Dan
Dan reposted
It's worth noting that while James Redfield was one of a kind, he was also probably the final living avatar of the Hutchins vision of the University of Chicago. With him, a whole world passes.
Farewell, James Redfield. A singular voice in 20th century classical studies, an inimitable teacher, and a very funny guy. Chair of the Committee on Social Thought at the age of 34. Still teaching well into his 80s. He has died at 91.
Dan reposted
Dan reposted
It's the same as the time I tried to get my toddler to try ice cream and he screamed and cried and insisted he hated it. He was wrong, obviously. So are the transportation haters. A better world is possible and even they would love it
Transportation politics is about dragging people kicking and screaming into change that results fairly quickly in a widespread consensus that we can't imagine going back to the way it was before.
Dan reposted
The political press very clearly understands “truth” as a social agreement, a compromise position between everyone important enough to have an opinion. It did not reflect on how this would allow dedicated liars to go all-in on lies again and again and dramatically shift the position.
my emerging theory is that the political press literally does not believe in objective reality in any meaningful sense. there is only what A says and what B says and how that affects the horse race
I would reply if I could to ask, is there any viable path to annexation of at least many of these? It seems like the most just path forward for the city and region, and yet politically all but impossible
Not many surprises in the Chicagoland map (Rosemont and McCook/Bedford Park doing their thing), but I think it does provide a great visualization as to how the Balkanization of the inner burbs (especially West Cook and the Southland) work against suburban residents, not for them.
Dan reposted
With tonight's shameful surrender, this assessment sadly still looks right.
Is there any way to defeat all this other than replacing the sclerotic Democratic leadership with more adequate people, then winning a trifecta that is strong enough (not hamstrung by Manchins & Sinemas) to turn it all back, eliminate the filibuster and pack the court? Is even that feasible?
You are up to date.