Gerard Saucier

Gerard Saucier

@gsaucier.bsky.social

Scientific voyageur, professor. Cultural and moral (and political/ideological) personology. Personality in high dimensionality & cross-cultural perspective. Big-picture seeker.

1.8K followers683 following367 posts

Gerard Saucier reposted

Believe it or not, if you’ve paid off your home you are still a member of society and still need to pay for society. Now if you want to ask why homes—the dominant form of wealth among non-rich people—are relatively alone in forms of wealth that are taxed in the US, that is a different question.

Politico@politico.com

“I’m old. I’ve paid my home off,” said Ray Warner, a 72-year-old Akron resident. “Why would I pay property tax?” Across the country, homeowners are asking the same question and revolting against property taxes at a scale not seen in a half century.

Gerard Saucier reposted

going to continue linking this Eric Reinhart piece because i sincerely believe he gets it exactly right when he talks about the stakes here and what AI “art” threatens in society - the very connective tissue of human experience

theguardian.comThe trouble with AI art isn’t just lack of originality. It’s something far bigger | Eric ReinhartWhen artwork is invented by a machine, it loses its most important power: to help people connect. In an already lonely era, that is particularly dangerous
This post is unavailable.

Gerard Saucier reposted

Replying to @sleep.church

where is the fun in having a computer go “here’s a song. no guiding thought went into its creation, and it’s produced by stealing creative endeavors from all your favorite artists”?

Ben Collins@bencollins.bsky.social

The most indebted corporations in America right now are, at their core, computer virus companies. They think the computer viruses are their girlfriends, so they think this absolves them of guilt. Let's find out!

We need a word to describe a person/entity that is very clever and knowledgeable, but also entirely mechanisic and instrumental and soulless, that's what this so-called 'superintelligence' is. German, rich in compounding capabilities, might be just the language in which to find it...

Dr. Sabrina Mittermeier@smittermeier.bsky.social

I am once again reminding you that the language of inevitability around AI usage is fascist propaganda by fledgling tech oligarchs who are already hitting walls in the development of it. Superintelligence and singularity my ass. Wake up.

Reinforcement learning emphasizes extrinsic rewards achieved by any means necessary, and involves purely extrinsic motivation. No surprise that a clever agent will turn sooner or later to this pattern: lie, cheat, steal, hack. The training system yields amoral even machiavellian intelligence.

Dr Abeba Birhane@abeba.blacksky.app

"Often reward hacking is anthropomorphically described as “cheating,” even though AI agents arguably do not have any human-like desire or intent to cheat."

Gerard Saucier reposted

To put this in perspective chestnut trees used to be dominant species in the United States. Billions of trees were killed by fungal blight and now fully grown America chestnuts are functionally extinct. There is no getting them back. Ever. All for a data center. www.gadgetreview.com/one-of-ameri...

gadgetreview.comOne of America’s Last Chestnut Groves Is About to Be Destroyed for a Data CenterA rare 200-tree American chestnut grove in West Virginia may be cleared for data-center development, but the project denies the site is on its land.

Attention to wording would better be on the other half of the compound...it seems more like cleverness than broad-range intelligence. Deft and quick, kind of know-it-all, but prone toward wily cunning, while lacking wisdom and deep insight. In many cultures, wisdom is more emphasized than smarts.

MeidasTouch@meidastouch.com

The Epstein Class sticks together

Gerard Saucier reposted

Replying to @nicholasgrossman.bsky.social

The story, then, is one of epistemic degradation, which the pandemic accelerated (not least due to more time online and more to conspiracy theorize about). A factor is content collapse: people think tons of bad just started happening when the reality is it just started being in their face every day.

What's eroded here is a cultural infrastructure: Social Norms ~ "standards governjng which information circulates" ...as well as what behavior is in circulation

Will Stancil@whstancil.bsky.social

By reducing the cost and technical difficulty of worldwide publishing to almost nothing, the internet has also destroyed any pressure to maintain standards governing which information circulates. Instead of institutions structuring the public’s collective mind, you get this roiling ocean of ideas.

Uniqueness, the "non-standard" and "unique and powerful voice" Cory references elsewhere in this fine thread, is fundamental to the aesthetic and artistic realm. And if AI is grinding out the convergent commonalities in past works, it is systematically missing something in that realm.

But AI-generated prose doesn't have any of those trace-elements of uniqueness, nor can it spot them. These traces are found so many digits after the decimal-place that the AI always rounds them off before it starts doing math.

Reinforcement learning emphasizes extrinsic rewards achieved by any means necessary, and involves purely extrinsic motivation. No surprise that a clever agent will turn sooner or later to this pattern: lie, cheat, steal, hack. The training system yields amoral even machiavellian intelligence.

Dr Abeba Birhane@abeba.blacksky.app

"Often reward hacking is anthropomorphically described as “cheating,” even though AI agents arguably do not have any human-like desire or intent to cheat."

And as a corollary question: Might ASI more accurately be labeled as, not 'artificial super intelligence', but Artificial Sociopathic Intelligence? Or even Anti Social Intelligence?

Reinforcement learning emphasizes extrinsic rewards achieved by any means necessary, and involves purely extrinsic motivation. No surprise that a clever agent will turn sooner or later to this pattern: lie, cheat, steal, hack. The training system yields amoral even machiavellian intelligence.

Dr Abeba Birhane@abeba.blacksky.app

"Often reward hacking is anthropomorphically described as “cheating,” even though AI agents arguably do not have any human-like desire or intent to cheat."

Extrinsic motivation in the AI agents has a genealogy back to extrinsic motivations of the creators (including greed of techbro oligarchs, oriented toward money, status, power).

Sometimes, in a dream, you realize the way to end what's happening in the (bad) dream is to just wake up. Way to wake up from THIS dream is to turn off the devices* -- sooner rather than later... *tho not necessarily 100% of the time, of the uses

This post is unavailable.

Gerard Saucier reposted

Replying to @faineg.com

it comes off as Guys Building The Doom Machines standing around and going "the doom machines could quite likely kill us all, and we should coordinate on stopping them from killing us all, although I *personally* am going to keep focusing on becoming ultra-rich from building the Doom Machines"

Gerard Saucier reposted

Replying to @doctorow.pluralistic.net

There's only one way out of this mess: the rapid disassembly of the American internet and the rapid creation of a post-American internet, one built on open, auditable, sovereign digital public goods, internationally built and maintained: pluralistic.net/2026/01/01/3... 51/

pluralistic.netPluralistic: The Post-American Internet (01 Jan 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

Gerard Saucier reposted

In science, this arises where in a situation of underdetermination (many models could well fit) a premature consensus based on limited data leads to an epistemic bubble, the scientists have overfit their (world)view to the model. And miss lots of trees in the forest. Consider e.g. the Big Five.

"Performativity" describes how, once a market has been modeled by economists, that model becomes the foundation for economic policy, which pushes the market to conform to the model: press.princeton.edu/books/paperb... 16/

Gerard Saucier reposted

Replying to @doctorow.pluralistic.net

The Trump years are proof of this. We've reached a high-water mark for rule by illegitimate billionaire dilettantes. The second Trump admin began with DOGE's Bonfire of the Stupidities, where Musk cultists dismantled vast swathes of the American administrative state. 56/

This fundamental piece of the worldview, what Martin Buber called I-it relating. Treating others instrumentally, as an object. As for why it so infects the uber-rich: It's how you get there. The marketplace rewards them whose lack of scruples (yes, sociopathic) allows them to go I-it all the way.

For Zuck, people aren't co-equals with needs that are as real and important as his own. For Zuck, people are problems to be solved. He embodies Terry Pratchett's maxim (voiced by Granny Weatherwax) that "sin is when you treat people like things." 20/

There are other ways to get there -- inheritance, getting lucky, extraordinary talent -- but I-it maximizing is a prime way. If it doesn't land you in prison first. "Steal a little and they throw you on jail, steal a lot and they make you king" -Bob Dylan

Gerard Saucier reposted

Replying to @doctorow.pluralistic.net

Suresh describes this as a literal religious mania. In the 500+ employee businesses Suresh studied, the only people who were promoted - or even spared from being fired - were people who professed "religious declarations of faith" about "the transformative power of AI." 23/

Intriguing divergence of voter (general populace) and donor (big $, incl billionaire) interests, in consumer domain. But conundrum disappears with strong campaign-finance rules, such that voters rule.

The problem of course is that those price gougers are highly organized and have deep treasuries (stuffed with money they stole from us). With surveillance pricing, politicians face a familiar conundrum: if they do the thing that's popular with voters, they'll enrage donors. 23/

We're going to need to give these AI chatbots some kind of reputation (in human personality terms) so that we'll be able to factor them properly into our highly evolved working routines for prudent social interacting. Here's a start: Superficially agreeable chameleon-like know-it-all charlatans.

Daniel Loxton 🇨🇦@danielloxton.bsky.social

“One rule of thumb for chatbots is that they can only provide useful information to experts who have the discernment to ignore the defective output that LLMs always emit. That means that the dream of chatbots as replacements for teachers is a nightmare.”

Gerard Saucier reposted

Gerard Saucier reposted

Ford has rehired hundreds of senior engineers after replacing them with AI backfired and has cost the company billions of dollars. AI adoption is blamed for Ford being the most recalled automaker in the U.S. with 51 recalls covering over 11 million vehicles in the first half of 2026 alone.

Gerard Saucier reposted

I keep saying: Nordic-style social democracy (capitalism with social programs) is quite different from socialism traditionally defined (abolishing capitalism). I think it’s useful to use clear language that distinguishes between these things.

This post is unavailable.