Pinned
Bird account
Bird account
@dialecticbio.bsky.social
The "The Dialectical Biologist" account. Structural biology & anti-racism. Loves: birds, proteins, Linux, Lewontin Hates: race science, racists, transphobes
3.1K followers510 following520 posts
Bird account reposted
Bird account reposted
Here is the full suspension letter from UGent that was sent to Nathan Cofnas, it shows ample reason for his suspension and potential termination. Including breach of contract, using the University of Ghent’s name and legitimacy to promote his racial supremacist views and causing reputational damage.
Correction on this previous post of mine: it turns out the allegations of Arday's fraud and plagiarism were *highly* overblown... So the UK media really just destroyed a person's life at the behest of Nazis
Awful. Think about how little media attention other high profile cases of academic fraud have received compared to Arday. Ariely, Gino, Pruitt, Richard Lynn... barely a peep compared to this media frenzy. But obviously, all those fraudsters were not Black
Bird account reposted
Plenty to reflect about re: the Arday affair, but I'm going to repeat this one thing. The playbook the right used here is effective even though it's not especially sophisticated, as it relies on the audience to do the dirty work. I've been calling it "Trojan horse propaganda", let's go with that. 1/
Bird account reposted
Marcus Feldman and Jessica Riskin review 'The Social Genome: The New Science of Nature and Nurture' by Dalton Conley. www.nybooks.com/articles/202... (it's a scathing critique)
Given that Harden has a new book out that is largely a repeat of her first book, The Genetic Lottery, here's a list of critical reviews of that book. 1. Lottery, Luck, or Legacy: gcbias.org/wp-content/u...
I implore everyone to read this brilliant book review of Kathryn Paige Harden new book on the genetics of criminality. It cuts right through the bullshit to state plainly what Harden's project really is: eugenics bullshit and grifting lareviewofbooks.org/article/orig...
5. The Genetic Lottery is a bust for both genetics and policy massivesci.com/articles/gen...
6. Does it really matter if you win or lose the genetic lottery? www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
Given that Harden has a new book out that is largely a repeat of her first book, The Genetic Lottery, here's a list of critical reviews of that book. 1. Lottery, Luck, or Legacy: gcbias.org/wp-content/u...
I implore everyone to read this brilliant book review of Kathryn Paige Harden new book on the genetics of criminality. It cuts right through the bullshit to state plainly what Harden's project really is: eugenics bullshit and grifting lareviewofbooks.org/article/orig...
3. Why DNA Is No Key to Social Equality: On Kathryn Paige Harden’s “The Genetic Lottery” lareviewofbooks.org/article/why-...
Given that Harden has a new book out that is largely a repeat of her first book, The Genetic Lottery, here's a list of critical reviews of that book. 1. Lottery, Luck, or Legacy: gcbias.org/wp-content/u...
I implore everyone to read this brilliant book review of Kathryn Paige Harden new book on the genetics of criminality. It cuts right through the bullshit to state plainly what Harden's project really is: eugenics bullshit and grifting lareviewofbooks.org/article/orig...
2. Luck, Lottery, or Legacy? The Problem of Confounding. A reply to Harden gcbias.org/wp-content/u...
I implore everyone to read this brilliant book review of Kathryn Paige Harden new book on the genetics of criminality. It cuts right through the bullshit to state plainly what Harden's project really is: eugenics bullshit and grifting lareviewofbooks.org/article/orig...
I implore everyone to read this brilliant book review of Kathryn Paige Harden new book on the genetics of criminality. It cuts right through the bullshit to state plainly what Harden's project really is: eugenics bullshit and grifting lareviewofbooks.org/article/orig...
I implore everyone to read this brilliant book review of Kathryn Paige Harden new book on the genetics of criminality. It cuts right through the bullshit to state plainly what Harden's project really is: eugenics bullshit and grifting lareviewofbooks.org/article/orig...
Fondly remembering that Gad Saad has gifted us hilarious examples of evolutionary psychology's "just-so" storytelling E.g., women don't want a mandatory paternity test shoved on them, because they're duplicitous harlots, and not for any other reasons www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/homo...
Gad Saad, the evo psych hack and IDW reject, has published a new evo psych "paper". It is an extended twitter screed that's indistinguishable from standard Nazi talking points. This is apparently what passes as scholarship in the Springer journal 'Theory and Society'
A quick look at the editorial board of this journal reveals how this slop got published: it's filled with the Quillette freak crowd, including Cory Clark, Steven Pinker, and (lol) Colin Wright link.springer.com/journal/1118...
Rainbow lorikeets got published in Science. Big congrats to all rainbow lorikeets and bird lovers in general www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
"[Edge's] male members were preaching master-race ideology. Citing their work, Brockman predicted in 2005 that the “dangerous idea of the next decade” would be that “groups of people differ genetically in their average talents”." www.thenerve.news/p/epstein-bi...
Bird account reposted
There are so many fucked up things with the current administration that it's hard to focus on one but this recent move is basically a death sentence for the planet. I've been involved with more boots on the ground actions over the years than I can count and this really bums me out.
A story of how science should work: an issue with methodology is picked up in this paper, authors agree they made a mistake and retract: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... Meanwhile, many papers using Richard Lynn's fraudulent National IQ data are still unretracted www.statnews.com/2024/06/20/r...
Steven Pinker in 2019: “I was not aware of the charges against Epstein at the time. And no, I was not paid for the letter" www.buzzfeednews.com/article/pete... Epstein files: [shows Pinker was paid $10,000 for the letter] www.justice.gov/epstein/file...
Bird account reposted
It's also one of the world's most famous scientists sending up the balloon to his fellow powerful men that a young woman with no institutional affiliation or financial clout dared to speak out about their raping habits. *She* is organising a conspiracy; *he* is merely giving a friend the heads-up.
This email from Dawkins in the latest Epstein documents is a kind of perfect glimpse into the psychology of old boys club: Dawkins whinges about the "nasty young woman", but also has an undercurrent of unease, and seeks reassurance from Brockman that the child sex trafficker wasn't all *that* bad