Eytan Adar
Eytan Adar
@eytan.adar.prof
Michigan faculty, http://www.cond.org
1.7K followers2.4K following385 posts
If you cheated off your neighbor during a test for 10 minutes, and then they left, it would have similar results, no? news.berkeley.edu/2026/10/09/u...
We are running a UIST workshop on revibing--the idea that technical HCI papers can be reconstructed from the paper itself. We're interested in the implications for evaluation, research, and education. Join us! revibe-hci.github.io
It's mostly written for faculty, but there are also bits in there for students. eytanadar.medium.com/ai-native-ph...
Claude/Cursor/whatever for the win when you want to demo something to a student but the applet/website doesn't work any more. Today's demo: stochastic resonance (cond.org/stochres/)
Inspired by this thread: bsky.app/profile/tedu... (but it's not about taxing the LLM vendors, but the users... Chevron/OpenAI can pay, but so can the people who fill up/use the resource)
Good post by a history prof, in the genre “What most people don’t understand yet is …” — although, in my experience, a lot of the academics it’s addressing do grasp what’s happening with agents, and just really wish it would not happen.
Almost a year to the day since I last posted this. An admonishment by Mao's government to the China's statisticians on the need for "statistics with particular Party character." (Chinese newspaper in '61)
The gallup presidential approval poll is an institution in American politics that predates world war 2. With Trump’s approval in the 30s, they’re ending it. thehill.com/homenews/med...
Eytan Adar reposted
The Open Visualization Academy (OVA) IS LIVE! openvisualizationacademy.org Thread follows #dataViz #infographics #dataJournalism #dataVisualization
When reacting to some kind of new (manufactured) scandal every day, the press forgets they can come back the next day and say: you didn't know about it yesterday, but you've had a day to think about this, what's your reaction?
Q: What's your reaction to yesterday's purge of senior ICE officials? When is it time for Congress to do some oversight? MIKE JOHNSON: I don't know any of the details of that yet. I just heard about that, literally I was walking in.
Images selected in this way are better representatives of the main properties of the concept, while also highlighting what makes it different from other, related concepts. The paper with more details is here: arxiv.org/abs/2509.15059 (5/5)
We need something more technical sounding than "co-evolution" to describe this... RHLAF: reinforcing human learning through AI feedback? HAAF: human adaptation through AI feedback? :)
As LLMs Improve, People Adapt Their Prompts a study shows that a lot of the real world performance gains that people see are actually because people learn how to use the model better arxiv.org/abs/2407.14333
Who knew... Claude can be funny... ;) Real researchers don't use LLMs: claude.ai/share/91111e...
Taken to the extreme this starts to sound like real programmers don't eat quiche (www.bernstein-plus-sons.com/RPDEQ.html). Real researchers don't use LLMs. Real researchers don't use search engines. Real researchers don't use anything other than articles faxed to them from the author.
Eytan Adar reposted
I occasionally watch this couple doing a massive rebuild on their house. It's interesting how much they use/trust ChatGPT: youtu.be/KEgQO6ynJWE?.... Guess this is the new post-search world, but I'm waiting for the episode where they figure out it gave them bad advice on something critical.
Well, at least I'll have finished one book in 2025. Recommended if you like board games and/or artifacts of social life. www.goodreads.com/book/show/20...
Consider a fictional graduate student brain N, and a scientist Q who wishes to use N in their research pipeline (e.g. for analysis and/or interpretation). Functionally, N is not fully understood by Q. Is it acceptable to use N? To be clear, there's a difference, but not sure it's "understanding."
Scientific Integrity Question Consider a fictional AI system M, and a scientist S who wishes to use M in their research pipeline (e.g., for analysis and/or interpretation). Functionally, M is not fully understood by S. In your opinion, is it acceptable that S uses M in their research pipeline?
Eytan Adar reposted
📢📢I'm recruiting PhD students for Fall 2025 to join my research lab at the University of Michigan! Interested in doing research in social computing systems? Consider applying! 📢📢 Application deadline: Dec 15 cse.engin.umich.edu/academics/gr...
If you like Wordle, let me recommend Typeset (dvc.games/products/typ...). You can try the digital variant here: mxjasperbeatrix.itch.io/typeset but I like the physical version (easier to play with others).
FWIW, blueark.app worked well. $5 to copy my tweet history over. Not sure *my* tweets were worth that... But that's not their fault.