Post

2/ Starting strong by positioning ending the war as a choice for Europe to make. Putin just wanted a 'sensible security pact', that's why he enshrined Russian ownership of four regions of Ukraine into the Russian constitution and tried to take Kyiv. Just a smol, sensible bean.

3/ So much to unpack here. First, the 'forever war' in this case is entirely Putin's choice. He could declare 'victory' or 'mission accomplished' or nothing at all and just withdraw to Russia's borders at literally any time. Macron isn't dragooning Russian troops into attacks on Kherson.

4/ The sanctions bit of this is also very dumb. It assumes Europeans thought sanctions would, for pretty much the first time in human history, topple a regime. Not signal opposition (which they did) Not slow down Russia's economy (which they did) Not starve Russia's warmachine (which they did).

5/ Yeah dude, Russia's economy is going great guns. They're crushing it. This is the kind of economic inisght and analysis that made Yanis such an invaluable asset to Greece. Is monthly inflation of 6% and a 15% interest rate good, Yanis? Military Keynsianism lmao.

39 reposts580 likes

6/ The strategy has been give Ukraine support so it can keep killing Russians until the price becomes unsustainable. It's not a perfect plan, and it's one both Europe and the US have been interrmitent on executing, but it's clearly working. Don't take my word for it, read Russian mil-bloggers.

7/ *"What the fuck are you talking about, Jesse?" meme* So a (US created) energy crisis in April of 2026 will compel the EU to abandon Ukraine and accept a peace deal that will see US owned pipelines that won't be finished for years eventually sell it Russian gas? Are you fucking high buddy?

8/ Every analyst who actually knows what they're talking about has been clear that while higher oil/gas prices as a result of the Strait crisis offer a reprieve for Russia, they don't solve any of their problems. It's a bandaid, not a prosthetic. Also, Ukrainian drones are working on it 😘.

Patrick Lovell The Producer @patricklovellpresentsthecleannewdeal.com

The Great David Byrne once said, "Same as it Ever Was!" Why was he right? Follow the pipelines. At the end you may discover The Clean New Deal is the only way forward. #TheCleanNewDeal youtu.be/zyGI6XkbLE4

9/ The 'hitler' stuff makes me really angry, because as always it positions the real problem not as the bad people doing bad things, but as the tone and linguistic choices of those condemning them. It's the "sure misogyny is bad, but feminists are so LOUD" of geopolotics. Fuck off Yanis.

Exactly. Russia’s net oil export capability is almost completely destroyed on various fronts. Russia is even importing refined products because Ukraine has managed to destroy so much of Russia’s refining capabilities. And China is flooding the globe with a cheap alternative to oil.

Climate News@climatenews.bsky.social

Ukraine is doing the world a massive favour by destroying Russian oil & gas infrastructure while the corrupt U.S. President who is a convicted rapist continues to reduce sanctions on Russian oil China is doing the world a massive favour by destroying demand for Russian oil & gas with cheap solar.

in fact the Ukrainian counter offensive is doing well and Ukraine is now killing Russians faster than Putin can recruit. Morale in Russian side is collapsing and internet ban suggests things far from rosy on Russian side. Ukraine has a much better chance of winning now than previously.

Aside from such vanity seeming slightly more incongruous on the left, isn't it equally common across the political spectrum? It isn't hard to think of self-adoring individuals from left, right and centre.

That much was crystal clear with his stupid little Paris Match photoshoot. Not to pat myself on the back, but I correctly appraised him as a self-promoting idiot as soon as he appeared.

"Military Keynesianism" is when you pay people to dig useless holes, except this time the vatniks stay in the holes forever

I heard some intel on these econ benefits of war machine: apparently the gov stimulus was front-loaded with 90% of payments to companies to produce for military up front with 10% on contract completion: hence juiced economy early in war and no sustained boom.

Does he think that literally all military spending in Ukraine is going to buying weapons from the US and other NATO countries? That seems bizarre and out of touch with reality although I guess that fits with the rest of his essay. Also, what is a left-winger doing writing for Unheard?!?