Post

I wonder how much the Internet giving everybody access to instant and free porn of every variety imaginable has influenced our era of “no sex in movies please, we’re Hollywood.” Perhaps sex scenes in big movies were more marketable in the days when there was a far more restricted smut supply?

In other words, maybe US movie goers are more willing to tolerate or overlook sexless movies (thus making them easier to sell in China and other nations), since they can now see porn with basically zero friction

10 reposts276 likes

Ok but you can go read about Spider-Man with zero friction and that made a ton of money. There's a very puritanical stigma attached to sex, even more so now than there was in the 80s and 90s and it's not really cause of how "Frictionless" porn is. Which is basically meaningless as a thought.

* This also weirdly implies that we should actually be seeing *more* sex in films and not less cause of all the fascist porn bans happening across the country. But that's clearly not happening cause it isn't really about audience preferences nor how accessible porn is.

The other fascinating aspect of this is that romantasy BOOKS full of explicit sex are also selling like gangbusters to women at the same time as big movies have become largely sexless

I am fascinated by the claim that another reason big movies don’t really have sex in them anymore is because people find it more awkward than they used to to see sex scenes on the big screen in a theater or watching a movie with family. Idk if there’s any data on that though

And I mean I personally AM someone who doesn’t enjoy sex scenes in movies much but I do think they have a real place in art

I think mainstream entertainment ceding sex entirely to porn is bad bad bad. These grand narratives are how define social mores and societal norms. The arts are a vital place to interrogate that but now there’s this big hole where that discourse would be

I do of course think it’s also a very good thing that actors have much more leverage to turn down sex scenes now and that they’re handled much more ethically and thoughtfully

This rings true to me, because we‘re also still seeing popular TV shows with remarkably explicit and lengthy sex scenes (e.g. Bridgerton). But you can calibrate your privacy level for watching those, as you can with books, and you can pause or skip them at will. All things you can’t do at AMC.

this is so funny because i was literally just thinking about sex in movies and why im generally like... not always a fan, and this was basically my conclusion. if i want to see man butt i can do it on my own time much easier, and if i'm going to the theater i'm usually going with my family, sooo

Re not wanting to watch sex scenes with family: I'm in several online groups related to books, and I have noticed that people asking for audiobook recs for long car trips w/fam ask for no sex scenes. That's understandable to me (even though I inwardly laugh about their assumptions re grandma).

I've kinda wondered how much of sex scenes in the recent past were driven by Weinstein, either directly by his request that movies under his umbrella sex it up, or indirectly by directors and producers who wanted to impress the guy with so much power (or they just assumed it HAD to be that way).

There certainly is a difference in porn, if not in regular movies. Porn made by and for women is an entirely different thing because it centers female pleasure and doesn’t fall as deeply into the standard tropes.

Someone once explained it to me this way: Books are all niche, and romantasy telegraphs the explicit content on the label. Meanwhile, big movies are still social events, people ask you at work if you saw (insert big name movie here). Putting sex into movies you feel compelled to see feels abusive.

In my experience, people did talk about those shows, but dutifully avoided any discussion of *those* scenes in 'mixed company.' Then again, this feels like a very specifically White American PMC Millennial/Zoomer thing, strongly shaped by the zeitgeist during our formative years.

This has crossed my mind a lot lately — we’ve been revisiting some tv shows and movies from 90s/early-2000s … and it seems even more obvious now when some nudity or sex was wedged in to push an audience arousal button vs character/story