Post

Which translation did you read? I read the Scott Moncrieff version in my 20s and adored it, but I remember reading about a Penguin edition with each book translated by someone different, I think about 15-20ish years ago, that got some good reviews and I've been wondering about re-reading it.

I did S-M for volume 1 but disliked it, then Oxford for 2 but no later vols had then be published, and Penguin for 3-7, variable quality

I will need to read your piece ofc, but I was totally bored w it and its hopelessly frustrating main character. It gets semi-interesting from Vol 8 onwards (in Finland it was published in 10 volumes), but not enough to save it.

Some bits are certainly less interesting but there were plenty of scenes and thoughts which made up for it. Also I didn’t mind the narrator — frustrating was interesting

It can be so entertaining. I’ve only read the first, years ago, but I still sometimes think of his aunts’ endearing ridiculousness.

There was a site called Infinite Summer, which was an online reading group for those wanting to read Infinite Jest. It suggested reading 70 pages per week and it worked really well.

Bravo for your persistence and account of it. La Recherche is a fascinating journey, not at all pretentious as sometimes feared , it is deeply human hence its relevance till now. I am very interested by the AI take on it and will check Katherine Elkins writings. Merci!

Do it! But (presuming in translation) definitely go for the Prendergast edition. Much more readable than others, though you still have to settle into a slightly different mode of reading, and get used to the idea that a sentence you begin at the top of the page may not finish until the middle.

A genuinely life changing book. Alongside the insight into identity and psychology, there is an enormous amount of experimental, trickery, half-hidden allusions, word-play and even hints of significant alternative narratives that are unseen by the fallible narrator. It’s just stunning.

I just tried getting a small book club to read Jon Fosse’s Septology. They ran me out of the room after they realised it was a 900 page single sentence. May need to find a new bunch for Proust.

This is why we need to repeat the book group. I’ve been reading Moncrieff because it was free on Kindle and I wasn’t sure how much I wanted to commit. Well, I’m committed. Need to try a different translation next time.

Also loved your piece. A young fellow of my acquaintance is hugely enjoying Scott-M, having tried others… in revised Everyman’s lib edition. When I was teaching, used to discuss translation, impossibility thereof, with different opening pars of Proust.

Thanks. Also yr account of the complex inversions of Charlus’s emotions reminds me of McGrath’s The Grotesque. A man loves his butler, but cannot acknowledge it, so switches it: he hates the butler. But this too is unacceptable, so he reverses it again and believes his butler hates *him*. Delicious.