Post

Damn, if only schools had specific rules about bringing a camera on to school property and filming people without their consent! Then they could DO something about it!

But don't you see, it's the responsibility of the school to stop the awful shit from happening when meta actively creates situations where the awful shit will happen.

Certainly, and it's not like schools haven't been quick to ban other types of faddish items! Back when I was in high school I remember a couple years when administrators became obsessed with stamping out the twin scourges of hacky sacks and tamogotchi

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't it seem unusual that a half-dozen little creeps in your classroom - who had NEVER worn any sort of vision aid - suddenly turn up in uber-geek glasses? Couldn't that be the start of banning, at least on school grounds. Won't help anywhere else though.

Seriously the use case for "recording you in public without you knowing I'm recording you" has very few scenarios and none of them are good. Else you can just hold a camera. Like your phone.

It's illegal in two-party consent states. CA, FL, IL, MD, MA, MO, NH, PA, WA, DE, OR. E.g., www.recordinglaw.com/united-state... It's pretty easy to prove a violation if the video was posted online. Some states require you to establish damages, but for example in CA it's a $5K violation.

recordinglaw.comUS Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States ExplainedOur 51-jurisdiction guide maps every US state's recording consent rule, statute, and penalties, including the 12 states that require all-party consent.

eh. the deeper idea was "CCTV mounted to every head" but i guess "you can perv better than with a phone" is the seductive hook.

Suckerberg: -announce perv-specs -has them build -recieve massive blowback and concerns -gets warned that perv-specs will be used for perv-things -releases them anyways -gets confused when perv-people use perv-specs to do perv-shit Classic brainless billionaire shit! A1 quality grade shit indeed!