illumination of the territory. The first kind of work is more 'scientistic,' in the sense that it looks more science on its face. There's good...

...good work of both kinds, but I think every work of philosophy that I've been deeply inspired by falls in the second category. When people describe the goal of philosophy as pursuing the truth, I think that makes (even analytic) philosophy sound more like science than it really is.

Hello I am a car company, we sell two products: cars we guarantee will work for a while (one billion dollars) and fun gambles that are YOUR PROBLEM (one million dollars). By the way they both look like farts made of plastic

Woke 3 makes woke 2 look like woke 1

VeX@vexdigest.bsky.social

What's the optimal order to experience Woke. Someone was telling me I should do Woke 4 and 5 first, then go back to Woke 1.

Fellas, is it gay to bring a pen to class?

Amanda@ermandyy.bsky.social

Unimportant, but: Does TAH think all highlighters are referred to as yellow highlighters regardless of color? Or do these dorks he's envisioning have six different shades of yellow in their highlighter collection?

elliot reposted

Replying to @tedmccormick.bsky.social

It’s quite wild that the overwhelming reason good scholars leave academia is that, despite the huge amount of teaching being done, there are virtually no jobs in it that will allow them to ply their trade post-PhD, but the only reason media outlets care about is The Wrong Hires at boutique colleges

If you want to leave academia to find a career where you have more freedom of expression, you have virtually no choice but to be a podcaster

This post is unavailable.

Help I got the black lung working down on the tenure track, I’m going blind and my hands are worn down to the bone but it’s the only work I know how to do

Rewatched Midsommar and was struck by the intertextual reference when the girl says they are going to watch Austin Powers; taken together, one notices the theme of the difficulties inherent in being immersed in an unfamiliar culture