Post

The "justification" story is unravelling. www.cnn.com/2025/12/05/p...

It's a cover-up

They kind of backed themselves into a corner after the first unsuccessful strike. If they survived 40 minutes, there became a chance that they might survive longer - long enough to tell a story they'd not like anyone to know.

They were waiting for them to just die and when they didn't die they killed them.

Agree, though it's not a double tap by either definition

i don't think anyone should be given the benefit of the doubt that they were against it and dithered. it's the end of 2025 and anyone that deeply involved knew what was happening

I mean, that seems neither here nor there because they've been broadcasting this stuff gleefully anyway

sure seems that way

Didn’t Hegseth say he was there watching it live?

I wonder if They were waiting to see if they eventually die, and on the first chance of survival -

That's the same way the US uses it in the context of every President since George W. Bush. People acting as if this reprehensible and atrocious war crime is new are being very selective in their outrage.

Gave it 30 minutes with no show of rescue so ordered the Double Tap. International legal bodies view deliberate use of the double-tap to target rescuers a serious violation because - Willful Killing/Targeting of Civilians Failure to Distinguish Attacking Protected Personnel Denial of Quarter

I would need about 0.1 seconds: Oh, somebody is still alive, who is close enough to provide assistance? Not hard, is it? Of course I wouldn't have been in the room anyway. I have no aspirations to visit The Hague.

41 minutes of hi-def video also completely disproves their “fog of war” justification