Post

I wonder how much the Internet giving everybody access to instant and free porn of every variety imaginable has influenced our era of “no sex in movies please, we’re Hollywood.” Perhaps sex scenes in big movies were more marketable in the days when there was a far more restricted smut supply?

49 reposts782 likes

My highly scientific wild ass guess is that a lot of the performative sex negativity online nowadays is a symptom of how pervasive monetized parasocial relationships with online softcore model types have become, even without full blown porn addiction

(as you note in the thread) it's a confluence of factors, but the biggest to me seems like China they need to sell the movies in restrictive markets, and it becomes a flattening i'm not sure why explicit violence is OK but sex is not (I have a few guesses)

This is extremely outdated and even for the time it wasn’t is an oversimplification. The biggest hurdle movies face in China is just that the government imports less and less these days. The ones getting in tend to be major franchises and all and those just haven’t had tons of sex anyway.

And/or this could be schismogenesis: the audiences who want to see sex have a better source, so Hollywood tries to latch on to an audience that they still hope might be captive? (Want to see sex *and* plot, character development, effects? Sorry - that's art....)

This makes more sense than anything. As kids, used to wake up in the middle of the night to watch scrambled Skinimax (Cinemax) broadcasts, and wo to the friend who actually subscribed; it was a whole THING. No need to do that anymore.

totally anecdotal: I think Wicker looks like a fun movie, but I can't imagine seeing it in the theater in this day and age for vague unease reasons that I think have to do with no guaranteed privacy in public spaces, maybe? it just feels like a risk as a teacher.

I had assumed it was just me, but I have a habit of skipping ahead during sex scenes because I found them boring and generally not important to the plot or character development. Maybe, our standards for good story telling have gone up?

Back in the 80s my teenage brother would watch whatever movie Showtime played at midnight since there was usually lots of nudity and sex. Seems quaint now.

By a lot of people's own admission it's mostly on response to being uncomfortable about watching HBO shows with their parents, which is a thing they do for some reason.

In other words, maybe US movie goers are more willing to tolerate or overlook sexless movies (thus making them easier to sell in China and other nations), since they can now see porn with basically zero friction

Ok but you can go read about Spider-Man with zero friction and that made a ton of money. There's a very puritanical stigma attached to sex, even more so now than there was in the 80s and 90s and it's not really cause of how "Frictionless" porn is. Which is basically meaningless as a thought.

* This also weirdly implies that we should actually be seeing *more* sex in films and not less cause of all the fascist porn bans happening across the country. But that's clearly not happening cause it isn't really about audience preferences nor how accessible porn is.

The other fascinating aspect of this is that romantasy BOOKS full of explicit sex are also selling like gangbusters to women at the same time as big movies have become largely sexless

I am fascinated by the claim that another reason big movies don’t really have sex in them anymore is because people find it more awkward than they used to to see sex scenes on the big screen in a theater or watching a movie with family. Idk if there’s any data on that though

And I mean I personally AM someone who doesn’t enjoy sex scenes in movies much but I do think they have a real place in art

This rings true to me, because we‘re also still seeing popular TV shows with remarkably explicit and lengthy sex scenes (e.g. Bridgerton). But you can calibrate your privacy level for watching those, as you can with books, and you can pause or skip them at will. All things you can’t do at AMC.

this is so funny because i was literally just thinking about sex in movies and why im generally like... not always a fan, and this was basically my conclusion. if i want to see man butt i can do it on my own time much easier, and if i'm going to the theater i'm usually going with my family, sooo

Re not wanting to watch sex scenes with family: I'm in several online groups related to books, and I have noticed that people asking for audiobook recs for long car trips w/fam ask for no sex scenes. That's understandable to me (even though I inwardly laugh about their assumptions re grandma).

I've kinda wondered how much of sex scenes in the recent past were driven by Weinstein, either directly by his request that movies under his umbrella sex it up, or indirectly by directors and producers who wanted to impress the guy with so much power (or they just assumed it HAD to be that way).

There certainly is a difference in porn, if not in regular movies. Porn made by and for women is an entirely different thing because it centers female pleasure and doesn’t fall as deeply into the standard tropes.

Someone once explained it to me this way: Books are all niche, and romantasy telegraphs the explicit content on the label. Meanwhile, big movies are still social events, people ask you at work if you saw (insert big name movie here). Putting sex into movies you feel compelled to see feels abusive.

This has crossed my mind a lot lately — we’ve been revisiting some tv shows and movies from 90s/early-2000s … and it seems even more obvious now when some nudity or sex was wedged in to push an audience arousal button vs character/story

Dunno if that would explain the collapse in scenes with obvious sexual chemistry but nothing overt actually happening. That's the stuff that's really glaring to me. The clooney/lopez sexual tension in out of sight for example, it's become as rare as hens teeth.

I think you’re on to something here, because I think it trained people to be like “sex on the screen is something I see by myself in a darkened room, and I perceive it to be some level of shameful” so they’re uncomfortable seeing it outside of that context

I did some modelling of film returns for a college math paper in like 2008, and ended up reading a sample of the literature there. The two findings that stuck with me: 1) directors are a lot more predictive than star power, 2) R movies were vastly over-produced compared to how lucrative PG-13 was.

Since then, it feels like you've seen the industry react to that with the Marvel era of PG-13 everything. Any R rating, much less one for sex instead of violence I think is now seen as a big gamble. And the expanding influence of the just-as-prudish international market only weighs on that.

How much of this is just a reflection of the fact that capeshit, even if it's losing steam, still rules Hollywood and that genre can't seem to do horny to save its life. Like One Battle After Another was just last year and horniness and psychosexuality cut a swathe across that plot.

All I can say is that it was extremely uncomfortable, years ago, to watch the first episode of "Game of Thrones" (sibling sex scene) with my 16 yr old son. There was a whole lot of mutually agreed fast forwarding happening. I can live without that stuff in my movies.

it could very well be that. I viewed it as kind of a pendulum swing away from what felt like directors adding sex scenes to meet a quota. the one on the front of my mind is the scene from Oppenheimer where kitty imagines him having sex in the middle of the security hearing

my pet theory as well bsky.app/profile/tyle...

the babahuck@tylerhuckabee.bsky.social

you hear discourse about it but idk if there’s any real data to back it up. my hypothesis is that gen z on down grew up in the online porn era where there’s nothing novel about seeing sex and nudity on screen, so the idea that sex and nudity on screen might serve an artistic purpose sounds ridic.

Maybe for franchises and some big directors. But for most films, the rights are sold at festivals when buyers can see the product and hear the buzz... There are lots of multi-country "co-productions" in Europe though.

I still think this whole thing is overblown, especially because it happens at a time when TV shows have tons of sex in it. It feels more to me like one person mad that the MCU isn't laser aimed at them in particular than anything.

That's definitely part of it. I wonder how much of the puritanism from the kids also has to do with the fact they're always watched/surveilled in public. They can watch smut on their own time without fear of being watched (as you've pointed out, with no friction), so why risk being seen doing it?

In my house, I joke about it as being generational. It was really important to boomers to see a physical manifestation of the fucking. I think there’s something to the point you made about internet smut. Those scenes also often focused on objectifying the actresses, who have more power now.

I think there's more going on because aside from sex scenes versus not, a subject on which I'm of a similar mind to baseball scenes versus not- does it belong in your story? If yes do it- But why the hell do actors have zero chemistry with each other, now? Acting like this is a board meeting.

Probably a much smaller part, but I wonder how much is actresses being less willing to be nude for unnecessary reasons? Here I'm thinking of Emilia Clarke renegotiating her nudity clause after S1 of GoT

I don’t follow wrestling discourse so apologies if this rehashes any giant flame wars but this was also my sense of what happened w/ the WWE's 'Attitude Era' having some level of near softcore regularly. As real porn became more accessible being more family friendly felt like a stronger strategy