Jake Faleschini

Any elected Democrat at the national level who does not have a plan to reform and neutralize the MAGA, partisan Supreme Court is not a serious person and should be laughed out of their primary.

The fact that the president's doctors are giving him the dementia test over and over again -- tracking his decline, most likely -- and that the president keeps bragging about having to take that test should be a five-alarm fire.

How did you find out the young man’s identity, @wsj.com? hmm?

Looking forward to the Chief Justice of the United States once again saying and doing absolutely nothing about the President once again going after an individual federal judge for applying the law when the President deliberately breaks it.

We can’t lawyer our way around a SCOTUS majority that wields power in bad faith to aggrandize their own power and their own faction. Power in America does not work the way it used to. Fascism has come and it’s not going away. We do not have the luxury of responding with patient incrementalism.

The deployment of the National Guard in DC is illegal. We are back in court this morning arguing against the continued presence of thousands of armed troops in our city. We're staying in this fight because the US military should not be policing American citizens anywhere in America — including DC.

It is my sincere hope that Musk is found personally liable for such significant damages here that Ms. Comans never has to work another day in her life if she so chooses.

I’ve got a piece in the @nytimes.com this morning about why Supreme Court reform has to be at the top of any agenda for democratic repair www.nytimes.com/2026/10/13/o...

More damaging revelations about Ken Paxton: A previously unreported New Year’s Eve 2024 celebration where Paxton partied in Dubai with two fugitives from U.S. justice and a woman who wasn’t his wife on.wsj.com/4yKLe4d

More than 1.5 million people have watched our video on how the Roberts court has ushered in a new era of Jim Crow. See why youtube.com/shorts/QVBHg...

This is a significant worsening of our current state of constitutional collapse. I know it feels like there are so many, and there are, but in terms of crossing the Rubicon moments this one's up there.

Sen. Susan Collins: I’m sure that Troy wants to pack the Supreme Court. Troy Jackson: I wouldn’t have to pack it if you didn’t put in Kavanaugh.

First Monday in October. The Supreme Court returns.

If in the next three years we don’t substantially reform the Court and throw Alito’s entire jurisprudence in the trash (and I mean all of it)… we will have allowed this rightwing politician to have made the US substantially more fascist, against the popular will.

Hey @politico.com can you explain why @thirdway.bsky.social is the source for what the Democrats' SCOTUS platform will be, when they don't even have the word "Democrat" in their name and routinely diss the party? I'll wait.

By "destroying" the VRA (the most impt civil right law) and "gutting" the 14th and 15th amendments Roberts MAGA #SCOTUS "has essentially ended the Second Reconstruction" replicating "the worst impulses of the Supreme Court in the 19th century." Read @ariberman.bsky.social + @pemalevy.bsky.social

This is a must read if you want to understand just how partisan, political, and racist the Supreme Court has become.

@ariberman.bsky.social and @pemalevy.bsky.social have a damning new story about how the Roberts Court is reviving Jim Crow, relying on the same legal tactics used to undermine the Reconstruction. A must read to understand the stakes of this election. www.motherjones.com/politics/202...

I have a piece in the Atlantic about SCOTUS’s ballroom order - and how the Court has a very wrongheaded and destructive account of the separation of powers www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0...

Turn on notifications to watch here: youtube.com/live/E5dhoNr...

Tomorrow an Epstein survivor, the DOJ spokesman Todd Blanche fired, and Blanche's own former co-chief all testify against his confirmation as Attorney General. Not on C-SPAN. Not on cable. I have the exclusive livestream. 2:30 PM ET. 🔗 below. youtube.com/shorts/p7Z21...

Show me where in the U.S. Constitution it details your right to fly on an airplane or get unlimited pasta at Olive Garden. I will wait.

Democrats must expand the Court.

Democrats who are skittish about reforming and regulating the Supreme Court need to get with the times. The public sees the Roberts Six for what they are.

Don't forget - what Susan Collins told Mainers. Just like she did when she voted for Kavanaugh, she wasn't being straight with Mainers. Maine voters should be more than concerned today. www.mainepublic.org/immigration/...

Not all coups involve tanks

Just days after John Roberts let MAGA #SCOTUS gave Trump autocrat like power to fire officials of federal agencies except for the Fed Reserve ...

#ELB: BREAKING: “Trump fires all Election Assistance Commission members, leaving agency unable to act” (This is going to be a BFD if Trump Tries to Assert the EAC’s Powers over the Federal Voter Registration Form) https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157199

"there’s no serious reform that doesn’t first include adding justices because that is the only immediate way to break the corrupt power of the current majority" + other thoughtful ideas from @joshtpm.bsky.social including but not limited term limits or mandatory retirement age.

Graham Platner’s history of sexual assault proves he does not belong in the US Senate. He belongs on the Supreme Court. by Susan Collins

thank you for your service Chotiner 🫡 giving Trump slightly less than 100% of what he wants does not mean the Court isnt ideologically-captured or the justices arent political actors the Court's ideology just overlaps slightly less than 100% w Trump's as the justices have their own political goals

Yes, you can. Because the case is obviously crazy and should be 9-0. Only now you have to add that at least 4 members of the court are also 'crazy' in that they are pursuing an activist agenda rather than interpreting the law.

"When Democrats retake control of the government... we have to decide if we want to win symbolic victories and simply get caught trying or if we actually want to make permanent, meaningful change. If it’s the latter, then inherently, that requires us to expand the Supreme Court.”

When you saw the faux-Alito retirement announcement this week, did you feel prepared to know what we're up against? Probably not. Check out AFJ's new website that will bring you up to speed because it could be a REAL announcement any day now.

We're prepared for a SCOTUS vacancy! It'll be one heck of a fight if it happens!

As speculation grows over a possible vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court, we are leading the effort to ensure the public, lawmakers, organizational partners, & the media have the information needed to scrutinize any potential nominee. View our potential SCOTUS shortlist here: afj.org/scotus-short...

Now we appeal the Balogun suspension in the Northern District of Texas

What a great system we have when two sexual harassers, unaccountable to the people, get to determine what constitutes “sex” with regards to discrimination for 400 million people.

I’ve got a piece in the @nytimes.com this morning about yesterday’s decision in Slaughter - and also about how any post-Trump response *must* include Supreme Court reform www.nytimes.com/2026/06/30/o...

Yes, Congress should be able to do these things. A court this contemptuous of Congress deserves to be packed by Congress, not only to correct these disastrous precedents but also because Congress needs to show both Article II and Article III who’s boss.

Big surprise. SCOTUS says Trump can fire anyone from independent agencies, except the Fed. For some reason, ungrounded in the Constitution, the federal reserve is unique. (The reason is that the Justices have financial investments and value them.) Couldn't be more nakedly political.

Waiting for the Supreme Court to tell us what scraps of the Constitution we get to keep is such a degrading ritual

✅