Peter M.
Peter M.
@peteman115.bsky.social
Volunteer Teacher, Board Member and Investor. No DMs.
249 followers104 following439 posts
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Less for More open.substack.com/pub/profgmed... Great article about healthcare by Scott Galloway, including concrete proposals.
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
"Rep. María Salazar was asked whether Trump’s ban violated the First Amendment. She shrugged it off: 'I think that he has his own style and that he will determine who he wants to talk to.' There’s a name for that style. It’s 'fascism.'"
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Jared Kushner is not "on the other side of the aisle." He's not an elected official. He's not an administration official. He's the president's son-in-law and a private citizen. You do not, in fact, have to take meetings with relatives of the president. Some might even say you should *not* do that
Jeffries defends his meeting with Kushner: "I'm of the view that if we're going to be committed to actually solving problems on behalf of the American people ... they're are gonna be times that you have to speak with people on the other side of the aisle. Even people you strongly disagree with."
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
The idiot said he would bring prices, not inflation, down. Then he imposed tariffs, increasing prices. Except for eggs, he hasn’t brought either down.
Tim Scott: "The original sin of costs in America in the last eight years goes back to Joe Biden." Welker: "President Trump has been in office for two years." Tim Scott: "Let me finish. Let me finish. Let me finish. Let me finish. President Trump has brought inflation down."
Peter M. reposted
Hear, hear!
Legacy media failed Americans once again on Sun. by not posing a single question about the Epstein Files & contempt of court to Todd Blanche. Instead, he made blanket assertions w/no push-back or follow-up. At least independent media is independent, even if the DOJ isn’t. youtu.be/RLpl0ILXCXo?...
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
"As the name implies, the bill is intended to honor the legacy of the late South Carolina Republican and to punish Russia via sanctions. In reality, it does neither." @crampell.bsky.social on a questionable new bill, in the latest edition of Receipts:
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
Peter M. reposted
There’s always a payoff.
Under Trump, the CFTC has dropped investigations into Kalshi and Polymarket, announced its opposition to states’ attempts to regulate them, and made no moves to crack down on insider trading. Donald Trump, Jr. is an advisor to both Kalshi and Polymarket. Always follow the money.
Peter M. reposted