πŸ‘»πŸ‘ƒπŸŽƒ

πŸ‘»πŸ‘ƒπŸŽƒ

@waxrepli.ca

Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri stan account. serial dabbler, itinerant gravekeeper. Submarine Qualified. Made in AK, Learning architecture in Baltimore, MD - "America's Only City" I Will Not turn on autocorrect. he/him

583 followers679 following3.5K posts

Reached the point in the adhd hobby/fixation cycle where i wake up one day and forget why i even liked the damn thing in the first place. But for my degree program. It took longer than usual but we were always headed this way.

πŸ‘»πŸ‘ƒπŸŽƒ reposted

If you would try to win by abandoning trans people (or any targeted group) you can save this β€œwe need to win” talk; there is no β€œwe.” I am about solidarity, and you have chosen anti-solidarity. You are not any β€œwe” I recognize. You are the enemy I’m trying to defeat. Beating you is how my β€œwe” wins.

Court packing has this reputation of being a norms crisis third rail but its just a thing they can do. The court has been a political creature since its inception. Courts are an organ of politics. The alternative is to impeach justices. Both would be ideal.

Steve Vladeck@stevevladeck.bsky.social

Calls for expanding #SCOTUS are entirely (and increasingly) understandable. But as today's "One First" explains, there are at least four difficult questions that those who support expansion should have to answerβ€”especially as compared to other possible reforms: www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-257-...

Every safe incumbent dem in the house who sails through in '26 needs a bloodthirsty primary challenger lined up for '28 who will hold them to delivering justice against the trump administration. A (D) by your name can't be enough anymore.

If u live in a city you can get sausages from the store that were made by a family business half a mile away. If the city is baltimore you can do that and not even feel bougie.

πŸ‘»πŸ‘ƒπŸŽƒ reposted

Replying to @dankaszeta.bsky.social

You can be an expert on things you are opposed to. Just because you have knowledge of something and can explain it in detail, it does not necessarily follow that you are a proponent of them