Dan Goodman

Dan Goodman

@neural-reckoning.org

Computational neuroscientist at Imperial College. I like spikes and making science better (Neuromatch, Brian spiking neural network simulator, SNUFA annual workshop on spiking neurons). ๐Ÿงช https://neural-reckoning.org/ ๐Ÿ“ท https://adobe.ly/3On5B29

3.9K followers410 following3K posts

Pinned

New preprint (well, very updated). ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿง ๐Ÿงช We find that an abstract model of neuromodulation lets spiking neural networks perform much better, particularly in challenging noisy environments, using less energy. Relevant to #neuroscience and #neuromorphic computing. ๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡ www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

biorxiv.orgNeuromodulation enhances the capability and efficiency of spiking neural networksSpiking neurons underlie the brainโ€™s extreme energy efficiency, and therefore have great potential in neuromorphic computing, although realising this efficiency in practice has proven challenging. We ...

80 replies when I saw this, of which precisely one is not negative. That one is not positive btw.

Springer Nature@springernature.com

How can AI support researchers in peer review? Springer Nature and Google DeepMind are partnering to co-design an AI peer review assistant that helps reviewers navigate manuscripts and focus on where their scientific judgement matters most. Learn more: spklr.io/63320EVgT8

Dan Goodman reposted

We are hiring at @neuromatch.bsky.social ! Come join us to help build the Computational Behaviour course!!

Neuromatch@neuromatch.bsky.social

Neuromatch is hiring 2 Curriculum Specialists for Computational Behaviour! โžก๏ธ Position description: neuromatch.io/wp-content/u... ๐Ÿ™‹ Apply here: airtable.com/appBGDTJHkIq... Please share in your networks! #ComputationalNeuroscience #CollectiveBehaviour #NonprofitJob

Dan Goodman reposted

I'm happy to share my first contribution to The Transmitter. From its inception, AI has borrowed ideas and concepts from the brain's operations and mechanisms. The two field have a lot to gain from each other and we should work to make the bridge wider and stronger.

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social

A citation analysis reveals that the connection between the two fields is real and gaining momentum. But itโ€™s also narrow and tool-heavy; we need to find ways to widen it, writes @rcfduarte.bsky.social. @cnc-uc.bsky.social #neuroskyence www.thetransmitter.org/computationa...

I'm suddenly seeing a lot more genuine email going into my spam folder. I assume this is because the rise of LLM-written spam means that email providers have had to dial up the sensitivity of their filters. Another great contribution from AI.

I've seen this rush to use oral assessment either as a replacement or addition to coursework (because of LLMs) and I've been resisting it for the reasons below, but also because I think it inevitably favours self confident people, which isn't what we should be assessing.

Margot Finn@eicathomefinn.bsky.social

'Replacing written coursework with live verbal performance, without fundamentally reforming how oral tasks are designed and marked, risks systematically penalising students who stammer, as well as neurodivergent learners and those with other speech disfluencies.'

"Take Ofwat, the water regulator... the words river, pollution and sewage donโ€™t appear in its general duties." Another brilliant post by @laurenleek.eu combining data analysis and incisive systems level thinking about society.

Lauren Leek@laurenleek.eu

I analysed 40 years of British laws and found that society was the footnote. Dirty rivers, absurd train fares, families fighting for support: all share the same flaw: governments optimise the wrong things. Could software engineering offer a fix? laurenleek.substack.com/p/theres-no-...

New blog post: "we should resist ... using journal publication record as a key indicator of applicant suitability, because itโ€™s a system that shifts costs from the rich to the poor, slows down scientific progress as a whole, and bakes in discrimination" thesamovar.github.io/zavarka/hiri...

thesamovar.github.ioHiring based on journal publication record is inherently inequitableThe idea that we need journals and peer review as โ€˜proxies for good science workโ€™ because otherwise the academic hiring process would be too difficult is widespread (at least among senior scientists),...

There's a paper going around saying that AI is now better at peer review than humans. I won't link to it because I assume that like all these AI papers it's just some sort of marketing. My only comment is that we don't have to critique this paper because we already know human PR isn't very good.

Dan Goodman reposted

๐Ÿšจ New preprint! ๐Ÿงต Brain regions ๐Ÿง  integrate information over different timescales โฑ๏ธ: short in sensorimotor cortex, long in association cortex. But do regions change their timescales when we engage in a task? And how does that flexibility develop? ๐Ÿ‘‡ www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

biorxiv.orgTask-evoked flexibility of intrinsic neural timescales is hierarchically organized, behaviorally relevant, and refined across two developmental stagesCortical regions integrate temporal information over different timescales at rest, ranging from fast in sensorimotor regions to slow in the association cortex. Here, we study how far regions adapt the...

Dan Goodman reposted

Excited and proud to share this work, now published in PNAS. www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/... In this work, we identify neuromodulation as a high-dimensional reconfiguration signal that not only changes individual functional properties but also the statistical architecture linking them.

pnas.orgPNASProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
Fleur Zeldenrust@fleurzeldenrust.bsky.social

What do #neuromodulators do in the #brain? Two recent papers give new insights: @nishantjoshi.bsky.social shows they do not only reshape individual cellular properties, but also the architecture linking them, thereby expanding the computational repertoire. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

Very happy to see that neural heterogeneity is getting more attention. It's a great time to be studying this.

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social

Neurons in models are often all the sameโ€”some researchers are trying to change that. #neuroskyence By @natmesanash.bsky.social www.thetransmitter.org/systems-neur...

Lots of interesting articles suddenly appearing on the topic of how we can understand systems as complex as a brain, whose very nature is to be flexible. All converging on the idea that the type of answers we've been looking for are wrong. I guess the race is on to find a new type of answer.

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social

Many complex behaviors have stubbornly resisted mechanistic explanations. Deciphering them will require new approachesโ€”and perhaps a new concept of โ€œunderstanding,โ€ writes @olveczky.bsky.social. #neuroskyence www.thetransmitter.org/methods/what...

Inclined to agree that not all neural computations can be simplified elegantly. Also agree that this suggests we shift the problem to finding islands of explainability. Only place we'd differ I think is that I believe there's more explainable in neural computations than Konrad does. Time will tell!

Konrad Kording@kordinglab.bsky.social

Why We Systems Neuroscientists Should (Usually) Be Quietists: The Philosophical Logic of NeuroAI -- response to David Barack kording.substack.com/p/why-we-sys...

Preliminary take on why we can't argue from the failure of theories so far to the improbability of finding future theories: our scientific system in general, and the particular relationship between experimental and theoretical neuroscience so far, encourage incremental work over deeper.

Brilliant news that this book is free for anyone to download. Haven't read it yet, but scanned the conclusion. Many things I don't agree with as a strong advocate of dramatic changes to the way we do peer review, but super clear and reasoned argument. ๐Ÿ‘

Melinda Baldwin@mbaldwin.bsky.social

I am absolutely delighted to announce that the open access version of "In Referees We Trust? How Peer Review Became a Mark of Scientific Legitimacy" is now live! Want to know more about how scholars' lives came to be ruled by Reviewer 2? Download the book FREE at: direct.mit.edu/books/monogr...

Dan Goodman reposted

How much representational diversity exists around a trained network? A lot, it turns out! Moving a ViTโ€™s weights by 1.3% while preserving its predictions, its representations end up less similar to the original than a random-init ViTโ€™s โ€ผ๏ธ New paper: Hessian Null Space Continuation (HNC) ๐Ÿ’ซ๐Ÿงต (1/12)

Dan Goodman reposted

I am really glad this work from the Statistical Physics of Cognition project is finally out as a preprint. It settles a lot of confusion in the work on the Brain Criticality Hypothesis by separating out the impact of stimulus and arousal on driving brain activity towards or away from criticality.

Simon Schultz@simonschultz.bsky.social

1/4 Our new preprint is out on bioRxiv: Arousal-informed neuronal avalanches operate near criticality. We investigate whether neuronal activity in awake cortex operates near a critical point, and how this relates to sensory stimulation and arousal. doi.org/10.64898/202...

This is a great read. I will say that I think big-O notation and complexity analysis is useful and not just a mathematical game. But it's not a substitute for actually thinking. It's not the full story. Most of the textbooks you read about it do make this clear, even if people forget it in practice.

Ben Recht@beenwrekt.bsky.social

OpenAIโ€™s faster Fourier transform is less a mathematical breakthrough and more a malicious exploit of mathematical traditions.

Hahahaha they generated their fake data using seed(42) which let someone exactly reproduce their pipeline. ๐Ÿ˜‚

Neuroskeptic@neuroskeptic.bsky.social

This is an astonishing @pubpeer.com post: pubpeer.com/publications... The author compares data points from a figure against random numbers produced with a certain seed, finding r > 0.999999996! ๐Ÿซ  Could there be any possible innocent explanation? The paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Dan Goodman reposted

Thinking about and studying the way science functions and how it could do better is important work. It's amazing that the UK has a specific metascience unit to do this. But what a shame that instead of doing so they're investing in projects to study how AI can automate research evaluation.

Margot Finn@eicathomefinn.bsky.social

'The UK Metascience Unit is funding a cohort of research projects, each focused on how artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to measure different aspects of research quality, including originality, rigour, and societal impact. This document explains the rationale behind these investments.'

Dan Goodman reposted

Replying to @richardsever.bsky.social

In a world of ongoing post publication review you don't need retraction because when you open the paper you see all the comments showing the problems. The idea of retraction inherently builds in the idea of a reliable authority that is precisely the mechanism that makes fraudulent papers a problem.

Dan Goodman reposted

Replying to @cianodonnell.bsky.social

Math isn't being devastated. A bunch of medium hard to quite hard problems that humans have made up and worked on extensively are getting finished off by AI. AI is also a great way for mathematicians to learn more math. The future is unpredictable, but I wouldn't declare devastation just yet.

This is going straight to the top of the to-read pile! Very excited to see this.

PessoaBrain@pessoabrain.bsky.social

๐—›๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป New preprint with Andrea Gambarotto. Neuroscience often treats control as a hierarchy: the structures behind a behavior hold a stable rank. We argue this mistakes a configuration for an architecture. ๐Ÿงต arxiv.org/abs/2610.04643 #neuroskyence

Dan Goodman reposted

๐—›๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป New preprint with Andrea Gambarotto. Neuroscience often treats control as a hierarchy: the structures behind a behavior hold a stable rank. We argue this mistakes a configuration for an architecture. ๐Ÿงต arxiv.org/abs/2610.04643 #neuroskyence

Fascinating insights into the early history of Zotero, including the fact that the name is the Albanian word for "to learn well or master". Hats off to everyone involved in this project. Also if you're not using Zotero, why not? Dump that closed rubbish you're using now and switch.

This post is unavailable.

Dan Goodman reposted

I first wrote about the need to recognize peer reviews as acts of scholarship back in 2006. It's a dream deferred, but not a dream denied. We're going to make this happen.

Publish-Review-Curate (PRC) Alliance@prcalliance.bsky.social

In the Publish-Review-Curate model, peer review is given the recognition it deserves! The current publication system makes this important work invisible and doesnโ€™t properly recognize it. Learn more about the Publish-Review-Curate model. ๐Ÿ‘‡ publish-review-curate.org

Dan Goodman reposted

Join us for ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ, a multidisciplinary gathering designed for researchers, funders, technologists, and policymakers to meet, exchange ideas & make new connections. ๐Ÿ“… June 16โ€“18, 2027 | Montreal ๐Ÿ‘‰ ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ | ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜‚๐˜€ www.convergescience.org #๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ณ #OpenScience #CallForโ€ฆ

Dan Goodman reposted

I am able to take on new doctoral students through this amazing initiative! If you are interested please reach out to me by email to discuss.

Steve Fleming@smfleming.bsky.social

Excited to be launching our new PhD program in Minds and Machines at UCL with co-Directors Tali Sharot and @nadinedijkstra.bsky.social To apply, find out more here: www.ucl.ac.uk/brain-scienc... Our launch event is on Nov 10th, with a cracking lineup of speakers: luma.com/cikzcth0

This feels like an important and worthwhile topic for our field to be discussing. A lot (but not all) of our cherished questions seem less and less relevant as ML algorithms advance. What's left? Will probably post some of my thoughts on this later.

Shahab Bakhtiari@shahabbakht.bsky.social

I had a feeling recently that seems to be corroborated by chats with colleagues, so I decided to share it here. A lot of systems neuroscientists driven by algorithmic-level questions are going through what looks and feels like a research depression. ๐Ÿงต (1/n) ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ“ˆ #NeuroAI

My initial thoughts here: bsky.app/profile/neur...

Dan Goodman@neural-reckoning.org

My initial take on this is that yes some of our previous questions are either solved or feel less relevant. But, scaling isn't producing human like intelligence. There are still fascinating questions. How do we learn and compute with so little sample data and energy? for example.

Dan Goodman reposted

Excited to first share @alishdipani.bsky.social 's study. Alish asked a (deceptively) simple Q: Are category-selective units in ANNs actually like category-selective regions in the brain? (why is this imp? read until the end). #neuroskyence #neuroscience #brain #neuroai

Apurva Ratan Murty@apurvaratan.bsky.social

Iโ€™ve been pretty terrible at talking about our work online. Iโ€™m going to try to fix that! There are a bunch of things from the lab Iโ€™d love to share, so look out for new work you may not know about over the coming days! :)

This was my first time going to #BernsteinConference and I really enjoyed it. Would definitely recommend going next year. Particularly enjoyed the workshops and posters. Overall vibe was ๐Ÿ‘‡