Pinned
Josh
Josh
@joshsaintjacque.com
Seattle-area Staff Software Engineer working mostly on web applications. I work mostly in Ruby on Rails and React. Interested in AI and LLM discussions. I sometimes write on joshsaintjacque.com.
615 followers2K following484 posts
Very pragmatic take on AI in engineering from Amazon. www.aboutamazon.com/news/company...
Josh reposted
Josh reposted
It is strange how much LLMs turned out to be able to solve such a wide range of hard problems that would not, instinctively, seem to be problems that a model of human language would be able to solve This is from a Stanford project that let Astra drive a robot in a kitchen tml.stanford.edu/homebody/
This deserves more attention than it got. Realtime ad/clutter blocking that could easily sidestep the Manifest V3 issue that broke ad blockers in Chrome.
Josh reposted
mostly agree with this but I think it's more precise to say "we will review high-level artifacts but the vast majority of what is produced will not be that" newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-... x.com/MarcJBrooker...
rather than spec, code, and lockfile, imagine there are 50 layers to this hierarchy. can you delete layer 50 and reconstruct it based on everything from 1-49? etc. naturally if you delete the whole thing you have nothing. if you delete 2-50 you're going to end up with something quite different. etc
“Most-likely-text generators” that are discovering new math and can one shot web applications.
LLMs aren't made of neurology except in the most handwavey sense. They're made of narrative. That's why I started calling them text elementals: they're not human, they're most-likely-text generators we bent into living stories in a prose format centering the characters User and Assistant
I have somewhat thought here. I wonder if this is something that your orchestrating agent would invoke rather than you directly. 
i feel like it’s a mistake to overlook this model, although i’m having trouble figuring out where it fits in my workflow wild new architecture, totally different approach my hunch is the main agent can use it as a tool. So you could use this with Luna to get Astra perf, idk
Josh reposted
Jev: Fable-level model that doesn’t charge for output tokens because they’re too cheap to meter it’s not general though, it only makes decisions, doesn’t generate text, but input tokens are measured by the billion ($42/btok) typesafe.ai/blog/introdu...
$0.042/million tokens in and zero cost output tokens is insane. The speed is wild too. Can’t wait to try this out.
Josh reposted
Josh reposted
In 2027, mysterious hacks attributed to open source weights and definitely not connected to the companies that accidentally hacked a bunch of companies in 2026, which was okay
lol two months ago OpenAI was signing a letter about how important open weights models were and now their house propagandist is saying “we will ban open weights and you will thank us for it”. You can’t hate this company enough
"If we execute these measures well, I believe they would slow China’s progress enough to widen America’s lead significantly over the next 3–5 years — the window when AI becomes geopolitically most important." So 3-5 years is the real horizon for AGI/ASI.
Looks like Anthropic, OpenAI, and xAI have all agreed to "pace" frontier models. The steps proposed by Amodei look like a nuclear arms limitations treaty, complete with third party inspectors.
Looks like Anthropic, OpenAI, and xAI have all agreed to "pace" frontier models. The steps proposed by Amodei look like a nuclear arms limitations treaty, complete with third party inspectors.
So, Moonshot was pretending to serve Kimi but really serving Claude? Wild stuff here.
Mostly good takes although I disagree with the idea that the death of middle management means the death of career development. One of the biggest mistakes our industry made was making management the default upward path for software engineers. 
A couple of trends I'm seeing across the industry. Which ones are you observing that I missed?
Josh reposted
Independent of policy debates about existential risk, it is worth noting that even if AI development stopped today with the models we have right now, we would still have at least a decade of roiling change throughout much of work, education, and social life as harnesses improve & AI diffuses further
Anthropic's take on what AI is going to do to jobs and the economy over the next few years. Apart from the (mostly) reasonable projections, there's some good visualizations of how roles are being transformed.