Jack Fitzgerald reposted
@unjournal.bsky.social and @i4replication.bsky.social are joining forces to talk about the future of open science practices. Join our webinar on November 13! shorturl.at/u55q4
Jack Fitzgerald
@jackfitzgerald.bsky.social
Postdoctoral Scholar at Stanford University. Working on applied econometrics, replication, and metascience. https://jack-fitzgerald.github.io. Likes/reposts aren’t endorsements, views are my own.
1.5K followers269 following195 posts
Jack Fitzgerald reposted
@unjournal.bsky.social and @i4replication.bsky.social are joining forces to talk about the future of open science practices. Join our webinar on November 13! shorturl.at/u55q4
The article we commented on in PNAS (along w/ many others), which claimed that cognitive scores could be used to detect professional soccer players with 97% accuracy, has now been retracted. Comment: doi.org/10.1073/pnas... Retraction notice: doi.org/10.1073/pnas...
Two more retractions and a discussion of what we learned. 🧵 #CRAVEFiles
Jack Fitzgerald reposted
My contribution stopped after the first paper, but I can confirm I saw a lot of crazy stuff on at least that first paper. Read our comment at @pnas.org! doi.org/10.1073/pnas...
Our chair and a few replicators investigated a paper about elite footballers. And missed the bigger story. An independent researcher showed us what we had failed to see. This is I4R’s CRAVE–football investigation. It starts with a PNAS paper. #CRAVEFiles
Jack Fitzgerald reposted
Over the past two years, I4R partnered with Psychological Science (@psychscience.bsky.social) on a large reproducibility project. 67 independent teams reproduced 64 articles published in 2024–2025, about 44% of eligible papers. Paper: www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10... Here's what we learned 🧵
Jack Fitzgerald reposted
📣 Does involving journal editors in replication material requests impact the availability of such materials? @jackfitzgerald.bsky.social and coauthors invite your predictions! 🕐Time: 15 min 🗓️ Closes: Sept 15 📚 Field: Economics socialscienceprediction.org/predict/r/30...
An update on our log-like specifications paper! We’ve updated our recommendations and added new commands in Stata and R for one of our recommended alternatives. 1/ osf.io/preprints/me...
New preprint! We reanalyze 46 papers that use log-like specifications (ln(Z+1), inverse hyperbolic sine etc). We find widespread non-robustness, and we show through theory + simulation how these models drive spurious significance. 1/ doi.org/10.31222/osf...
An update on our log-like specifications paper! We’ve updated our recommendations and added new commands in Stata and R for one of our recommended alternatives. 1/ osf.io/preprints/me...
New preprint! We reanalyze 46 papers that use log-like specifications (ln(Z+1), inverse hyperbolic sine etc). We find widespread non-robustness, and we show through theory + simulation how these models drive spurious significance. 1/ doi.org/10.31222/osf...
We provide the lzqreg command in Stata (available on SSC) and the lzrq package/function in R (available on CRAN). 8/ doi.org/10.32614/CRA...
An update on our log-like specifications paper! We’ve updated our recommendations and added new commands in Stata and R for one of our recommended alternatives. 1/ osf.io/preprints/me...
New preprint! We reanalyze 46 papers that use log-like specifications (ln(Z+1), inverse hyperbolic sine etc). We find widespread non-robustness, and we show through theory + simulation how these models drive spurious significance. 1/ doi.org/10.31222/osf...
Generally, one can run quantile regression after transforming Y with the ‘calibrated extensive margin’ transformation (Chen & @jondr44.bsky.social 2024), setting positive values to ln(Y) and setting non-positive values to constant -Ψ. 5/ doi.org/10.1093/qje/...
An update on our log-like specifications paper! We’ve updated our recommendations and added new commands in Stata and R for one of our recommended alternatives. 1/ osf.io/preprints/me...
New preprint! We reanalyze 46 papers that use log-like specifications (ln(Z+1), inverse hyperbolic sine etc). We find widespread non-robustness, and we show through theory + simulation how these models drive spurious significance. 1/ doi.org/10.31222/osf...
An update on our log-like specifications paper! We’ve updated our recommendations and added new commands in Stata and R for one of our recommended alternatives. 1/ osf.io/preprints/me...
New preprint! We reanalyze 46 papers that use log-like specifications (ln(Z+1), inverse hyperbolic sine etc). We find widespread non-robustness, and we show through theory + simulation how these models drive spurious significance. 1/ doi.org/10.31222/osf...
Most notably, we highlight a recent idea from Liu & Kaplan (2025) to use quantile regression to estimate intensive-margin logarithmic relationships, which is possible even with 0s/negatives in the data. 2/ drive.google.com/file/d/1F3dn...
Happy to have the CBS Replication Games (and my replication research more broadly) featured on the ODISSEI Podcast! Tune in if you're interested in hearing @drtomemery.bsky.social and I nerd out over replication!
How can games change research culture? 🧩 On this month's ODISSEI podcast, @drtomemery.bsky.social talks with Jack Fitzgerald about replication, and why it needs to be more embedded in research. That's why the Replication Games were developed, Jack explains. 🎧 Tune in to learn more: edu.nl/eqhuc
Jack Fitzgerald reposted
How can games change research culture? 🧩 On this month's ODISSEI podcast, @drtomemery.bsky.social talks with Jack Fitzgerald about replication, and why it needs to be more embedded in research. That's why the Replication Games were developed, Jack explains. 🎧 Tune in to learn more: edu.nl/eqhuc
Our paper on the effect of large language models on replicators' success in conducting reproducibility + robustness checks is now published at PNAS. Before advocating that we let AI completely take over the replication process, please read our paper! doi.org/10.1073/pnas...
9/ The paper is "AI-Assisted Teams Outperform AI-Led Teams but Not Human-Only Teams in Assessing Research Reproducibility in Quantitative Social Science." Published in PNAS. DOI: doi.org/10.1073/pnas... Preprint: ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/i4rdps...
Fresh preprint! Using Dutch administrative data, I show that businesses who respond to business surveys are typically unrepresentative, and that this unrepresentativeness is driven by which businesses are contacted for those surveys. 1/ doi.org/10.31235/osf...
Fresh preprint! Using Dutch administrative data, I show that businesses who respond to business surveys are typically unrepresentative, and that this unrepresentativeness is driven by which businesses are contacted for those surveys. 1/ doi.org/10.31235/osf...
Fresh preprint! Using Dutch administrative data, I show that businesses who respond to business surveys are typically unrepresentative, and that this unrepresentativeness is driven by which businesses are contacted for those surveys. 1/ doi.org/10.31235/osf...
Fresh preprint! Using Dutch administrative data, I show that businesses who respond to business surveys are typically unrepresentative, and that this unrepresentativeness is driven by which businesses are contacted for those surveys. 1/ doi.org/10.31235/osf...
Fresh preprint! Using Dutch administrative data, I show that businesses who respond to business surveys are typically unrepresentative, and that this unrepresentativeness is driven by which businesses are contacted for those surveys. 1/ doi.org/10.31235/osf...
Fresh preprint! Using Dutch administrative data, I show that businesses who respond to business surveys are typically unrepresentative, and that this unrepresentativeness is driven by which businesses are contacted for those surveys. 1/ doi.org/10.31235/osf...
Jack Fitzgerald reposted
My article "Three-Sided Testing to Establish Practical Significance" with @jackfitzgerald.bsky.social is now published in AMPPS! journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... Three-sided testing is an improved version of TOST that lets you test for equivalence, superiority and inferiority simultaneously.
Happy to see my paper with @isager.bsky.social on three-sided testing published at Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science! If you're interested in practical significance testing, give it a read! doi.org/10.1177/2515...
New paper for holiday reading! @isager.bsky.social and I provide an introduction to three-sided testing, a framework for testing estimates' practical significance. We offer a tutorial, Shiny app, + commands/code in #Rstats, #Jamovi, + #Stata. 1/9 osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/8y925 #EconSky #PsychSky
Given my stance on log-like specifications, I was surprised to learn that there's a 'news' article on my paper in Nature Human Behaviour, claiming that it actually advocates for the use of IHS specifications. This is categorically untrue. 1/ t.co/ZGjAmHZhLv
New preprint! We reanalyze 46 papers that use log-like specifications (ln(Z+1), inverse hyperbolic sine etc). We find widespread non-robustness, and we show through theory + simulation how these models drive spurious significance. 1/ doi.org/10.31222/osf...
My NHB paper is literally about an article where problems with IHS transformations revealed data irregularities that (partly) resulted in that article's retraction. That NHB paper doesn't take any stance on IHS specifications, let alone a *pro* stance. 2/ doi.org/10.1038/s415...