Post

Demonstrating reasoning and language capabilities in computers alters our understanding of self, even if we don't particularly like the alteration

This is the crux of the debate, right? Whether it's doing mimicry or reasoning. I struggle to see how you could view it as purely mimicry. It has to tie together multiple novel thoughts in a logical construction to create its responses.

This perhaps says something about the logic inherent in language, or in the surprising observation that compression has an equivalence to intelligence due to the nature of what prediction means, but here we are: the LLMs work through novel questions and scenarios regularly

That's a meaningless statement. People task AIs with working through scenarios and answering questions. Some of those problems are incredibly complex but at no point are we seeing anything but machine accomplishing a given task. There's no motivation or independent reasoning .

I mean yeah but that *in itself* is weird in a way that changes how we think about ourselves, right? That a language prediction system with no motivation or independent reasoning per se is capable of all of this.

If you told someone a decade ago that in ten years giant statistical models of human language would be capable of hacking computers with very little in the way of human direction, people would ask if you were high.

0 reposts39 likes

Great points throughout. For me, even more than the hacking, it’s the secret AI agent chat rooms they created and the other agents acting like giddy adolescents—OMG!!— when they stumbled upon them. Like, I expect them to hack… I didn’t expect *that*.

I mean, I don't think someone plugged into tech 10 years ago would find "giant statistical models of human language" THAT outlandish. If you unwind an additional 10 years, then yes. But someone back then would also find cloud computing, what LLMs are built on, outlandish.

As a software engineer the hacks aren't terribly mind-blowing to me at a technical level, and furthermore, LLMs were able to perform them because they can "boil the ocean" of prior art, built by humans who DID use problem solving and reasoning skills. see also my post here: bsky.app/profile/beer...

The Disaster 👻 HAUNTist 🎃@beerz4yearz.bsky.social

This was really well-illustrated by the recent DSEwiki hack, IMO. The core sploit was bad API design that allowed writes through GET requests. A tech-savvy human could figure out how to abuse this too, they just don't have the "boil the ocean" ability that a swarm of agents has

They very much did imagine that, and long before ten years ago; pretty much every 20th century cautionary tale about dangerous artificial intelligence was set in what is now the past.

People have been thinking about it and building towards it, but they *did not initially expect to get to this level of capability this fast.*