doinkboy

doinkboy

@doinkboy.bsky.social

Social Science Data Analysis (especially Dyadic, Mediation, SEM; davidakenny.net) and My Twisted Take on Political & Cultural Topics; Reposts Are Not Necessarily Endorsements

483 followers348 following133 posts

doinkboy reposted

Great quote from a 100% correct piece. We know all of our models of the world are wrong, but we still have to do research and take action in the world. How do we balance those concerns?

Julia M. Rohrer@dingdingpeng.the100.ci

“…as peer reviewers or question askers at conferences, we must accept that our pet issue is not more important than the other 10 issues and if the analyst has had a good go at handling a bunch of issues, we can’t just pile more and more issues on them to fix. It is impossible.”

doinkboy reposted

doinkboy reposted

One week to go until I'll be reviewing the applications - can't wait! I've now added information on the top-up funds I have available too. Please spread the word to anyone you know who might be interested in doing a PhD in quantitative psychopathology :) miriamkforbes.academic.ws

miriamkforbes.academic.wsMiriam K. Forbes, PhDI am an Associate Professor in the School of Psychological Sciences at Macquarie University. I was awarded my PhD in Psychology in 2014, and went on to do po...
Miri Forbes@miriforbes.bsky.social

I’m recruiting two new PhD students to start in 2027, working with me on my program of research in quantitative psychopathology. I’ve put some information for interested students on my website: miriamkforbes.academic.ws Please share with anyone you know who might be interested!

doinkboy reposted

A reasonable interpretation is that less time on homework means lower grades. That's not necessarily the fault of AI

Jay Van Bavel, PhD@jayvanbavel.bsky.social

Using AI helps people get higher grades and get their work done faster, but they learn less & suffer on actual exams I saw this in my own large Intro Psych class: -the exam average is 85% -after AI, it shot up to 95% -after I made the final in person it went to 68% www.economist.com/graphic-deta...

doinkboy reposted

One of the more counterintuitive findings in relationship science is how much of what we "see" in a partner is actually something within us. I talked with Shankar Vedantam about projection and other biases in how we see people on the latest episode of Hidden Brain.

hiddenbrain.orgHow to Be a Better Partner - Hidden Brain MediaWhen we look at the people we love, how clearly do we really see them? This week, how our fears, desires, and insecurities can shape our perceptions of our partners — sometimes creating the very reali...

doinkboy reposted

doinkboy reposted

Replying to @jayvanbavel.bsky.social

This was bad enough, but he is now misleading people about it. For instance, yesterday he posted on LinkedIn that she was lying about the ruling. So I am writing to fact check the misinformation he spread and share the email with the official ruling from the NYU Office of Equal Opportunity:

doinkboy reposted

I feel like "The conclusions of this paper are fully in line with the corresponding author's whole schtick so they really want them to be true" should count as a conflict of interest #phdsky

doinkboy reposted

doinkboy reposted

We made an open repository of close relationships measures. Our goal is to catalogue all of the published self-report measures in relationship science. You can help us expand the database by suggesting measures you tend to use in your research, or by uploading your own measures! relascale.com

relascale.comRelaScale - Psychological Measures and ConstructsRelaScale is a searchable database of psychological measures and constructs for relationship researchers.

doinkboy reposted

Replying to @i4replication.bsky.social

7/ There is also an important caution. Human-only teams found more major coding errors than AI-assisted teams. So even when AI assistance preserved reproduction success, it did not clearly improve the harder work of finding consequential problems in code and data.

doinkboy reposted

Teaching DAGs sounds easy, until students actually have to make one themselves. A new tutorial lays out simple steps to make it clear and easy for students to understand. Draw process, selection, outcome, confounds. From Nathan J. Quimpo & Peter M. Steiner files.osf.io/v1/resources... #psych

doinkboy reposted

doinkboy reposted

Hey psychologists, when you're explaining some psychological phenomenon that's perfectly well captured in psychological terms, maybe you don't need to refer to some shitty neuroimaging study with ten people to make it seem more "sciencey"...

doinkboy reposted

Done with my last talk before leave! This one was fun and I'm glad I added Columbo last minute. Slides here, in case you're curious: juliarohrer.com/wp-content/u...

Julia M. Rohrer@dingdingpeng.the100.ci

Final spurt -- preparing slides for my last talk before I go on leave. It's titled "Do causal inference practices uniquely predict causal inference quality?" and I'm already looking forward to this slide

doinkboy reposted

New paper published in Personal Relationships 📢with Carmen Surariu and Kathy Carnelley We examined how social media self-disclosure and self-presentation relate to perceived interpersonal benefits in collectivistic cultural contexts (Brazil and Indonesia). Open access: doi.org/10.1111/pere...

doi.orgFrom Shares to Social Ties: Social Media Self‐Disclosure, Self‐Presentation, and Social Benefits in a Collectivistic Cultural SettingDrawing on Uses and Gratifications Theory, this study investigates the link between social media self-disclosure and self-presentation and perceived interpersonal benefits. Whereas self-disclosure in...

doinkboy reposted

New paper— everyone is collecting intensive longitudinal data but recent review studies report that less than half of studies consider measurement/psychometrics. The paper covers a few foundational psychometric methods for ILD and provides a shiny app to apply them link.springer.com/article/10.3...

link.springer.comA primer on intensive longitudinal psychometrics - Behavior Research MethodsMany intensive longitudinal studies are interested in topics that are not always amenable to direct physical measurement and instead are often theorized as latent constructs (e.g., affect, emotion, mo...

doinkboy reposted

Last week this man was Chamberlain to his own Hitler. This week he is Judas to his own Jesus. One can pile up the blasphemies and the ironies or one could just say that this man is unwell.

doinkboy reposted

doinkboy reposted

Replying to @psycheddiego.bsky.social

In follow-up work, we will examine sources of interdependence, shared fate, and cooperation (1) among dyads to study bidirectional (i.e., partner) effects, (2) whether shared fate guides partner-choice decisions, and (3) consequences for social integration & wellbeing (9/10).

doinkboy reposted

Part 2 of my shrinkage estimator series is out! Part 1 covered the univariate case, but now we dive into multivariate shrinkage 🤓 We cover Spearman's classic correlation disattenuation formula, multivariate James-Stein estimators, and hierarchical methods too haines-lab.com/post/how-to-...

haines-lab.comHow to Estimate a Correlation, and What It Means for Science | Computational PsychologyIntroduction In Part 1 of this series, we showed that six different methods for estimating individual means—James-Stein, classical true score estimation, empirical Bayes, ridge regression, and hierarc...
Nathaniel Haines@natehaines.bsky.social

New blog just dropped! This one is all about estimators—we cover James-Stein, classical test theory, empirical Bayes, penalized regression, and hierarchical models, showing how they all can be used to do a better job than sample stats alone 🤓 haines-lab.com/post/how-to-...

doinkboy reposted

🌐Online First Publication: Good years. Bad years. Your family feels every one of them. A new 16-year study from Shrout et al. on what really drives marriages toward — or away — from the edge. 💒 doi.org/10.1177/0265... #AcademicSky #Psychology #SocialPsychology #FamilySci #ResearchPublishing

doi.orgSage Journals: Discover world-class researchSubscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

doinkboy reposted

dlvr.itCore Intuitions of Psychological Non-Contradiction: Infants Assume That Individual Agents Act and Communicate CoherentlyAbstractHumans generally posit that contrary mental states are unlikely to co-exist within a single mind. We tested the early ontogeny of this assumption in two domains: action and communication. Studies 1A and 1B tested whether 9-month-old infants assume that agents act coherently. Infants watched interactions between two hands whose owner(s) were invisible. In the contrary goals condition, the hand performed contrary actions—one hand reached for an object while the other impeded it. Later, during test trials, infants learned that the hands belonged to one or two people. Looking-time patterns across the contrary goals and a baseline conditions indicated that clear goal conflict led infants to infer two agents, suggesting they viewed it as unlikely for a single person to thwart their own goal. Study 2 tested whether infants assume communicative coherence, testing whether they assume that a single informant is unlikely to entertain and communicate conflicting information while two informants might do so. Informants pointed to indicate a toy’s location to 15-month-olds. When two different informants each pointed to a different place, infants did not follow one pointing gesture more than the other. However, when a single informant pointed successively to two locations, infants followed the second gesture, implying they viewed it as an updated, not contradictory, message. Thus, infants assumed that a single informant is unlikely to contradict themselves (i.e., by asserting that a toy is simultaneously in two locations). These findings reveal an early-emerging assumption of psychological coherence in infants’ representation of other minds, across both action and communication contexts.