Post

When historians describe what “quiet quitting” energy was, this is it

Because...... why be regular stupid?

(f)elon is actually more normative than djt in this regard. almost no one talks about themselves in the third person that would provide hits for those search terms.

One can only hope so

Maybe they should have searched by "Asshole".

ChatGPT, how do I human?

🐃💩 🐃💩 🐃💩

Yeah, that's a pretty good summary. But did they just 'doge' the real question?

If a nin-govt attorney didn this, there should surely be severe sanctions.

Do they really expect us to believe these results?

I checked and no, this was not dated April 1.

In case anyone want to call Elon Musk on his cell phone, here he is emailing his cell number to Jeffrey Epstein on Sept 11, 2013... $TSLA $TSLAQ #SPACEX ##XAI

Well this is what you get...

Lol

A working number with too many area codes.

The removal of family attachments from their review is another level of ridiculous here too. Basically, you could have an email saying, "attached is a screen shot showing Elon Musk's cell phone number," and their review would have included the email but not the attachment with the actual number.

Rumors circulating in Boca Chica, Texas, suggest SpaceX engineers are very unhappy with the boss. No one will be unhappy to see him go.

Surely someone working for the government called him on their official government phone, so there would be a record of Mr. Musk's phone number in that device. Surely they got his contact information when he was hired on as a Special Government Employee. That would have included a phone number.

Looks like it. Tricksey little devils, aren't they.

Looks like someone deliberately hacked the search terms to avoid any hits. Besides not searching just for his actual number(s), they also neglected to search for his initials, "E", "M", "EM", "E.M.", "ERM", or "E.R.M.". That's the way messages from frequent contacts are noted in the real world.

The felon’s “technologies policies” *snickers*

I didn’t say what it *was*, I wrote what it was *for*. Don’t put words in someone else’s mouth.

It would be delicious irony, however, if one of the Techbros gets caught out by a search string developed or search conducted by Ai!

omg 😂

*wow* That's a .... creative ... literal interpretation of the Judge's order pretty much guaranteed to produce a nonviable answer. I'm going to go out on a limb here and predict the judicial response is going to be nonfavorable.

B-b-b-b, B-b-b-b Baby! Don’t forget Musk’s number!

Idgits.

💯

Omg… thank you for clarifying that. It’s stupidity like the NYT today — not knowing what the acronym NATO means.

Judges need to be able to react to what is painfully obvious to all of us with a functioning analyzer; this regime is corrupt, unlawful, dishonest and morally bankrupt. Judges need to understand the contempt that this administration has for the co-equal Judiciary and repay them with equal contempt.

Im not sure even Jesus could have cured that kind of lame.

The normal response here would surely be to search for Elon's actual number (with optional whitespace inbetween digits) since theu must know what his number is.

Would they have access to his Signal messages? Wasn’t avoiding FOIA sort of the point of using Signal?

I don’t know how much they’ll unearth, but I can tell you that GAO is auditing every agency’s work done with DOGE, to include names, dates, and pay for every DOGE employee. So they won’t be able to hide once a new administration goes after them.

Did they search for Kekius Maximus, The Dogefather, or Harry Bolz?

Ffs

They should have used regex to search documents or wildcards with SQL in databases in case strings used abbreviations or nonstandard formats, e.g. 777.555.1212, 7775551212, ph:, cel:.

😂😂😂

Allison have a great Easter same to your cats which mine always listens intently to the Daily Beans podcast and she loves Sundays with Unjustified.