Post

One of the most salient divisions in American urban politics is between people who choose to live in cities because they actually like urban life and temporarily embarrassed suburbanites.

Sam@samd.bsky.social

Lmfao now a *republican* city councilmember is in my replies defending Kayla (a Democrat) for being a NIMBY the biggest dividing line in NYC is not Democrat vs Republican but it’s people who like New York vs. outer borough chuds who wished they lived in the Dallas suburbs

31 reposts247 likes

I could and have taken SEPTA to my job in strawberry mansion but it’s a 20 min drive vs. 90 on 3 buses. I’m usually driving around different locations in Philly but when I’m staying in one place and it’s only one bus I take it. Sucks when it doesn’t show up, and when it’s too crowded to sit.

TBH if I lived in New York I would probably be on City Island or in Jamaica. Walkable, medium density areas with good transit but not in the skyscraper part of the city proper

I’d like to add Chicago to this list. I live in one of the most high demand neighborhoods in the city and there is a long line of people wanting to move here. I think it’s time to tell those that want to drive everywhere to pick a suburb to move to. Urban areas should return to their prewar density

Right. Also, Chicago (plus DC, Philly, NYC) also have transit-oriented suburbs, so people who want some urban amenities/access but still to drive a lot have that choice. (Such suburbs don't exist outside most U.S. cities, but they do in these!)

District elections are bad because most cities' area is sprawl being governed only by people who hate the city part of the city and think of it as a weird office park with a performing arts center and street people (and a tax revenue pinata) is humiliating

I genuinely do not understand people who want to drive everywhere and park for free at their destination but insist on living in San Francisco, New York, Boston, Philadelphia, and Washington DC. The other 99.5% of the country has what you want with much lower housing prices. Move there!

A non-cynical answer I hear a lot is that a lot of people would rather live in car-centric suburbs but the suburbs often lack the liberal politics, laissez-faire attitudes, and job opportunities of cities.

and especially in the context of west side san francisco, where self-identified progressives have convinced themselves that doing conservative things—like promoting car culture, tearing out bike lanes, defunding public transit, and idealizing suburbia—is progressivism as long as they do it Wokely

Yep. I love my single family home and not paying for parking. Although, in South FL, most yards are way too big and parking lots are often bigger than they need to be too. Wouldn't mind seeing suburban neighborhoods rezoned so small businesses and 5-story housing are mixed into our neighborhoods.

A classic case of chuds not understanding what makes their lives good. They imagine cities as playgrounds and amusement parks, not places people live. The other 99% of the country is boring, but they don't understand that it's boring because it has what they want.

The places you mention all have great lifestyle amenities: arts organizations, libraries, book stores, fine dining, niche retail, etc. When I first moved to Austin, I was legit shocked at how bad the food was here. It's gotten better but if I had money to burn, I'd enjoy burning it in SF way more.

Years ago I remember a marketing video from a town in…Arkansas I think?…that was entirely about how much free surface parking they had downtown. A perfect haven for free and abundant parking freaks!