James S. Pumpkins
James S. Pumpkins
@jspumpkins.bsky.social
Stridently pro-blocking, anti-French fry. Microbiologist/biochemist.
542 followers534 following3.2K posts
I have a lot of questions about this. He was initially diagnosed with superficial clots, which don't normally cause emboli... but was told not to sleep, which is primarily a precaution for unstable/new DVT? So did they know he had a DVT and let him play anyway? This makes no sense to me.
Eagles QB Jalen Hurts, who is out for the season after several blood clots were revealed in his lungs. Before the London game, Hurts was in the hospital until 4 am and did not sleep because sleep was a risk. He played the game without having slept. Crazy.
When I was in grad school I was working late one night when I heard someone yell from the hallway. I went to check & another grad student had picked up a bat that landed in the hallway and it bit him. I had to drag him to the clinic the next day for vaxxes. He was here on a Fulbright scholarship.
Dude might actually end up breaking crazification before this is over.
New Fox poll's internals are brutal for Trump: *approval on inflation 22-77 *approval w/ independents 21-78 *approval w/ Latinos 21-79 *underwater w/ noncollege whites and non-MAGA Rs (!) On the pod we bring you the numbers and discuss whether the polls are correct: newrepublic.com/article/2167...
James S. Pumpkins reposted
James S. Pumpkins reposted
Crazy idea: Democrats should defend immigration and immigrants, run on the idea that immigrants make America great, and stop Homer Simpsoning themselves into the shrubbery every time Republicans try to demagogue it.
New Marist poll of Texas finds 61% say undocumented immigrants should stay in US if meet certain requirements. Only 35% say they should leave. A majority of noncollege white men (Trump base) says stay. Supports my case (see piece/thread below) that Trump opened way for new pro-immigrant consensus
The thing that you have to remember about this dude is that internal consistency doesn't exist. His opinion of someone is entirely related to how useful they've been to him lately and Guilfoyle made him look bad, so he's going to tack to whatever position makes her look bad and him good.
TRUMP TODAY: "She wasn't a member of my family. She I guess dated my son a long time ago" TRUMP NOT EVEN 2 YEARS AGO: "Kimberly has been a close friend and ally"
James S. Pumpkins reposted
James S. Pumpkins reposted
Just to underline the monstrousness of this: The risk of Hepatits B developing into a chronic infection, the most dangerous and life-altering type, is inversely proportional to age. In an adult, it's around 5-10%. In infants, it's 90%. In children 1-5, 50%.
“The children who are randomly selected not to receive the birth dose of the vaccine, those who “lost the lottery”, face in their earliest days the risk of contracting hepatitis B, which can cause irreversible lifelong damage.” No words. I am speechless. This violates all ethical boundaries.
James S. Pumpkins reposted
James S. Pumpkins reposted
Whoever wins the governorships in the battleground states will certify the 2028 presidential election. There are election deniers running, in Wisconsin and elsewhere. We've got to beat them. My new NYT op-ed:
I realize that this is dangerously close to a West Wing bit but 31% of the population approve of the job he's doing and 44% would still vote for him. 13% don't like the job he's doing and would STILL VOTE FOR HIM ANYWAY. WHAT IS THEIR DAMAGE?
"If you we're to vote in the 2024 election, knowing what you know today, who would you vote for?" 🔵 Harris: 50% 🔴 Trump: 44% Cygnal / Oct 2, 2026
This was about Texas but it applies broadly. Enjoy their suffering, even if it's ephemeral, you deserve it. Lighten up and feast on the temporary sorrow.
Look, I'm going to enjoy the vibes coming off of this polling because 1) it makes Republicans miserable and their misery sustains me and 2) it costs me nothing if the polling is wrong because we'll lose a race everyone expected us to lose anyway.
While I'm on the same side of this sentiment, people don't realize how far right the combination of population loss and gerrymandering have transformed this state. We are closer to Montana and South Dakota than most people seem to appreciate.
ohio we will be unmerciful in our mockery if you elect this guy
This is why they went so hard on indirect costs/overhead in the first round of this. That money goes directly to universities to pay for core facilities and upkeep/maintenance costs.
OMB has not repeatedly proposed a 55%+ cut to NSF because of 'woke' research—even if you eliminated all of the grants flagged in the Cruz report, you wouldn't scratch 10% of the budget. It is because NSF heavily funds universities.
Do not forget that Linda McMahon covered up the systematic abuse of young boys by two of her employees and personally hired them back after they were fired, after which they continued their systematic abuse.
Every student in Colorado & across the country deserves to feel safe, supported & protected at school, no matter what. The Dept of Eds decision to roll back Title IX protections for LGBTQ students is a devastating step backward. I'll keep fighting to ensure EVERY student is protected under the law.
Ooh, I know this one -- Because at some point a decision was made to shift the cost (in both resources and time) of training onto the employees themselves and the state. Many groups participated in this, including universities and the state itself.
If our mission is just to train students to become good workers, then Torenberg is right--why not leave that to the industries themselves, who actually know what they're looking for?
Ooh, I know this one -- Because at some point a decision was made to shift the cost (in both resources and time) of training onto the employees themselves and the state. Many groups participated in this, including universities and the state itself.
If our mission is just to train students to become good workers, then Torenberg is right--why not leave that to the industries themselves, who actually know what they're looking for?