ProfAFinlayson

ProfAFinlayson

@profafinlayson.bsky.social

Prof of Political & Social Theory @ UEA: regularly a political theorist, often a political analyst, always a rhetorician. Sometimes I teach people how to make political speeches; usually they are happy about it. Mostly I study Reactionary Digital Politics.

3.2K followers477 following816 posts

The thing is, she chose to tell this (half-true?) story to advertise her product. It’s meant as a selling point. The thought must be that people want to be freed from domestic/personal relations so they can focus on work. I wonder why that’s not selling well?

David Gura@davidgura.bsky.social

cool, cool

ProfAFinlayson reposted

The Red Wall is a myth, a spook story that British politicians must worship at the altar of: do what I tell you or the Red Wall will get you. It is made up. It has long since lost contact with its original definition. It encourages people to confuse places and people. It is past its sell by date.

conservativehome.comNeville Lishman: The door is ajar in the Red Wall - we can open it further | Conservative HomeLet’s treat everyone we speak to as someone who was once most likely with us in 2019, who shares similar values and similar aspirations.  These voters are not gone, they just feel let down. The stakes...

ProfAFinlayson reposted

It shouldn’t bother me so much, but when people use ‘one bad apple’ they never complete the thought ‘spoils the whole barrel’. In other words it typically doesn’t mean what is intended, but it’s the unintended, correct, meaning that is typically true, in sweet revenge for linguistic purists.

An answer to the question: ‘What happens when a nation’s ruling class is thirty-somethings who’ve learned about the world from comic book movies, Something Awful, video games & poorly digested cybernetics?’ Answer: It rationalises consuming the spectacle of violent cruelty as liberation.

Mother Jones@motherjones.com

One military technology company co-founder who declared he had “been outspoken on wanting public executions for over a decade” suggested that non-public executions were fascist.

ProfAFinlayson reposted

I did a panel the other day where we talked about the cost of compute as being a massively limiting factor, but for lots of AI purchasers that cost is still being masked by VC/investor money so the vulnerabilities are high but hidden wch leads to scepticism

Jason Koebler@jasonkoebler.bsky.social

New: I pulled the Character ai bankruptcy documents. They show: - They were spending $14 million/month on compute alone at a time their revenue was around ~$1 million/month - Currently losing $9 million a month - They admitted they enshittified & that it didnt work www.404media.co/character-ai...

CPP with F&G live! That’s me with @jemgilbert.bsky.social podcasting ‘live from London’. This time the theme is ‘everything’.

The Autonomy Institute@autonomy-institute.bsky.social

NEW EVENT: Join us next month for another live recording of the Culture, Power, Politics Podcast with Alan Finlayson & @jemgilbert.bsky.social 🎤 'The Conjuncture' Thurs 12th Nov, 18:30 Oxford House, Bethnal Green Sign-up 👇 actionnetwork.org/events/cultu...

ProfAFinlayson reposted

ProfAFinlayson reposted

Death by a thousand cuts as universities revoke international offers "en masse" of prospective students from Bangladesh, Nigeria and Pakistan to avoid losing ability to recruit international students. More job losses and course closures predicted in consequence. giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/...

giftarticle.ft.comUK universities withdraw offers from international students to avoid blanket banPullback comes in response to doubling in number of study visas being refused by the Home Office in the first six months of 2026

ProfAFinlayson reposted

ProfAFinlayson reposted

1. Two thoughts on the AB speech A) Just more — much more — ground traversed with big political arguments than the average leader’s speech. Not just care/pensions, but PR, housing/property, Brexit etc etc B) Almost exactly in tune with the median LP member on nearly all these topics

Also looking to bet on the publication of an academic article (within the next 24 months) along the lines of: " 'All Together Now' or 'Everybody in the Place'? Left Nostalgia, Subcultural Affect and Ideological Division in British Politics from 1997 to 2026".

ProfAFinlayson reposted

'The Westminster government’s contribution to funding domestic undergraduates studying in England fell in real terms from £8.9 billion in 2012-13 to just £3.3bn in 2024-25, a drop of more than 60 per cent, an analysis has found.'

Research Professional News@resprofnews.bsky.social

Government funds just 16p in every £1 spent on teaching. Balance of higher education funding now “badly out of whack”, says Universities UK chief. www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-u...

I get the appeal & political value of nostalgia. But Cortonwood colliery closed 40 yrs ago. The site is now a shopping & leisure centre. I really want a government that proceeds from analysis of now not a past it imagines ‘hope’ can bring back. History matters. So do sociology & Political Economy.

They’re talking about Fabians coz they think that’s when Marxists first hid (original logo was a wolf in sheeps clothing); along with Tavistock it’s ground zero for critical theory/cultural Marxism. An was an obscure in 1980s but now sorta mainstream in MAGA/Reform. I’m sure Braverman thinks this.

Sunder Katwala (sundersays)@sundersays.bsky.social

This balaclava-clad mob were reading out a weird & imtimidating message about Fabians, Zionists and others outside Bluecoat before dispersing

Wait, what? There’s a Secretary of State for Culture?

James Butler@piercepenniless.bsky.social

When was the last time our Secretary of State for Culture displayed anything approaching this degree of public enthusiasm for our world-class arts industry? Has she been seen anywhere? Given impending charter renewal... did she even bother to visit a single prom?

ProfAFinlayson reposted

Kind of grimly fascinating as always, coming from the former director of strategy to a Labour PM. There just isn't a future for a centre-left politics that is this hostile to pretty basic progressive values.

For once I am VERY interested in Labour Conference esp. 'the speech'. We'll learn a lot from it (and get a strong sense of what our fate in this country will be: the status quo and further decline into barbarism or a collective new course which we can all (well most) help row towards...(1/x)

View full thread

But I also think (and this isn't a party-political point) the UK needs Lab to succeed. It just *is* what stands between us and barbarism. And I am so gloomy that actually I can be optimistic about any little thing. Burnham *is* a good politician. He understands something about what's broken. (9/x)

I think he's ambitious & wants to be a historic politician (not just an apprentice hoping for a post with Palantir). We'll get a lot of sentimentality in the speech I'm sure but we'll see if he's *any* analysis & is bold enough to name enemies & to ask friends if he can lead them. We'll see (10/10).

For once I am VERY interested in Labour Conference esp. 'the speech'. We'll learn a lot from it (and get a strong sense of what our fate in this country will be: the status quo and further decline into barbarism or a collective new course which we can all (well most) help row towards...(1/x)

View full thread

I think we won't get all that - or much of it. I figure in Whitehall it looks easier and more rational to align with existing powers (international, techno etc.) not least because they offer you a post-politics job. But also because Lab is very wedded to tradition (7/x)

I find it not a very pragmatic movement - it understands 'pragmatism' through a nostalgic prism of past battles so that 'pragmatic' means 'not doing all those things we thought we believed in' rather than 'analysing rigorously where we are and what can be done and what we need to do it' (8/x).

For once I am VERY interested in Labour Conference esp. 'the speech'. We'll learn a lot from it (and get a strong sense of what our fate in this country will be: the status quo and further decline into barbarism or a collective new course which we can all (well most) help row towards...(1/x)

View full thread

If it really wants to introduce change on the scale needed (& I'm not sure it grasps just how badly everything is broken & the *radical* nature of reform needed) then Lab needs to generate power. It needs to win people over not to what it'lll do 'for' them but to what all will have to do (5/x).

That's where the ideas do come in (& the rhetoric to articulate them & the 'vibes' that attach people to them). It's also why you need to declare an enemy (real or abstract) and set out how to lead a nation (perhaps against the ethnonationalists that want to destroy it) (6/x).

For once I am VERY interested in Labour Conference esp. 'the speech'. We'll learn a lot from it (and get a strong sense of what our fate in this country will be: the status quo and further decline into barbarism or a collective new course which we can all (well most) help row towards...(1/x)

View full thread

Simultaneously, it's no longer very good at ideas & is *widly* incapable of understanding that it's up against political forces with not just different ideas but a totally different political cosmology & who are very into using power in all forms: physical force, financial, ideological etc. (3/x)

Labour ministers often complain they 'pull levers' and nothing happens. Then they blame the civil service. But the reality is that they have limited power. Lab has almost no power now. Govt. power is constrained by other powers (international, industrial, financial, physical etc.) (4/x)

For once I am VERY interested in Labour Conference esp. 'the speech'. We'll learn a lot from it (and get a strong sense of what our fate in this country will be: the status quo and further decline into barbarism or a collective new course which we can all (well most) help row towards...(1/x)

Labour has drifted into this position where it sort of thinks politics is all about ideas/debate (& 'narrative' vibes) rather than power and interests; that government is the only power that matters & you just need policies fitted to limits, not any sort of socio-cultural-econ analysis)...(2/x)

I watched the 70-up finale. Finally it really is about the English class system - the rise of the media/cultural 'intelligentsia' gazing at society from "outside", judging everyone in it by their standards & pretending to be 'the public'. Then all types unite against them. That's the 21st Century!

I hear AI changes everything but I'll stick my neck out & say that right now weight loss drugs (GLP-1s) are having a more fundamental impact on our culture: on food production, eating out, the labour market in hospitality etc. & that's before we consider the wider behaviour changes the drugs induce.

thegrocer.co.ukThe weight-loss boom reshaping the dairy sectorFor GLP-1 users with smaller appetites, every calorie counts - and dairy is caught in the crossroads of functionality and indulgence

We focus on the shiny 'big' technologies but the tiny oral contraceptive pill changed *everything* in ways we are still working out. More than cars. Statins & beta-blockers have extended life, affecting basic existential outlooks and creating the single largest healthcare policy challenge we face.

What's the threshold beyond which hacking a government isn't a crime but a mistake? Teenagers get deported for it. Extortion via ransomware is still wrong, right? But if your company has a certain size, fame or market cap, it's not crime? Or is it power? Asking for a friend in a rogue state.