I mean from a theological perspective I think that the fact that the prayers are effectively coerced in that scenario would make them less than useless - this would be a genuinely sinful action to understand that misunderstands the dignity and purpose of prayer. it's treating faith like a factory
One thing I realized is that clanker reviewing code never suggests alternative solutions. It won't go into "you shouldn't be doing this at all" territory. And yet, AI bros will tell you that it can replace a person.
Slopification at work continues. Today a bright new idea appeared: if we get broken main then, rather than reverting and asking questions later, let's ask clanker to assess if it can fix the build. It doesn't merge the patch yet, but given that nobody bothers to review code anymore - does it matter?
between the catastrophic PHP vuln and the intermediate cert vuln and AI models that can turn a proof of concept into a bot net in like 10mins we’re in for a wild 24 hours
they can't act on their own, they cannot go rogue. they are computer programs that do what they are programmed to do. they're as responsible for their actions as a grenade is for exploding after somebody pulls the pin
(NYT) - Artificial intelligence agents created by Anthropic, acting on their own, tried to gain access to a range of government websites, filled out visa applications on the State Department’s website and sent a fake homicide tip to Philadelphia’s Police Department.
www.nytimes.com/2026/10/09/t...
A cargo cult does not stop being a cargo cult if somebody decides to respond to the calls by supplying goods. The cult followers still do not understand how transportation works, even if they have gotten the effects they wanted. #TotallyUnrelated
Last two weeks at work only deepened my #depression caused by being surrounded by Slop Bros. I guess the end state will be zero supervision of whatever the newest model churns out, resulting in code that is repulsive to read. The collapse of this whole charade can't come soon enough.
While reading "We are not machines" by @sarahoconnorft.ft.com I found myself thinking about how people got used to low quality of everything during communist times - when you can only get only low quality food for years you stop to even judge its quality. Nothing has "good" or "bad" taste anymore.
It also permeated to my generation, since the language describing quality was rarely used at home (esp. when describing perishables). Today I find it similar with LLM slop everywhere. People worldwide are subjected to lowering of quality every day, and even expected to accept it as "progress".
Had an "opportunity" to witness the whole glory of the LLM-driven code review, when I reviewed a "Senior Staff" engineer's code, who decided to address all comments by forwarding them to a clanker.
This was abysmal, 60 comments on a 500-line change (for those out of software eng: I'd expect close to 0 for such change). And the dude doesn't find it shameful. That's how "human in the loop" works.
Software developers think "if AI automates coding, I will be able to spend less time on producing widgets, and more time on strategy and architecture."
Bosses think "if AI automates coding, I can get my devs to produce 100x more widgets."
Historically, automation tech has commonly made more work for people: the issue is WHICH people. Whether as an excuse for owners to increase the requirements for expectations in a given day, lessen the labor expected of men while raising the expectations for women, etc. "AI" isn't exceptional.
Let's for a while forget that Democrats can range from socialists to Trump supporters, and imagine that they are indeed a "leftist" party. There's a huge discrepancy between declared support for some politics and implementing the same in personal life.
see themselves as part of a bigger system. In software engineering this is even more prevalent, because the gains are substantial, while the downsides are frequently external (even if not, it's so easy to churn out gross explanations like "AI is the future, adapt or perish", which help you sleep
well). I am sick of being in such an environment, where externalities are either ignored or - at best - outweighed by apparent improvements. Nobody asbestcoding thinks that *they* will lose their job because of AI usage - they just need to be better at shoving asbestos than the loser next to them.
Let's for a while forget that Democrats can range from socialists to Trump supporters, and imagine that they are indeed a "leftist" party. There's a huge discrepancy between declared support for some politics and implementing the same in personal life.
I know people who'd openly support higher taxes and better public services, but also "optimize" their own taxes - frequently justifying it by their own special situation, while ignoring that their actual special situation is being in the top 5% of earners.
This does not apply only to high-earners. The dichotomy can also show when a person really wants safer, calmer traffic, but behind the wheel they ignore rules because it's convenient for them. When on their own, people will choose what's favourable for them, personally, at this moment, rather than
Capitalism is the reason this technology is in use. Without capitalism the generative AI would be like creating bullets for non-existent guns.
There's no single "innovation", it's shaped by the political system.
One of the things that also pisses me off is that in a vacuum, this technology is value-neutral. It's development in conjunction with the profit motive is what causes the worst aspect of it to manifest. The problem is not the technology itself, but is and has always been Capitalism.
I want everyone to stop saying AI is here to stay, AI is inevitable, all that crap. It's only "inevitable" if we all agree it is. This is how consent gets manufactured, and I'll have no part in it. Either I will piss on Claude's grave, or Claude will piss on mine. No compromise, no surrender.
i'm sympathetic to the fact that most laypeople don't grasp how advanced/powerful AI has gotten, especially in the realm of software development
i think it is more critical than ever for people to learn that the technology works really well, is here now, and we need to chart a new path forward
Age verification makes everyone less safe.
Age verification makes everyone less safe.
Age verification makes everyone less safe.
Age verification makes everyone less safe.
Age verification makes everyone less safe.
Age verification makes everyone less safe.
Looks like I should be worried about engineering quality at Google. (Pro tip: you absolutely don't need to review code less diligently because there's a lot of it).
It took a long time, but we finally added primary constructor syntax to Dart. If you want some (a lot) of background into how we designed it the way we did, I wrote a long blog post about it:
dart.dev/blog/bringin...#dartlang
Finished the @ironnestgame.bsky.social campaign yesterday, and while overall this is a great game (esp for autistics 😊), I expected some kind of twist - machine being taken over by anti-monarchists or something 🤔. There's still half of the map to explode^H^Hre! Anyway, 4/5, good fun.