My lab at USC is recruiting!
1) research coordinator: perfect for a recent graduate looking for research experience before applying to PhD programs: usccareers.usc.edu REQ20167829
2) PhD students: see FAQs on lab website dornsife.usc.edu/hklab/faq/
When and how do newborns see a face?
@nmwilkinson.eurosky.social and colleagues identify a serious problem in how a foundational newborn study has been interpreted.
But the Bluesky victory lap is leaving out a rather important detail: neonates track FACE drawings!
bsky.app/profile/nmwi...
New paper! Accepted at Perspectives on Psychological Science.
A textbook finding in infant psychology is that newborns - within ~1 hour of birth - visually track a simplified 'three blob' facelike stimulus further than its inverted control (see picture). This suggested inborn knowledge of faces!
also shout-out to @levelsof.bsky.social who engaged with what the presence (or absence) of a set of results in neonates means (or doesn't mean) for nativist accounts of development.
bsky.app/profile/leve...
in sum, if the criticism is that researchers selectively transmitted findings to support a preferred theory, selectively transmitting findings to celebrate its demise seems an unfortunate response.
Correct the three-blob story. Explain the face preference. Both are important parts of the paper.
When and how do newborns see a face?
@nmwilkinson.eurosky.social and colleagues identify a serious problem in how a foundational newborn study has been interpreted.
But the Bluesky victory lap is leaving out a rather important detail: neonates track FACE drawings!
bsky.app/profile/nmwi...
New paper! Accepted at Perspectives on Psychological Science.
A textbook finding in infant psychology is that newborns - within ~1 hour of birth - visually track a simplified 'three blob' facelike stimulus further than its inverted control (see picture). This suggested inborn knowledge of faces!
And @deontbenton.bsky.social, this in no way challenges domain specificity.. babies still prefer and track faces! They just aren’t satisfied with three blobs. How does a preference that requires MORE than a face-like configuration become evidence against domain specificity? bsky.app/profile/deon...
Are the original Johnson et al. 1991 findings evidence of a face-template or something more general, and is this bias to orient towards stimuli like them reflective of an domain-specific mechanism?
This excellent paper challenges the face-template interpretation as well as the domain-specific one.
We need more meta-analytic and big science work on newborns like this.
Research w/ newborns is HARD
1. Measurements are noisy and often ambiguous
2. Number of drop outs is high
3. Sample sizes are usually <20
This puts the newborn work highly at risk of spurious results and poor replicability
When and how do newborns see a face?
@nmwilkinson.eurosky.social and colleagues identify a serious problem in how a foundational newborn study has been interpreted.
But the Bluesky victory lap is leaving out a rather important detail: neonates track FACE drawings!
bsky.app/profile/nmwi...
New paper! Accepted at Perspectives on Psychological Science.
A textbook finding in infant psychology is that newborns - within ~1 hour of birth - visually track a simplified 'three blob' facelike stimulus further than its inverted control (see picture). This suggested inborn knowledge of faces!
Yet a theory (CONSPEC) treated that simplification as sufficient and generations of dev psyc students learned it was true.
@nmwilkinson.eurosky.social is right to challenge that interpretation. But, we need to preserve the positive findings, too! not repeat the same mistakes
So... @numcog.bsky.social, this paper STRENGTHENS, not weakens, arguments for nativism:
Within an hour of birth, newborns track schematic faces but not scrambled face parts. The template fails to capture that pattern and the explanatory problem just got more interesting!
bsky.app/profile/numc...
I grew up as a Developmental Psychologist in a era of almost unbridled Nativism. To see so many of its foundations crumble and being exposed for lack of rigour is fascinating to witness
When and how do newborns see a face?
@nmwilkinson.eurosky.social and colleagues identify a serious problem in how a foundational newborn study has been interpreted.
But the Bluesky victory lap is leaving out a rather important detail: neonates track FACE drawings!
bsky.app/profile/nmwi...
New paper! Accepted at Perspectives on Psychological Science.
A textbook finding in infant psychology is that newborns - within ~1 hour of birth - visually track a simplified 'three blob' facelike stimulus further than its inverted control (see picture). This suggested inborn knowledge of faces!
Goren et al. (1975) found that newborns tested within an hour of birth preferentially tracked schematic faces over scrambled controls. Johnson et al. (1991) replicated that preference.
That finding survives the review & meta-analysis & deserves at least as much attention as the debunking.
What Johnson et al. did NOT establish was preferential tracking of three blobs arranged like a face (“config”) over the inverse config or scrambled face parts.
The FACE preference survived! But, the proposed three-blob simplification did not establish the preference subsequently attributed to it.
Across studies, neonates prevented from seeing a face in the first hours of birth track faces more than scrambled face parts. But when you replace the eyes, nose, and mouth with three squares, this effect goes away. Sum: babies prefer faces! But…subcortical face “template”… not so much
Great job! 👏
New paper! Accepted at Perspectives on Psychological Science.
A textbook finding in infant psychology is that newborns - within ~1 hour of birth - visually track a simplified 'three blob' facelike stimulus further than its inverted control (see picture). This suggested inborn knowledge of faces!
What's driving today's research integrity challenges? Respondents to SSP's latest Pulse Check ranked publish-or-perish incentive structures as the most impactful root cause, followed closely by generative AI outpacing policy and detection. Explore the full findings >>
Vassar is hiring a clinical psychologist!! This is a terrific position for someone seeking a true balance of research & teaching responsibilities on a gorgeous campus 75 miles north of NYC. Please repost!
Vassar's Dept of Psychological Science is hiring an Assistant Prof (tenure-track) specializing in clinical psych or psychopathology. Come join me in the beautiful Hudson Valley! 🍁🍃🍎
vassar.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/Vassar...
Please repost!! 🔁
UCSD Psychology is hiring!! We’re seeking a new assistant professor colleague who studies high-level human cognition, broadly construed. Please share and/or apply! apol-recruit.ucsd.edu/JPF04646
Thrilled to announce that my department, UCI cognitive sciences, is hiring a tenure-track assistant professor in the area of computational social cognition.
Further information including the application can be found at: recruit.ap.uci.edu/JPF10411
Awake infant fMRI offers a rare window into early brain and cognitive development. In a new paper out now in Infancy, we leverage data from hundreds of infant scans from the Saxe and Turk-Browne Labs to reveal what factors drive scanning success — and how future studies can maximize data retention!
New book! I have written a book, called Syntax: A cognitive approach, published by MIT Press.
This is open access; MIT Press will post a link soon, but until then, the book is available on my website:
tedlab.mit.edu/tedlab_websi...
I'm recruiting PhD students to join my new lab in Fall 2026! The Shared Minds Lab at @usc.edu will combine deep learning and ecological human neuroscience to better understand how we communicate our thoughts from one brain to another.
In the latest #UndertheCortex episode, cognitive scientists @rebeccasaxe.bsky.social of @mit.edu and @kosakowski.bsky.social of @harvard.edu discuss their groundbreaking findings about the development of the brain’s face-processing network.
We were blown away by the public response to our findings that the infant brain can store memories. Many people wrote to share with us their first memories. To help us capture these reports, we created a short, anonymous survey. We hope you might also consider taking it. Please share with others! 🧠🧪
Why do we not remember being a baby? One idea is that the hippocampus, which is essential for episodic memory in adults, is too immature to form individual memories in infancy. We tested this using awake infant fMRI, new in @science.org#ScienceResearchwww.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
The question we ask: when do face responses arise in human infant cortex?
Neuroscientists and developmental psychologists (my two disciplines) have different intuitions.
Very excited to share this new paper, out this week.
An attempt to express an idea I have been working on for more than a decade.
Responses, questions, critiques, suggestions encouraged!
Very excited to share this new paper, out this week.
An attempt to express an idea I have been working on for more than a decade.
Responses, questions, critiques, suggestions encouraged!
In our recent review, @rebeccasaxe.bsky.social & I bring together fMRI & fNIRS findings from the last decade to argue that babies not only perceive faces but they also attribute meaning to those faces. It’s a short read and we’d love to hear your thoughts. (4/5) doi.org/10.1177/0963...
When you see this image, does it make you wonder what that baby is thinking. Do you think the baby is merely perceiving a set of shapes or do you think that the baby is also inferring meaning from the face they are looking at? (1/5)
In our recent review, @rebeccasaxe.bsky.social & I bring together fMRI & fNIRS findings from the last decade to argue that babies not only perceive faces but they also attribute meaning to those faces. It’s a short read and we’d love to hear your thoughts. (4/5) doi.org/10.1177/0963...
When you see this image, does it make you wonder what that baby is thinking. Do you think the baby is merely perceiving a set of shapes or do you think that the baby is also inferring meaning from the face they are looking at? (1/5)
There many reasons the Madonna and Child image holds diverse audiences captive. It evokes not just the love a parent has a child but also the love a child has for a parent. The art depicts a relationship between 2 people, going beyond merely perceiving a collection of shapes. (2/5)
Do babies really infer meaning from the people around them? Are their brains able to process more than the onslaught of sights & sounds hitting their sensory organs? These Qs have fascinated philosophers & scientists for millennia. How do babies experience their environments? (3/5)
This month’s “Liftoff” features @jocelynbreton.bsky.social discussing the importance of patience when opening a lab. And @vivianpaulun.bsky.social shares how she'll use a traditional German custom in her lab to foster a supportive and uplifting culture.
#neuroskyencebit.ly/4hFNosx
In rough periwinkle snails, embryos form and mature inside the brood pouch at different rates. When it’s time to hatch, youngsters may have to crawl out of mom’s body and into the world on their own.
The official website for the #DSPAN F99/K00 transition award is down, together with the official #NINDSDiversity social media account and webpage.
This is beyond terrifying.
neuroscienceblueprint.nih.gov/archived/tra...
So excited to receive the Troland Award!! Huge congrats to the other winner—Nick Turk-Browne! And TY, as always, to my mentors&nominators, to my amazing labbies past&present, and to all the wonderful and supportive colleagues in our broader scientific community. <3 www.nasonline.org/award/trolan...
✨ Do you know anyone who is making a real impact in area of increasing environmental sustainability in neuroimaging research? 🌎 🍃
🏆 Nominate them for an OHBM Sustainability Award today!
The recipient will receive $2500 USD! See below for award terms 👇
www.humanbrainmapping.org/i4a/pages/in...
🎉 Award Nominations Are Open! 🏆
Nominate outstanding individuals for the 2025 Annual Meeting in Brisbane!
🗓️ Open: Dec 19, 2024 – Feb 4, 2025
🌟 Celebrate excellence in your field.
🔗 Link in comments!
#AwardNominations#OHBM2025
😎 SPAN2025 Keynotes, invited symposia speakers, and sponsored symposia just dropped! Take a look at who will be at SPAN2025 and then submit your abstract so you can be there too!
More invited speakers will be announced soon. Visit our website for all the details: philandneuro.com
"The Illusion-Illusion: Vision Language Models See
Illusions Where There are None"
osf.io/preprints/ps...
(this is a more systematic examination of the thing I was looking at a few days ago)
New paper from our lab, by Mark Saddler, using machine learning to test the role of temporal coding in hearing. Here is a quick summary. (1/n)
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Three ManyBabies projects - big collaborative replications of infancy phenomena - wrapped up this year. The first paper came out this fall. I thought I'd take this chance to comment on what I make of the non-replication result. 🧵
bsky.app/profile/laur...
The Manybabies4 paper is out! Infants' Social Evaluation of Helpers and Hinderers: A Large-Scale, Multi-Lab, Coordinated Replication Study onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1... 1000 babies tested in 37 labs; "Overall, 49.34% of infants preferred Helpers over Hinderers in the social condition"
We are now up to 78 accounts on our Black In Neuro starter pack! Be sure to check back and make sure you have everyone added 🤗
Please let us know if we missed you!
#BlackInSTEM#Neuroskyence#Psychology#AcademicSky 🧪
go.bsky.app/F8PpdPe
The Manybabies4 paper is out! Infants' Social Evaluation of Helpers and Hinderers: A Large-Scale, Multi-Lab, Coordinated Replication Study onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1... 1000 babies tested in 37 labs; "Overall, 49.34% of infants preferred Helpers over Hinderers in the social condition"
I feel so honored by the publication of this special issue of Neuropsychologia. Thanks so much to my friends and colleagues who put this together. And thanks to all the contributors. There are so many wonderful articles. I can't tell you how delighted I am. 🧪🧠 www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
"results highlight the importance of going beyond the nuclear family towards the impact of the wider family network when examining children's socio-emotional development" onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....