Yokem reposted
Yokem
Yokem
@yokem.signalfd.com
Around here, I am what I have to say. No more, no less. Descriptive != Prescriptive. Understanding why something works the way it does is critical to making the thing better.
166 followers123 following2.1K posts
I was a senior in high school at a Denver area HS when Columbine happened. And then it kept happening. Just 4 years ago here in Bend at Safeway. These events aren't some unquestionable force of nature. We do not need to live this way.
The only thing more heartbreaking than these things is that we don't do anything to prevent the next one
Yokem reposted
I hope Musk in particular recognizes that if he chooses to make the Ukrainians his enemy, they will fight him. And that he has a huge amount of very soft infrastructure targets that the SBU could potentially reach.
Trump and Musk are doing their best to help Putin kill Ukrainians. kyivindependent.com/this-cannot-...
There's a few things that can be done wrt spacex services. Government launches can probably be shifted to a combo of Blue Origin, ULA, and maybe one or two of the newer providers. Starlink/starshield is a heavier lift to replace but Amazon's constellation is getting there.
is there anyone thinking/writing about the actual mechanics of disentangling the US government from elon musk?
This is pretty in line with what would be expected from a Maslow's hierarchy of needs approach to politics. When there isn't a clear threat to safety, cultural differences have way more salience. When there is a serious threat, those issues/differences subside.
Calling my shot: we will see less than half as many pundit-consultant pieces about this Latino realignment as we saw in the other direction 2021-2025, because a Latino blue shift doesn’t fit the Dems-Too-Woke narrative
In the US that is. The Chinese seem to be doing pretty well at just making the things more effective, useful and efficient without going insane.
It is a little disconcerting that so many people who know a lot about LLMs on a technical level appear to go a little insane. It would be like if there was a really cool and effective new kind of pen, and for some reason about 40% of the people involved in the pen making process went mad.
As someone who studied history and now works in a technical field: History is best understood as a practice of taking the time to understand how things got to be the way they are now. Which is critically important if you want to make the present better. Which, is a very big part of engineering.
Am I missing something here? In what universe would an engineering student ever study history?! Do many history students study engineering?! I *enjoyed* history at school, and I was *good* at it. But no way would I ever have studied it at university.
Yokem reposted
Could this be the bit that gets Kash fired? It's ridiculous and embarrassing enough that it might just make Trump pull the trigger...
PATEL: The previous regulation automatically disqualified any individual who participated in either side of it KENNEDY: Either side of beastiality? So you disqualified the animal? P: Well, we have great canines, but we're not going to disqualify them K: I'm trying to understand why you did this.
Yokem reposted
Replying to @resnikoff.bsky.social
To be clear, I am not an “AI is a scam” guy. I find this tech fascinating and powerful and potentially very dangerous, albeit not world-ending. But scientists are also driving the net cost of electricity toward zero and designing boutique mRNA vaccines. That’s at least an equally huge deal!
A very wide and broad bubble was inflated on top of deep precarity. So, when it popped, the effects were much more devastating throughout the economy. The chaos Trump, the GOP, and their sponsors are causing now, is an effort to recreate that precarity.
I gotta ask, if even the absolute chaos Trump is throwing at the economy isn't bringing it to its knees, what the heck happened in 2008 that did seemingly bring the economy to its knees?
The nightclub scene in John Wick - the initial half of gentle singing of Think by Kalaida contrasts with the brutal violence perfectly. Then the techno beats adds rhythm to the rest of the sequence... m.youtube.com/watch?v=t4vr...
The problem is that I'm not sure they can actually ban them. They probably can regulate anyone offering them via an API, but as long as the logic of Bernstein vs US is upheld and applied to models and their weights, the distribution of the models will be difficult to ban.
lol two months ago OpenAI was signing a letter about how important open weights models were and now their house propagandist is saying “we will ban open weights and you will thank us for it”. You can’t hate this company enough
Yokem reposted
Yokem reposted
Yokem reposted
Replying to @orko.bsky.social
the neoliberals became centrists who want to restrict immigration and trans rights the left became neoliberals who want to cut taxes and open borders the centrists became [checks notes] left wing partisans who want to water the tree of liberty with the blood of the tyrant? am i reading that right?
Yokem reposted
There are ~3 layers to this I think - 1) where your parents grew up, 2) where you grew up, and 3) where you've spent a good chunk of your adult life.
Though I live in Iowa and grew up in Iowa, I’ve never really had a distinctive Iowa dialect or accent and what I did have largely washed out from moving around so much.
Yokem reposted
My extremely boring hypothesis is that it's due to the University of Michigan switching its sampling methodology from CATI to online panels in 2024. Maybe it's social desirability bias, maybe it's the nature of who signs up for panels vs picking the phone and agreeing to answer questions.
It doesn't make a lick of sense that Trump's economic approval is as low as it is, and people convincing themselves that voters are simply being rational about his bad policies are engaged in a dangerous self-delusion. Is the economy great? Not really. Is it BY FAR THE WORST IN 50 YEARS?? Uh, no.
Legitimacy of this kind of thing also matters. And you get that when you win an election making it clear that a) the court is corrupt, and b) expansion/reform (of some kind) is going to be done to fix it.
I don't agree with that. Because there is zero chance of whipping the votes, building the consensus if it's not public. I explain in this piece. talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/clybu...