Post

Bollocks. One, hardcovers are selling great, especially the ones that these days come with sprayed edges and illustrated end pages. Two, ditching hardcovers would absolutely gut author and bookseller incomes. You want to fuck up publishing? Kill the hardcover. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

theguardian.comThe hill I will die on: Heavy, awkward and incredibly expensive – we don’t need hardback books | Larry RyanIt’s an annoying choice: either lug around a heavy tome or try to remember when the paperback version is coming out, says freelance writer Larry Ryan

(PS: want to read the book before the paperback release but don't want to pay for the hardcover? That's what your local library is for! Which, by the way, usually prefers hardcover because they're more durable and stand up to repeated lending. Support your loyal library!)

103 reposts1.3K likes

Thank you for highlighting this aspect. Hardcovers are absolutely critical for libraries' collections--and, they are BY FAR the most efficient for taxpayers. They last, and they don't need to be re-licensed like ebooks.

I often buy a hardback copy, read it, then donate it to the library to shelve for other patrons. I do this for the biggies that I want to read & I know others want, too.

I buy hardcover for my personal library and paperbacks for travel. And my local Jefferson County Colorado Public Library is excellent - if they don't have a book you can request it and they'll either buy it or do an interlibrary loan.

Also, some folks (like me) buy hardcover copies of books I know I want to keep (even if I have the e-book version), as I anticipate that, at some point, e-book retailers will say "we only sold you a license, and we're revoking that now, per our TOS."

My local library had to by extra e-books, as well as the hardcovers, because when I first got on the list, it was 8 weeks long! I have arthritis & can't hold physical books for long, but I do buy the occasional hardcover for my bookshelf. Everyone needs to know what great taste I have!