Post

If this is accurate, WeTransfer is unusable for professional creative work. Would violate most work-for-hire contracts to share copyrighted material with a third party like this.

Rami Ismail (رامي)@ramiismail.com

Bye forever, WeTransfer.

1.2K reposts2.5K likes

Yes, I've seen this. It's good at covering "normal" TOS boilerplate. But the WeTransfer changes go beyond "normal" in multiple places, IMHO.

And obviously, you'd never want to give up the rights to your own creator-owned work to a fucking file transfer service like this.

Hoping Dropbox is still cool! If not, I guess the FTP service associated with my website is gonna get a workout for the first time in a decade or so!

I've been starting the process of off-lining all of my work for the last few months. Setting up something like Unraid to store all your data is fairly easy, then from there you can just give people direct download links that don't have to go through a 3rd party.

Relatedly, did I mention I'm an "A.i." abolitionist? Because I'm an "A.i." abolitionist. bsky.app/profile/greg...

Greg Pak@gregpak.net

I'm an "A.i." abolitionist. No consumer-facing LLMs or generative "A.i." in anything. Sure, machine learning in science and a few other limited applications is fine. But consumer-facing LLMs and generative "A.i." that are based on theft, push disinfo, and can be manipulated by billionaires? No.

It's insanity. A lot of big clients already don't allow WeTransfer, but still lots have sent me strat docs when I've been doing FL work on a ton of occcassions as a 'work around'. Am I missing something or they gonna tell companies like Disney, Samsung, or Unilever that this stuff is theirs now?

Limited to my experience in marketing, but every big corporation has a set of rules around file transfer that generally are a nightmare for massive files like rough cuts of film that need fast approval. EVERY client I've ever had used some sort of workaround at some point.