Post

That’s because they’re gonna fuck everyone on mail in ballots

…until after the midterms.

So what? Project 2025 is still way underway.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvUL...

The Right to Privacy, which the Supreme Court in prior rulings agreed to, was the foundation for granting the legality to Interracial and Same Sex Marriages against the States who made that illegal. Clarence “Uncle” Thomas does not believe in the Right to Privacy.

THE FIGHT HAS TO CONTINUE BUT THOSE WHO ALREADY MARRIED CANNOT BE REVERSED - THATS FUCKING INSANE!!!

The Court didn’t reject the appeal out of principle, it was just a bad vehicle. Don’t mistake strategy for mercy. They will go after Obergefell next. Saying otherwise is like pretending they didn’t overturn Roe. Christians preach love while legislating hate.

The justices knew that if they overturned the rights of the LGBTQ community. Queers would be setting fire to American cities!

I love that Kim Davis is having a bad day. 💅🏻💅🏻

“It’s important to continue to make people aware of how important those family protections are for so many people,” said Jennifer Levi, a lawyer who worked on some of the nation’s first same-sex marriage cases... “We have certainly seen the court shift its position in other contexts.”

They refused to hear it. SCOTUS refuses to hear most cases, unless it is something from 47. This is all they have to do everytime 47 challenges 250 years of legal precedents. Instead of eroding the rule of law..

The SCROTUS is reading the tea leaves. They are done as trump's errand boys.

Cause JD Vance is pretty much out of the closet. Boy toy of Peter Theil.

This is terrible writing. This is not what the verb "to garner" means. You need a verb meaning "create" or "engender" E.g. the writing at Forbes is unlikely to garner any accolades for which no payment is made

At last, the court has done something right.

Exactly. I post often: I’m not a Constitutional Scholar, just a retired EMT, if I can see this, where the hell are all the people who ARE Constitutional Scholars and WTAF are they not screaming right now? So much culpability at so many levels. Breathtaking.

But they left the door open for future court cases on this action

Well, how many of you know that a key member of Trump's administration is in a "same-sex marriage"?

Jfc at least there's a bottom on this... finally.

Good.

Who?

exactly!

The problems will be if he, breaks convention & stays in power, or if his acolytes continue their purge. Slowly the democratic realities will slowly disappear, under the guise of 'it's needed & is good for the people'! Beware, what politicians do is never, for the benefit of the people!

Yes. This only means the Davis' case was asking the wrong question of law to overturn Obergefell. The need a case that is focused on equal protection, not a free exercise case.

I can breathe again...

If we can’t remove the criminal politicians, no hope of ever being able to unfuck America.

Critique of same sex marriage has always pointed out this is a wealthy white male issue, hence it gets traction. Abortion? Women? Nobody cares if those rights are taken away.

It can still happen in the future thats why we Democrat's in congress and senate

Just from a legal perspective, the Supreme Court had better NOT change the same-sex laws, especially because of contract law! Filing taxes? Hospital visitation rights? Etc etc It would be a mess.

This case in some form will definitely be back next term. Don’t forget, It’s on their little to do list

And #SCOTUS should rescind their decision on abortion. It's the same damn religious bullshit. We don't need #Religion telling us how to manage our own bodies, much the same as we don't need #KimDavis telling us who to marry. Religion: OUT OF MY GOVERNMENT!

Mhhhh. They must have seen the recent election results.

Thank goodness that they got one thing right...finally.

They were protecting Bessent & other rich gay donors, of which there are MANY.

Doesn’t he have a husband? Is his marriage going to be fine when SC overturns his marriage? Asking someone.

Get rekt, Kim Davies and republicans

So they're going to wait until after the midterms, then. This wouldn't have had the scope the Roberts court truly wants. It's frightening how few states have their own protections. And we know state "freedom" rights are just a prelude to federal enforcement.

👏👏👏

Clarence Thomas must be pissed to miss out on a chance to overturn gay marriage.

For some reason this reminds me of the mid '60s, when I would walk down the street smokin' a joint, when it was totally illegal. A friend did a 5-year stretch for 'possession' of one joint. The gears of justice grind slowly. Freedom is always worth fighting for; just ask a Gopper about 2A.

They declined to grant Cert as she filed her amicus brief late per court procedure They are attempting to use process as a fig leaf. If they blatantly accepted her thin case, the backlash would have been catastrophic They will certainly act on a new filing with a different applicant and approach

They will. They still got 3 more big beautiful years to come. So chill and enjoy.

Finally a sensible decision by SCOTUS

That would be close to the last straw. Republican would be amazed how that would throw their election hopes down the toilet.

So much democracy. Just too much. When settled, it’s not even settled. There is no consistency but chaos.

Marriage was defined by God … NOT man. God made marriage to be between a man and a woman. Anything else should be considered a ‘civil union with benefits’.

For now. They are probably just waiting for a stronger argument and a time when heat is off Trump's shutdown.

They should have done the same regarding ABORTION...

Abort the court. National democracy highest court. Mail in ballots only.

Kim Davis has too much time on her hands

Plus, outlawing same-sex marriage would have forced people back to living sham lives, like they did in the 1940s and 1950s.

bsky.app/profile/loud...

Tax the rich!

Too bad they wouldn't reconsider Roe v. Wade! They should have left it alone! 🤬

liquidate the scotus before they try again

The fact that repealing gay marriage was a mere consideration in the Supreme Court should alarm anyone even they're a of naïve centrist. What's to stop this from being an actual occurrence in America or set a similar trend across the world?

But what about Roe v Wade, #SCOTUS? #NotGoingBack

And yet they acted in roe v wade…like dump, don’t trust em any further than you can throw them

What a relief!

Another distraction finished. NOW, RELEASE THE UN-REDACTED EPSTEIN FILES !!

The admin is trying to initiate the project 2025 that "isn't real". They told us all of this was in the works.

Thank goodness some great news today!!

Big blow to the fake Christian MAGA party.

Bummer

Once in a while, they do smthng right.

They’re going to do it but they need a case with standing, and Davis had none in this case. It’s a reprieve for now.

Excellent news. Now to ensure that they *never* overturn that precedent!

"His husband" is an oxymoron. So is "her wife." Their day is soon to come when they will face the wrath of God, and it will be terrifying.

We got lucky this time. But we cannot trust SCOTUS to do the right thing every time. This is why we need to replace SCOTUS given rights, with actual laws passed by Congress. As soon as Dems control the House and Senate, they need to pass laws to keep what we have.

Suck a dick Kim Davis

Not that I wish for it to be overturned but I was surprised it was ever agreed to in the first place. To me marriage is between a man and a woman. That’s what most people understood, until the court changed the definition

Yet another thing for the Orange Menace to bitch about. Too bad it can't be the thing that finally drags him out of the closet....

If you can't respect another human beings bodily autonomy and right to live and be free of hate, then you're the problem, I'm afraid.

Thomas won't touch it because of the hypocrisy. His own marriage would then come under scrutiny. Loving v. Virginia was a basis for the same sex ruling..

They are waiting for a better excuse to remove more rights. The fact that they were even debating it should be a sign.

That’s a good thing

Particularly pleasing that the Court declined even to give the case a hearing. Dismissed out of hand.

YET

I still have this & I will never get rid of it.

People's existence should not be up to debate. Who are they to dictate the rights of others?

It never had a hope in hell of being taken up by SCOTUS, as much as Thomas and Alito may have wanted to rule on it.

WILL NOT BE HEARD THIS SESSION....to be continued.

👏👏👏👏

Suck it MAGA

Also economically it would be a cluster muffin!

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Hold on did I read that right? Is this good news? I can’t recognize it anymore

Yeah but... I can't help fearing the other shoe that drops. Trump is after all this Supreme Court's president.

When the poster child for the petition is a three time hetero marriage loser like Kim Davis, it was a fait accompli. Lol.

I was sure they would since 6of9 our pro25, glad they didn't I know far to many loving couples that don't deserve to be judged by any one, needless to say those that want to that us back to an authoritarian regime

It is only a matter of time for the Christo-fascist majority on the court.

The Supreme Court should NOT be overturning any historic nation changing cases, just like trump shouldn’t be allowed to use presidential orders to overturn historic laws of equality

I feel somewhat safe since Kavanaugh was handpicked by Kennedy and Kennedy considers that ruling a crowning achievement. Don’t think Kavanaugh would overturn while Kennedy is alive at least. Roberts also seems against overturning any decision his court made because it makes him look insanely bad.

I’m sure Thomas and Ali to are telling activist what they need to do.1

@scotusgate.bsky.social; @scotusgate.bsky.social; @SCOTUS; @civilrightsorg.bsky.social; That "ONE" f/your circles convinced FEDERAL COURT in NORFOLK VA to dismiss "CIVIL SUITE" against HRT for bus incident that caused ME TRAUMA yo my FRONTAL.

I mean given that its the exact same legal justification they had for allowing private companies to discriminate against gay customers, maybe we’ll be ok

This is it.

Something else is coming down the pike, you can bet on it!!

👏👏👏👏👏👏

The widespread fears were unjustified. A lot of people ask the Court to hear their cases. Few of them succeed. And as bad as the Roberts Court is (it’s awful), I can’t imagine anyone who would want to use a bigoted moron like Kim Davis to establish a precedent for anything.

Wow. A petition. That’s so more effective than voting 

👍❤️👍❤️

So essentially what is happening is what SHOULD be happening, people should be able to decide for themselves. Seems like a pretty Republican idea.

For now…..

For now. They are waiting for a better case.

Look if marriage was purely a religious thing and had no effect on anything legal Sure let the Christians have it They still wouldn't be good christians But still But as we all know that isn't the case

Whoever gets into office next needs to get rid of all those traitorous justices they clearly don't respect the law like they're supposed to

This is the way Roe vs Wade should have been approached!

No way same sex marriage is going to be overturned!

"Supreme Court won't consider overturning same sex marriage, yet" There. I fixed your headline for you. Kim Davis isn't the poster child they want for this one. They will wait for someone more likeable.

this is an isolated piece though? it literally covers one topic and doesn't stray from it; ope nevermind it's being updated live from what i can seem but still, it's not about discussing the issue via a party-lens and sides it's about discussing the rejection of the petition (and with 1/2

There is another case before the court that could be worse.

Same sex marriage will not be overturned. The right is not as far right on these issues as they use to be. It’s commonly and respectfully accepted that two individuals of the same sex can get married. Now when it comes transgenderism and how it affects kids…that’s a different story.