Dan

Dan

@rdsmth.bsky.social

Trying to think well

80 followers94 following199 posts

I feel so much contempt for the president and trustees of the University of Chicago. What they are doing to it is unforgivable. The traditional Core, however imperfect, was peerless. It was a whole world unto itself. Without it, the College is just another college.

There are self-serving political reasons for this too, but ideologically, this flows directly from getting housing issues wrong. Left-NIMBYism is a serious conceptual error that will lead them into a political dead end, or cause them to abandon left politics entirely

This post is unavailable.

Dan reposted

It's worth noting that while James Redfield was one of a kind, he was also probably the final living avatar of the Hutchins vision of the University of Chicago. With him, a whole world passes.

Thomas Bartscherer@tbartscherer.bsky.social

Farewell, James Redfield. A singular voice in 20th century classical studies, an inimitable teacher, and a very funny guy. Chair of the Committee on Social Thought at the age of 34. Still teaching well into his 80s. He has died at 91.

Dan reposted

CDOT Commissioner Cheaks should announce on Monday morning that the city will be phasing out "door zone" bike lanes starting immediately, as they are inherently deadly.

With Sonny Rollins an era passes.

Sonny Rollins@thesonnyrollins.bsky.social

It is with deep sorrow and profound love that we announce the passing of Sonny Rollins. The Saxophone Colossus died this afternoon at his home in Woodstock, NY at the age of 95. 1/2

Dan reposted

It's the same as the time I tried to get my toddler to try ice cream and he screamed and cried and insisted he hated it. He was wrong, obviously. So are the transportation haters. A better world is possible and even they would love it

Wedge LIVE!™@wedge.live

Transportation politics is about dragging people kicking and screaming into change that results fairly quickly in a widespread consensus that we can't imagine going back to the way it was before.

The full realization of liberal values, which in the history of liberalism has never yet been achieved, always has been a revolutionary doctrine. It is a bright spot in our dark times that we are all being forced to remember it!

ben chambers 🏴@benjaminchambers.bsky.social

liberalism is a radical and revolutionary doctrine again

Though arguably it’s in reckoning with the obstacles to a fully realized liberalism that the path to socialism lies …

Dan reposted

The political press very clearly understands “truth” as a social agreement, a compromise position between everyone important enough to have an opinion. It did not reflect on how this would allow dedicated liars to go all-in on lies again and again and dramatically shift the position.

my emerging theory is that the political press literally does not believe in objective reality in any meaningful sense. there is only what A says and what B says and how that affects the horse race

We all know the internet and esp social media have transformed society, but the mechanism and nature of these changes aren’t well theorized. Anthropologists should illuminate this by tracing the history of the disconnection of the social location of interaction from its physical location

From books to telegraph and telephone, to early more or less unidirectional mass media such as cinema and television, later bidirectional and many-directional ones (usenet/forums, chat rooms, AIM), and ultimately to mass social media with potentially unbounded participant frameworks (such as this)

What we call social media (which are really *mass* social media in which large publics participate; forums and chat rooms were social media too but without the mass character) are the culmination of a historical series, and we can begin to see its effects by mapping the effects of each prior stage

I would reply if I could to ask, is there any viable path to annexation of at least many of these? It seems like the most just path forward for the city and region, and yet politically all but impossible

Star:Line Chicago@starlinechicago.bsky.social

Not many surprises in the Chicagoland map (Rosemont and McCook/Bedford Park doing their thing), but I think it does provide a great visualization as to how the Balkanization of the inner burbs (especially West Cook and the Southland) work against suburban residents, not for them.

Urbanism isn't just a pet issue, it's a broad vision of what our way of life should be in urbanized society. It is essential, not incidental, to a viable social-democratic or socialist politics. Both philosophically and practically, it's a prerequisite for plural, egalitarian democratic society

Dan reposted

PSA to any Dems who plan on running for president in 2028: now is the perfect time to call for Schumer to step down and for the 8 Vichy Dems to be primaried

With tonight's shameful surrender, this assessment sadly still looks right.

Dan@rdsmth.bsky.social

Is there any way to defeat all this other than replacing the sclerotic Democratic leadership with more adequate people, then winning a trifecta that is strong enough (not hamstrung by Manchins & Sinemas) to turn it all back, eliminate the filibuster and pack the court? Is even that feasible?

One of the most important discoveries of social science is that our lived experience—no matter how sincerely felt and accurately reported—can nevertheless be false. So lived experience, though never to be lightly dismissed, cannot be the foundation of a political epistemology.

Yelp and all the other online review platforms have obliterated this distinction for many people, to my endless frustration

jamelle@jamellebouie.net

regular reminder that when i say something is my *favorite* that is distinct from saying it is *the best*.

True criticism judges things based on established canons or personal frameworks cultivated in a body of published work. Online reviewers all imagine themselves as little critics but rarely do more than air their reflexive opinions, which are far from the same thing.

I think Hubert Dreyfus's intuitions about the intrinsic limitations of AI are still right, do still (with appropriate adjustments) apply to LLMs, and will apply to any future attempt at AI that is not embodied in more or less the same way we are.

His approach is based on Heidegger. A semiotic version is also possible and will reach similar conclusions. For example, language is the metapragmatic of the world. Our language will always be meaningless to an AI that cannot access our world, so it will never achieve what we consider intelligence.

Sociological question that housing policy discussions almost never address: what are the actual boundaries of the market area within which a supply-demand relationship operates, or the effects of some intervention are to be measured, etc?

Markets are social structures, after all. They have real characteristics, such as geographical location/extent, that we have to study empirically, and we can't assume they directly coincide with our folk geographical categories (regions, cities, neighborhoods, etc).

Put these everywhere in Chicago. Infrared heaters under the awning, they’ll do fabulous business all year round

clem hazzard@clout-strive.bsky.social

there should be a coffee kiosk in every park of a certain size. they spell it "quiosque" in lisbon

Coffee, food, convenience store items, so much commerce could happen on our sidewalks. Easy path to business ownership for whole new classes of Chicagoans, great for public safety since you get a ton of people with a vested interest in preventing street crime at no cost to the taxpayer, etc etc

Is there any way to defeat all this other than replacing the sclerotic Democratic leadership with more adequate people, then winning a trifecta that is strong enough (not hamstrung by Manchins & Sinemas) to turn it all back, eliminate the filibuster and pack the court? Is even that feasible?

Chicago really needs a permanent indoor public market (i.e., year round farmers' market, but with butcher, fishmonger, bakery, prepared food stalls, et al.). Operated as a co-op I think. Anybody got a few million dollars and a suitable building?

Would have to keep rent very low for the vendors to create a clear advantage over operating their own storefront (which, judging from the pace of closure of dedicated butcher shops over the last decade, just to take one example, I gather is increasingly prohibitive).

You are up to date.