I love these because they’re reminders that the first couple of years of my career crammed a decade into them. Then I went and chose a fresh challenge: labor organizing (with software on the side)
The vibes are off everywhere these days and bullies are emboldened and ascendant. Opposing that kind of behavior is the right thing to do, and that’s enough of a reason to do it. That said let me try to argue that siding with bullies is an obviously idiotic business decision.
I'm curious about the idea of slack in the system. Can you quantify or add more detail about how hard people are pushing in high performance scenarios?
"20% time" might have bad branding with other teams, e.g. the original Google thing may have been conflated with the idea of engineers shipping features or whole products on their own. I have occasionally called it "19% time" to drop the hint that this is not that.
You also want to make an intentional choice about what percentage of the whole team is devoted to tool sharpening, paying down debts, etc. In the really hellish rebuilding years I alluded to in the talk we were doing 60% progress on product work, 40% trying to get ahead of the scaling curve.
Hey Dan, just wanted to say thanks for posting this -- extremely useful and timely. Like Tim, I'm now at an organization which is definitely *not* engineering driven but the takeaways from the talk seem equally (if not more) applicable here. Empathy and compassion is the way.
How much of the "feel-good programs" do you think is ZIRP? I moved from years of consumer web products to The Enterprise at the end of the ZIRP days, and things like boot camps, hack weeks, skill shares, embeds are less common now. I don't know if it's the company, industry, or just a new era.
I think a lot of current leaders thought they were doing these things as a cost-heavy retention strategy in a tough hiring market. So they’ve killed them all now that it’s harder to quit. But this is ahistorical, we started doing this as efficiency measure back when raising money was impossible!
Thank you, really liked the talk!
And while this is ultimately totally irrelevant to the argument being made, I'm wondering whether there might be typo ("+" instead of "*") in the Kingman's Formula spreadsheet.