Post

"When news of his firing came late last week, Kai-Yuan Cheng, an atmospheric scientist at one of the crown jewels of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), had one thought in mind:

He had 1 hour to tie up his research on severe storm forecasting. “I worked to the last minute of my federal employment,” he says. “I tried my best to wrap up my work before I lost access.” I still don't understand the logic behind these firings. Musk Felon seem preprogrammed to self-destruct.

"...it’s dispiriting to see the future leaders of climate research at institutions like GFDL fired indiscriminately, while countries in Asia and Europe are matching or surpassing the U.S. in weather and climate modeling.

This is so disturbing and painful. The scope covered by NOAA in the US is covered in Europe by EUMETSAT and (plus) ECMWF. There shall be a program to welcome NOAA and NASA earth sciences scientists there.

I'm sorry, Zack. This is awful. I've been reading papers from the GFDL people since I was in undergrad (actually I used one of their earlier model's output for my MSc on climate change and wildfire risk, back in 1992).

(the Social Sciences departments at U of Guelph picked my thesis as the top one for that year, and said it was because I used multiple models .... first time I'd won anything, and it was partly thanks to GFDL)

This part ...just ... Research and innovation has been vital to the US's standing globally. We were considered leaders once. Now? We are facing a potential brain drain by forcing out the brilliant individuals who contribute to that. Hello other (insert country here), we have a gift for you....

Narratives about climate modeling and the people/groups with breakthrough impact humanize the ‘heavy lift’ that rarely makes headlines but should. I had the pleasure of coordinating on early ‘wedge theory’ with GFDL decades ago. Believer in SISU and that climate research momentum resumes. 🌎