Post

Bollocks. One, hardcovers are selling great, especially the ones that these days come with sprayed edges and illustrated end pages. Two, ditching hardcovers would absolutely gut author and bookseller incomes. You want to fuck up publishing? Kill the hardcover. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

theguardian.comThe hill I will die on: Heavy, awkward and incredibly expensive – we don’t need hardback books | Larry RyanIt’s an annoying choice: either lug around a heavy tome or try to remember when the paperback version is coming out, says freelance writer Larry Ryan

411 reposts3K likes

(PS: want to read the book before the paperback release but don't want to pay for the hardcover? That's what your local library is for! Which, by the way, usually prefers hardcover because they're more durable and stand up to repeated lending. Support your loyal library!)

Thank you for highlighting this aspect. Hardcovers are absolutely critical for libraries' collections--and, they are BY FAR the most efficient for taxpayers. They last, and they don't need to be re-licensed like ebooks.

I often buy a hardback copy, read it, then donate it to the library to shelve for other patrons. I do this for the biggies that I want to read & I know others want, too.

I buy hardcover for my personal library and paperbacks for travel. And my local Jefferson County Colorado Public Library is excellent - if they don't have a book you can request it and they'll either buy it or do an interlibrary loan.

Also, some folks (like me) buy hardcover copies of books I know I want to keep (even if I have the e-book version), as I anticipate that, at some point, e-book retailers will say "we only sold you a license, and we're revoking that now, per our TOS."

My local library had to by extra e-books, as well as the hardcovers, because when I first got on the list, it was 8 weeks long! I have arthritis & can't hold physical books for long, but I do buy the occasional hardcover for my bookshelf. Everyone needs to know what great taste I have!

Hard cover books are like vinyl records, IMO. The media could be delivered in a cheaper, smaller format; but the work often deserves something more tangible and physical.

I love hardcover books and they’re my first choice when buying. Nothing wrong with the other formats. I have a Kobo and I like it well enough, but I feel like in in this day and age everything has to be charged and connected to the internet somehow. Let me have my physical books.

Either way, books made of paper will go the way of the DVD (with the proliferation of digital media). Barnes and Noble will be the new Blockbuster Video. You don’t have to like it, but it’s a moving train. Resist and ignore it at your own expense.

Also, do we not care about longevity? Hardcover books last longer and can stand up to rougher treatment than paperbacks, sometimes extremely so. Some paperbacks are so cheaply made that you can scratch the ink off the spine with a fingernail 😬

All this plus, I mean, aren't they eliminating paperbacks? you get rid of hardbacks too, and what's left, other than ebooks? which have their place, I like that format too, but please, get real.

Libraries buy hardcovers, & so do the strange people who prefer hardcovers, but the real question is, what % of the hardcover sales are only because a paperback doesn’t exist yet? (I can count on one hand the number of times I’ve bought a hardcover because I wanted the hardcover specifically.)

I have nightmares where all books are like those cheap paperbacks from the 80s where the spine literally snaps and pages fall out of the middle. A well-bound hardback will last for centuries so our descendents can read them as they rebuild civilization after all our crap.

I **love** hardcover books. If I read a paperback book and it was fantastic, I'll find it in hardcover and loan/give/donate the paperback.

Hardcover makes everything better. Opening the book for the first time, cup of tea (or glass of sherry) at hand, the feel of turning the page … ahhh.

"selling great, especially the ones that these days come with sprayed edges and illustrated end pages." I see those increasingly showing up in my local library. Since I doubt the library thinks it is worth paying a premium for them I presume they are being unloaded.

Hardcovers are also usually larger print with more spacing between lines, so as a dyslexic person I find them much easier to read. I prefer ebooks over paperbacks in most situations because you can adjust the font.

The people who actually listen to morons like this are the ones re-buying their record and CD collections in 2026 after being told how dumb they were for keeping them twenty years ago, and believing it

Exactly. People are now also buying old DVDs at tag sales. Paying to watch old movies on Netflix with commercials is crazy.

We've ripped our whole collection for ease of access and transport, but we still have every CD. They're just in a box at the bottom of the closet. And we buy more at garage sales, friends of the library sales, thrift stores, used books and music shops, etc. Same with Blu-Rays.

The thing I hate the most about this is the “I don’t personally like this choice, for which there are several other options I can choose instead, so we should eliminate that choice so no one else can have it!”

My 11th book came out in September, luxury hardback, delightfully tactile cover (beautiful maps on the end papers!), highest priced of my books yet, by quite a bit. Selling like crazy, and I'm making some good money. Hardbacks forever!

I only buy hardcover or ebook unless the title is only selling in paperback. When I last moved, I had to “dispose” of all my paperbacks due to deterioration. Slowly replacing some.

Before my father died, he was on a quest to replace every paperback book in his collection with a hard cover edition. He befriended a local used bookstore owner to help him track down the out-of-print titles. I inherited his books, and the hardcovers still look great! The paperbacks not so much. 😬

Plus paperbacks are a nightmare for libraries (be they public or classroom) because they get destroyed in backpacks, etc. I ONLY buy hardcover books for classroom use, even if it means buying fewer copies for that reason.

I do like a hardback for the shelf, although most are now stored in the loft until I get my finger out and sort out my study to display them all properly!

hardbacks are very rare in Australia. Our first-release format is the C-format trade paperback, which costs about A$32-35. Only a few very successful books get a second edition as B-format paperbacks.

I typically only buy hardcover books if I'm planning to get it signed. A couple years ago I got a hardcover copy of The Hobbit for the express purpose of getting it signed by Andy Serkis (had it made out to my son, Samwise). I recently got a 1-volume copy of LotR and will be getting it signed soon.

Yeah, this is one article that I really don't need to read. The headline is already stupid enough to get the gist of it. Hardcovers are the obvious choice for a book, what the hell is the article author smoking?

I'm taking the article as a failed attempt at satire aimed at people who are upset at being even slightly inconvenienced--of whom there are far, far too many.

I can solve his problem. Just have multiple books on the go at once. Hardbacks for at home, and paperbacks or an e-reader for travel, and audiobooks for driving and chores. I usually have 3-4 books going at once.

Hardcovers are durable. For libraries, for books you want to keep in your own collection, hardcovers are the way to go. It's like dishtowels vs. paper towels -- one gets used again and again, the other is disposable. (I know paperbacks do get passed around, but the idea remains.)

"Let's get rid of this thing that's been around for hundreds of years, because I think it's out-of-date. It's not possible for me to live and let live." I'm so tired of wannabe disrupters. No, I don't even want to read the article. He doesn't want a hardcover book, then he doesn't have to buy one.

At this point in my life, I want my bookshelves to look nice. So, I generally buy hardcovers for new books (or authors I really love and want to display). I’m attempting to amass all Stephen King books in HC (no mean feat). If it’s something I want to read and own, I get it in ebook or audio.

I gotta be honest I don’t understand modern business rationale around multiple book formats. That said unless it’s an art book, I buy everything digitally now, so it’s not like I care on a personal level. Idle curiosity only.

What’d you do, search all of Bluesky for “ebook” because you had that one loaded in the chamber and you wanted to squeeze some greasy word diarrhea out? Maybe you can use your physical book’s pages to wipe your mouth, because you sure ain’t READING AND COMPREHENDING ANY WORDS WRITTEN ON THEM!

I absolutely seek out hardcovers if/when I can, both because I like how they look better and they are more sturdy than a paperback and especially a mass-market paperback.

This is like that one about never washing the bread knife or countless others. The Guardian must put in its opinion writers' contracts a clause requiring one eccentric bad take every quarter just to prove they are a British paper.

I disagree with Larry. Its name should tell you something, like it is full of shit. Is it a little weakling? It can’t hold a hardback. Must be maga. Hope he gets help, maybe join a gym and build some muscle.

And for what it's worth...I think climate change will drive a future in which technology is phased out and humans are forced to live as we did several hundred years ago. Which means we'll need to be able to publish printed books, both hardcover and softcover. No more e-books or Kindles.

I either buy hardcovers, or I buy paperbacks, and if it's something I want to keep on my shelf, I buy the hardback and donate the paperback to the library!

The individual who wrote that clearly does not ‘love’ books. I collect as much as read, often have a hard cover copy and a well read paperback. Most of my photography/graphic novels are hard cover as standard. I’m careful with them. They’ve travelled well with me. And I love them all dearly.

ftfa: "Thomas Pynchon’s novel Against the Day: that sucker is 1,085 pages long – it felt as if I was lugging a small child around for weeks" this guy hates Pynchon and is taking it out on the rest of us

Hardcovers are always to be preferred. Nothing in history will replace the feel of a good book or the act of reading it on a sunny afternoon. Getting ready to do my umpteenth reading of the Lord of the Rings. You can't do that properly with a paperback. Yuck.

In my parisian neighborhood the only charity shop that sells books in English won’t accept hardcovers, they don’t sell well. Residents there prefer something they can carry around all day in their backs- just like I do. Even with authors I love, I try my best to wait for the paperback to come out.

The book in the picture has been heavily abused, btw... the oversewn spine has been broken, the headband has torn loose, and just the position in which it was placed to photograph is wrong, wrong, wrong. If that's how you treat your books, please DO stick with "Perfect®" bound paperbacks.

I've actually moved to buying hardcovers instead of paperbacks. Ebooks have taken the place of paperbacks and books I want on my shelves, I now buy as hardcovers. I'm actually annoyed that some of my favorite books are not available as hardcovers.

Love a hardcover. Maybe prefer them. Certainly as collectable items that have the added benefit of being awesome entertainment too. But I do buy a lot of PBs, because I read on public transport and that's just easier (and therefore increases my reading). But favourite of all is the small hardback.

Besides, without hardcovers, how could I hoard all the words inside the books. Once I have the book, I own all those words forever.

This man sounds like the poster child for the term “wet blanket”. He waits a year or more for a book because he is too cheap. This is a dude who shames the elderly for splurging on cake and does dates on coupons and brags on the savings. A living embodiment of a particular circle of hell. Ugh.

Apparently he bought the hard back of against the day and broke both his arms trying to lift it, so we must all pay for his disgrace. Someone tell the Guardian that they need to throw the noodle armed anti-intellectuals out of their editorial section.

Dude! One doesn't "lug around" a book. One READS it — nestled in one's fav reading chair, rocker, couch or bed. If one cannot find time to do that, one's got bigger problems that should be addressed first.

Something awful happened to trade paperback durability. My... 2026-1954=72-year-old trade paperbacks are in fine shape, pages yellowed but strong, flexible, firmly attached to a spine that flexes without cracking. My thirty-year-old trade paperbacks are falling apart.

If we’re doing old man ranting, I’m still annoyed that mass market paperbacks are going away, but I do understand that the market for them just might not be there anymore. This article though was just full on shaking his cane and waving his fist bad.

Quick addendum to add that I love hardcovers as well and I’m captivated by videos of artists rebinding paperbacks into beautiful hardcover works of art, but I will miss smaller paperbacks for the form factor and how much my youth centered around them.

Wow. Just wow. Obviously, I don't have any particular insider knowledge, but it really looks to me like if you were going to kill any format, it would be the paperback (esp mass market) as its niche of portable affordability has been largely eaten by e-books and paperbacks aren't going away.

Now that sprayed edges are a thing, I'm waiting for someone to reinvent the fore-edge painting. Also, I prefer hardcovers now that I have the money to purchase them; they stand up to multiple rereads better, and I am very much a rereader.

Also needs to be said: hardcovers last longer. The reason you could pick up a book from your grandparents' shelf as a kid is exacty because of the cover. It's a long term investment.

I’m happy to pay the hardback price as there’s so much work that goes into them but I really hate how uncomfortable hardbacks are. I’m either forced to buy the ebook which I’m not the biggest fan of, or wait until the paperback is released

Paperbacks just don't have the same smell. That gooooood smell. Yes, I am a person who opens a new hardcover and sticks their face right in there and goes "Whuffffffhhhaaahh~🩷🥰😌" like some weird lil book addict goblin doing lines of prose.

Not to be overly harsh, but Larry got up there in the hill and he can just die there. My shelves are 90% hard back books. It’s never gonna be a lower ratio. They’re way more enjoyable to read!

Recently, with some persistent issues with my eyes, I also find that piece really obnoxiously ableist. I don't know what proportion of hardcovers are large-print editions, but I'm glad they're still around.

Oh, I do too - and I'm totally mindful of the delicious privilege of having easy access to a public library system that hasn't gone FUBAR. Yet! Anything that make the word more accessible is OK, while still loving the sheer sensual pleasure of doing it old school. 😍

I’m a little weirdly circumstanced, but paperbacks wouldn’t have lasted long in my house. One kid can be rough on books, and I have four of them. After seeing Magic Treehouse and Nate the Great paperbacks absolutely shredded followed by a couple Percy Jacksons, it’s hardcovers all the way here.👍

I don't know. Publishers are really hidebound, if you'll excuse the pun. It took them long enough to adopt ebooks and not window the release. I always thought mass market paperbacks were the way to go, but they didn't do those for all books. Insane with pod. But what do I know. I'm just an author

grandpa used to say they help him get to sleep at night when it clonks on his head paperback wont suffice

If we have to kill a format (which I don’t think we do, as a reader!), I’d argue that these days, it should be the paperback. If I want to own a book, shelve it, and re-read it, a hardback is well worth it. For more ephemeral reads, there are ebooks (or audiobooks, I suppose, but I don’t indulge).

I sell my ebooks for about $2.99 and my paperbacks for $11.99-$15.99. I've never offered hardcovers. I have more on my plate right now than I can handle with the two versions. I suspect a lot of s-p authors are in a similar place.

Absolutely. Hard cover all the way. As soon as it’s home, dust wrapper off and into a protective cover. Onto the bookshelf out of sunlight, get it read and onto the next one.

Getting the vibe they're trying to kill all types of books. We just lost the cheap mass market paperback, now the hardcover, in a year it'll be the regular paperbacks, and then eBooks.

I love a hardcover book! If a book is too heavy for you, I don’t think the problem is the book. Too expensive? So are cathedrals. So is preserving anything worth keeping for more than six months. Hardcovers exist because some ideas deserve better than flimsy airport-pamphlet energy.

While I do like HB books, I will also say that they are not the easiest to haul around. BUT... and maybe this might sound pretentious, but I make it a point to take HB books to signings when I can get an autograph. But Then it goes in my shelf and I read the SB version. :-)

French publishing got rid of the « too expensive » hardbacks ages ago. All that changed is that large paperbacks took their place as initial edition, and nowadays they sell for even more than the average price tag for an English market hardback.