Post
The U.S. is not a member of the ICC, but the court can still prosecute individuals for actions carried out on the territory of ICC member nations.
528 reposts1.6K likes
@zanaoblas.bsky.social @aliadair22.bsky.social The US isn’t an ICC member, but its people can still be charged for crimes on member soil. So what should Washington’s approach to the court actually be? 👇
What should the US do about the ICC? 1️⃣ Fully cooperate, even if officials are charged 2️⃣ Cooperate, but with strict limits 3️⃣ Refuse cooperation & use sanctions/pressure 4️⃣ Too soon / need more facts Vote below! No register needed 📊
Headline should be: Convicted Felon Blackmailing Prosecutors bsky.app/profile/did:...
Convicted felon blackmailing court to avoid prosecution That should be the banner headline on @nytimes.com front page and other paper of record across the country. The SCOTUS Six have given Trump free license for a reign of terror, now he wants same from the ICC. www.dailykos.com/stories/2025...
And now you understand why those billionaire clowns got a militairy rank. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America...
Here from two months ago. Littl' Marco and Hegseth are watch... www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOPZ...
@reuters.com CORRECTION “There is growing concern…that in 2029 the ICC will turn its attention to the president, to the vice president, to the secretary of DEFENSE and others, and pursue prosecutions against them.” It’s Secretary of Defense NOT Secretary of war. Secretary of war is a made up title.