Post

The legal arguments for Trump's birthright citizenship executive order are vapid and embarrassing. Multiple lower court judges legit laughed DOJ lawyers out of the room. The fact that four Supreme Court justices twisted themselves into logical pretzels to buy it is a constitutional emergency.

ballsandstrikes.orgThe Constitution Is On Life SupportFour justices are prepared to stuff the Fourteenth Amendment’s promises in the garbage because Mister Trump demands it.

1K reposts3.8K likes

If I’m reading your piece correctly, you’re saying they’re motivated by wanting to please Trump. I think it’s even worse than that: They’re in agreement with his racism, and think Reconstruction was a mistake that they’re eager to erase.

Constitutional emergency indeed given Kavanaugh’s response, which basically provides Congress with the specs for the bill that would flip him to the other side.

the 5-4, with Barret saying it was a "narrow ruling" only applicable to that case, means they want to flip it, just not yet. probably want to wait until after the election and strike it in the shadow docket. They couldn't use shadow docket this time. this was a "try again in texas" verdict

Samuel L. Jackson played the 'Most Hated Negro in Cinematic History’ when he played Stephen in Django. Judge Thomas is the “Most hated black man in Judicial History.” He would overturn progress to send us back to the fields!

The days of thinking the Supreme Court made decisions based on interpretation of law are long since past. This is clearly a racist, political body that is fine ending the 250 year democracy experiment in favor of a new Fascist Emperor model.

Two Justices pretty much did the pretzel twisting back in 1898. Were you having a constitutional emergency in 1898? Or, is 2 of 9 an acceptable/non-emergency amount of pretzel twisting? If no emergency in 1898 and 2 of 9 is OK, what's the threshold for GQ? 3 of 9 or 4 of 9?

So, you see, it’s this way. I’m an originalist except when I’m not. We must take the words for their clear meaning at the time they’re written except where I might find some way to construe them in a way that contradicts their original meaning for my “original” purposes. See how original this is?

We know the installed right wing of SCOTUS is corrupt and taking bribes for their decisions on top of being horrible people. Kavanaugh and Thomas were both credibly accused of sexual harassment & abuse. Roberts & his wife have taken in over 10 million. We know this.

I think people are misunderstanding the possible implications of Gorsuch’s opinion. The usual logical endpoint of his domicile=citizenship is that states have unceded power to confer citizenship on anyone domiciled there. It is the other side of his transients were excluded from citizenship.

This: "The upshot of Barbara is that, as a country, we are but one MAGA dead-ender away from a Court that is willing (and maybe excited) to undo Reconstruction, just as soon as Republican politicians bring a case that will allow them to do it."

Over the past several decades, we've been warned in panic mode about the dreaded "Constitutional Crisis" ... something to fear and to avoid at all costs. But. Over the past period of trump/maga, we've been drowning in Constitutional Crisis's every single day.